Presenta.IndeNov.01 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 28
About This Presentation
Title:

Presenta.IndeNov.01

Description:

Design benefiting from improvements derived from return on ... Provide all the data and informations during the redaction ... to outage duration reduction ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:55
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 29
Provided by: FRAMA
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Presenta.IndeNov.01


1
(No Transcript)
2
Licensing Assistance and Design Certification
3
Licensing Assistance The Daya Bay- Ling Ao
Example
4
Daya Bay NPP
2 Reactors (985 MWe)
  • First high power reactor in China
  • Design benefiting from improvements derived from
    return on experience from similar reactors in
    France and export

5
General Tasks of the NI Supplier in Assistance
Licensing to the Operator
  • Provide all the data and informations during the
    redaction of the safety documents for each of the
    three steps preliminary , provisional, final
  • Provide all information necessary to answer the
    questions raised by the safety authorities during
    the evaluation realised by the safety authorities
    on the safety analysis report

6
The Safety Analysis Report
  • The Safety Analysis Report describes and
    justifies to the Safety Authority the provisions
    adopted at each stage in the life of the
    installation (design, construction,
    commissioning, operation and decommissioning) to
    comply with the regulations and guarantee nuclear
    safety
  • Provides information enabling verification
  • That all risks (whether of nuclear origin or not)
    and all possible events (of internal and external
    origin) have been properly taken into
    consideration
  • That the event of an accident, protection of the
    staff, the population and environment is properly
    assured by adequate means in place
  • The nuclear operator is responsible for the
    safety analysis report and associated licensing
  • The designer supports the operator

7
SAR - Typical Sharing of Responsibilities
8
Daya Bays Reference Plant Gravelines 5
9
Summary of the Main Approval Steps
  • Preliminary Safety Report
  • Construction Permit
  • Provisional Safety Report
  • Fuel Loading Authorization
  • Final Safety Report
  • Authorization of Commercial Operation

10
Positioning of the Main Approval Steps
11
Daya Bay Licensing Previous Steps
  • CREATION OF THE CHINESE NUCLEAR SAFETY NATIONAL
    ADMINISTRATION OCT, 1984
  • GENERAL COOPERATION AGREEMENT WITH DSN AND IPSN

    DEC, 1984
  • TRANSFER OF CODES
  • CATHARE
  • ESCADRE
  • ICARE
  • TRAINING BY IPSN TO SAFETY EVALUATION METHODS
  • (60 trainees)

12
Daya Bay Licensing Main Steps
  • SPECIFIC AGREEMENT WITH IPSN FOR DAYA BAY SAFETY
    EVALUATION APRIL 1986
  • PSAR EVALUATION 1987
  • DESIGN DOCUMENTS EVALUATION 1988-1990
  • FSAR EVALUATION 1991
  • EVALUATION OF COMMISSIONING TESTS PROGRAMS AND
    RESULTS 1990-1992

Along this process, Framatome ANP addressed more
than 3000 questions
13
Daya Bay Operation the Operators Quick Learning
  • Operation started in 1994
  • Excellent availability
  • In 2000, Daya Bay was above global average for
    seven out of ten WANO factors

Availability factorlearning curve
14
Ling Ao NPP
2 Reactors (990 MWe)
  • Improvements compared to Daya Bay

15
Ling Ao Licensing Main Steps
  • GENERAL COOPERATION AGREEMENT WITH DSIN
  • NOV.
    1995
  • GENERAL COOPERATION AGREEMENT WITH IPSN
  • DEC.
    1995
  • LING AO LICENSING BY THE CHINESE SAFETY
    ADMINISTRATION
  • SUPPORT PROVIDED THROUGH THE TWO AGREEMENTS

16
Suppliers Tasks for Ling Ao
  • Similar to Daya Bay
  • Identical Responsibilities for PSAR/FSAR Chapters

Along this process, Framatome ANP addressed less
than 300 questions
17
Suppliers Tasks for Backfittings
The NPP Supplier Assists the Operator in his
Relationship with the Safety Authorities during
the Whole Lifetime of the NPP
  • When additional justifications are required
  • When technical modifications on the installation
    influence the safety analysis report
  • When evolutions on the management methods or the
    fuel types influence the safety analysis report

18
Framatome ANP Engineering Services Plant
Performance Improvement
  • Plant nominal power uprating
  • Improved fuel management
  • Improved plant manoeuvrability
  • Improved plant availability
  • Contribution to outage duration reduction

19
Improved fuel management 18-month cycle Daya Bay
  • 1998 GNPJVC decides on a new strategy for fuel
    cycle management
  • 18-month cycle
  • 52 gwj/TU burnup
  • Enrichment 4,45
  • Contract to Framatome-ANP in 1998

20
Improved fuel management 18-month cycle Daya Bay
  • Transfer of tools and methods to institutes NPIC
    and BINE
  • Technology Transfer for fuel fabrication AFA 3G
    to Yibin
  • Assistance for AFA 3G licensing by NNSA
  • Assistance for 18-month fuel cycle licensing by
    NNSA
  • 2002 implementation of the 18-month fuel cycle
    for Daya Bay both Reactors

21
Design CertificationExample of The U.S. EPR
22
EPR Plot Plan
Safeguard Building 23 MCR
23
  • AREVAs goal is to deploy EPR plants in the US
  • AREVA has therefore decided to apply for design
    certification
  • EPR design is evolutionary so the design
    certification reviewis expected to be
    straightforward
  • Design Certification Document submittal end 2007
  • Several US utilities have expressed strong
    interestand consider the EPR as a viable option
    for future needs.

24
(No Transcript)
25
Status of U.S. EPR Licensing Activities
  • Design Certification (DC)
  • In Phase 2 of NRC pre-application review for
    design certification
  • Continued series of technical exchange meetings
  • Submittal of topical reports for review
  • Design Certification application to be submitted
    in December 2007
  • Combined License (COL)
  • UniStar Nuclear plans to submit at least four COL
    applications referencing the U.S. EPR
  • First UniStar Nuclear COL application to be
    submitted no later than June 2008

Licensing preparations on schedule to support
U.S. EPR deployment in 2015.
26
NRC Meetings and Submittals
  • Meetings with NRC for 2006
  • 14 meetings originally planned
  • 14 meetings completed
  • 2 more meetings planned
  • Pre-application submittals
  • 21 submittals planned
  • 5 reports submitted (on or ahead of schedule)
  • 7 more reports to be submitted in 2006

27
EPR Design Certification Time schedule
28
(No Transcript)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com