The 4th Annual Research and Evaluation of Adventure Programs Symposium Programs, Process, PowerPoint PPT Presentation

presentation player overlay
1 / 60
About This Presentation
Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: The 4th Annual Research and Evaluation of Adventure Programs Symposium Programs, Process,


1
The 4th Annual Research and Evaluation of
Adventure Programs SymposiumPrograms, Process,
Progress The March Towards Evidence-Based
Designation
  • Matt Claybaugh, Ph.D.
  • A. Scott Allred, LMFT
  • Marimed Foundation

2
Program
  • Who we are and what we do.

3
Process
  • Data in Data Out
  • Moving towards EBP designation

4
Progress
  • Where are we now
  • Barriers to success

5
Programs
  • How many of you believe/know you are using an
    evidence-based model in your program(s)?
  • How many of you are replicating a best
    practice, evidence-based or model program?

6
Marimeds Residential Programs
  • Kailana (Calm Seas) (est.1993 on Oahu)
  • and
  • Wahiolanonaopio (A Healing Place for Youth)
    (est. 2004 on Hawaii Island)
  • Residential treatment programs for
    adolescents needing comprehensive treatment and
    education, including mental health and substance
    abuse services.

7
Kailana Main Campus
8
Kailana Voyaging Houses
Hale Hoohua House to Bear Fruit
Hale Kauoha Kakou House of Our Will
9
Wahiolanonaopio Voyaging Houses
Wahiolanonaopio O Keaau Girls House
Wahiolanonaopio O Kapehu Boys House
10
Integrated Services
Experiential
Marimeds Model
Clinical
Educational
11
Culturally Aligned with Youth Population
12
Mauka to Makai
13
Loi Kalo, Animal Husbandry Farming
14
Culinary Arts
15
Ocean-Based Programming
16
Small Boat Sailing
17
Outrigger Canoe Paddling
18
Kiakahi Sailing Canoe
19
Hoailona Sailing Canoe
20
S.S.V. Makani Olu(gracious wind)
21
Five 5s
  • Organizational Values
  • Experiential Model
  • Interwoven Phase and Level System
  • CPI (Non Violent Crisis Intervention)
  • Behavioral Supports

22
1 Organizational Values
  • Community
  • Honesty
  • Aloha
  • Respect
  • Teamwork

23
2 Experiential Model
  • Welcome Aboard / Preparing for Sea
  • Departure / Commitment to the Voyage
  • Challenge / Windward Leg
  • Mastery / Wayfinding
  • Reflection / Storytelling

24
3 Phase and Level System
  • Phases of Treatment
  • I. Rapport Building Roles and Rules
  • II. Accepting Responsibility and Expressing
    Needs and Issues
  • III. Coping Skills
  • IV. Dealing with Past Issues that Continue to
    Impede Progress
  • V. Transferring Learning to New Life Settings

25
4. Crisis Prevention Institute
  • Non-Violent Crisis Intervention

26
5. Behavioral Supports
  • Making it Right
  • Restorative Justice
  • Cadet Council
  • Positive Incident Reports

27
(No Transcript)
28
I Mua Mau Ohana IMO
  • SAMHSA TCE Targeted Capacity Expansion
  • Joint Program Enhancement Award 2002 Marimed
    Foundation and Maui Youth and Family Services
  • Voyaging (For MYFS)
  • 12 month Continuing Care (All Islands)

29
Instrument
  • Utilized the Global Appraisal of Individual Needs
    (GAIN) Core Version
  • GAIN also contains SAMHSA Government Performance
    and Results Act (GPRA) Instrument

30
Baseline Findings
31
Demographics
  • Gender 71 male, 29 female, 1 TG
  • Average age 16 years old
  • Ethnicity 62 Native Hawaiian, 41 Caucasian,
    37 Asian, 24 other Pacific Islander, and 24
    Hispanic (many multi-ethnic)
  • Past 12 months living with 71 parent(s)
  • Treatment prior to intake
  • 58 received treatment before average1.2
    admissions
  • 51 felt they needed treatment

