EURU COMPETITION andor COOPERATION 7 DILEMMAS - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 8
About This Presentation
Title:

EURU COMPETITION andor COOPERATION 7 DILEMMAS

Description:

... of the early 20. century [Ottoman Empire, the Habsburgs, inperial Germany]. Paths of total disolution, disintegration. 2. The Soviet collaps is different. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:56
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 9
Provided by: Tam116
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: EURU COMPETITION andor COOPERATION 7 DILEMMAS


1
EU-RU COMPETITION and/or COOPERATION 7 DILEMMAS
  • by
  • Pál TAMÁS IS HAS, Budapest

2
1. Partial dissolution of a continental Empire
  • 1.Historical patterns of continental imperial
    collapses of the early 20. century Ottoman
    Empire, the Habsburgs, inperial Germany. Paths
    of total disolution, disintegration.
  • 2. The Soviet collaps is different.
    Semi-disintegration reduction from global power
    to regional power survival of imperial elites
  • MUTUAL CONFUSION both of the Western and Russian
    elites.
  • Dominant strategies trial and error without any
    valid theories

3
2. Political control of the Black-Baltic Sea
division line
  • The only physico-geographical vertical division
    line in Europe- the Black-Baltic Sea area. Who
    should control it? From the end of 18-beginning
    of the 19.century until the late 1980ies only
    Russia, but before that time not Crimea, the
    Hansa, Sweden, Poland and only partly
    Moscovia-Russia.
  • And adter 1989-91? Why should it be controled
    fully by anybody new cooperative regimes.

4
3. EU as a cosmopolitan Empire
  • The EU is an cosmopolitanEmpire, but without
    self-reflection.
  • The basic difference between national states and
    empires- the boundary regimes stabil/liquid.
  • In the empire disappearence of the
    internal/external EU enlargement philosophies

5
4.post-trauma syndroms among the Russian elites
  • Percepcion of geopolitical nakedness previous
    techniques of security building of a state
    without natural boundaries big rivers, major
    mountains.
  • Who should know pay the bill for this new
    feelings of insecurity? The answer depends on
    actual and coming EUUS-RU power asymmetries.
    Psychosocial sensitivities should be handled via
    special agreements, programs of
    complementarities, etc.

6
5. RU-regional power, upgrated by US generated
global conflicts
  • The special role of the US in geopolitical
    upgrading the of the Russian oil and gas reserves
    with its Middle Eastern politics.
  • Iran as a special subject for exchange of
    influence. Russia will sell them to the West-
    this is out of question. But when and for what
    price? Ukraine? The Caucasus? Growing
    independence of political players in the buffer
    zones.

7
6. EU-RU different projections of interests
  • 1990ies
  • EU
    RU
  • US-Canada model additional

  • legitimation of the

  • nem democracy
  • 2000ies
  • economic interests alternative
    Westinstead
  • short-middle term of the US, but not
    the

  • Master

8
7. Ostpolitik in the EU the German and the
Polish/Baltic scenarios
  • German strategy additional power resource in the
    20.century Rapallo, Ribbentrop-Molotov, Brandts
    Ostpolitik
  • Polish/Baltic historical memory- confrontative
    overreaction with delay
  • THE HUNGARIAN DILEMMAS a. the scope of HUs
    autonomy in this questions? b. possibilities of
    long-term equal distance to Moscow and Kijev ? c.
    special relationship with RU in principle
    possible, but sacrifing the Visegrad foreign
    policy co-operation. Is that a good price?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com