32
Criminal Justice Involvement
  • 87 had lifetime arrests

33
Education Employment
  • 89 of youth were enrolled in school or training
  • Only 5 reported engaging in some type of
    non-full-time work

34
Substance Use at Intake
35
Mental Health at Intake
36
General Crime at Intake
37
Outcome Findings
38
Arrests Past 90 Days
39
Days in Juvenile Detention Past 90 Days
40
Education
41
Employment
42
Substance Use
43
Substance Problem Scales
44
Emotional Problem Scale
45
Summary
  • Youth mostly Native Hawaiian and other Pacific
    Islander
  • Youth at intake showed high levels of criminal
    justice involvement, substance use, and both
    internal and external behavior problems.
  • Significant reduction in arrests and days in
    juvenile detention
  • Significant reductions in substance use and
    related substance problems
  • Significant reduction in emotional problems

46
Wahiolanonaopio
  • Received SAMHSA TCE Earmark for Methamphetamine
    Treatment 2004

47
Instruments
  • Wahiolanonaopio Survey
  • GAIN-Q
  • Family Management, Family Bonding, Self-Efficacy,
    Cultural Pride, School Bonding
  • Government Performance and Results Act (GPRA)
    Instrument

48
Data Collection
  • From July 1, 2004 to September 30, 2006
  • 58 total admissions
  • Baseline assessments
  • 52 GPRA
  • 46 Wahiolanonaopio surveys
  • Three-month assessments
  • 39 GPRA
  • 34 Wahiolanonaopio surveys
  • Six-month assessments
  • 32 GPRA
  • 27 Wahiolanonaopio surveys
  • 12-month assessments
  • 16 GPRA
  • 11 Wahiolanonaopio surveys

49
Demographics
  • Gender 69 male 31 female
  • Age range13-18, avg.15.7 years old
  • Education range6th-11th grade, avg.9.2 years

50
Ethnicity
51
Baseline ATOD UsePast 30 Days Youth
52
Qualitative Findings I
  • Sample of participants from the residential and
    day treatment programs were interviewed
  • Most participants felt they had changed
    positively, including increased acceptance of
    responsibility, honesty, problem solving, anger
    management, self-esteem, patience, positive
    attitudes, pro-social behaviors, academic
    performance, and remaining drug free
  • Some participants also felt their families and
    their relationships with their families changed
    for the better

53
Qualitative Findings II
  • Participants felt staff gave them support, hope,
    and skills to deal with their problems
  • Participants enjoyed the learning and experiences
    they acquired
  • When asked what was difficult about working with
    staff, participants mentioned lack of consistency
    and organization
  • Other concerns related to the location and living
    conditions of the home

54
Limitations of Findings
  • Small sample size
  • Selection bias due to follow-up survey
    completion rate
  • Cultural sensitivity of required measures
  • Social desirability

55
Summary I
  • Substantial decreases in AOD use at all
    follow-ups and reduced impact of AOD use at both
    6- and 12-month follow-ups.
  • Increasing improvements in high-risk behaviors at
    each follow-up.
  • Although decreases in enrollment in school, there
    was increased school functioning for youth still
    in school and increased engagement in work for
    other youth. Qualitative data also suggests some
    improvement in academics.

56
Summary II
  • While some increases in psychological/emotional
    problems revealed, decreases in external behavior
    problems also revealed. By 12 months,
    improvements shown in both internal and external
    behavior.
  • Increases in self-efficacy and cultural pride
    also shown at all follow-ups.
  • Although family functioning scales showed only
    slight improvements, qualitative data suggests
    some improvements.
  • Improvements in living conditions and number of
    youth receiving various types of treatment.

57
Where Are We Now?
  • Next Steps
  • Barriers

58
T. S. Eliot
We shall not cease from exploration And the end
of all our exploring Will be to arrive where we
started And know the place for the first
time. T.S. Eliot
59
Thank You
Senator Daniel Inouye Mayor Harry Kim (Hawaii
County) Billy Kenoi Char Shigemura All Hawaii
Treatment Providers and Educators Richard Kim,
Ph.D., The Catalyst Group, LLC
60
Mahalo
  • The end
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com