Do postcommon envelope objects form a distinct subset of PNe PowerPoint PPT Presentation

presentation player overlay
About This Presentation
Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Do postcommon envelope objects form a distinct subset of PNe


1
Do post-common envelope objects form a distinct
subset of PNe?
  • David J. Frew
  • Perth Observatory Macquarie University
  • Q.A. Parker and the MASH Collaboration

Asymmetrical Planetary Nebulae IV La Palma, 21
June 2007
2
The Solar Neighbourhood Sample
  • Database of potentially nearby PNe
  • Improved integrated fluxes in Ha and OIII
  • Combination of literature and new spectroscopic
    data, kinematic data, and CSPN photometry
  • Using revised/new distances, define a
    volume-limited sample within 1.0 kpc (presently,
    n 53)
  • Extending sample volume to 1.5 kpc and 2.0 kpc
    (in progress)

3
New giant PNe in the solar neighbourhood
PFP 1 (Pierce et al. 2004)
FP 0905-3033 (Frew et al., in prep.)
30
RCW 24 (Frew et al. 2006)
  • FP 1824-0321
  • (Frew et al., in prep.)

30'
30'
4
Planetary nebula or ionized ambient ISM
  • Sh 2-174, DeHt 5, RE 1738665, Sh 2-68, HDW 5
  • PG 0108101, PG 0109111, KPD 00055106, Hewett
    1
  • PHL 932, EGB 5
  • are not bona fide PNe, but simply ionized
    Strömgren spheres in ambient ISM
  • Can conclude that no DO white dwarf is physically
    associated with a PN
  • No sdB/sdOB (AGB-manqué) star has an associated
    ejecta nebula or PN

5
Ha SB radius relationAll calibrators (n 114)
log S(Ha) -3.42(0.21)log R 5.23(0.16)
6
High-excitation PNe (n 16)Close-binary PNe
(n 11)
HE PNe squares CE PNe triangles Others crosses
Increasing mass M ? S(Ha)½
7
  • Large high-excitation PNe (Kaler 1981)
  • Round, elliptical, or amorphous (filled-centre)
    morphologies
  • Large expansion velocities
  • RT instabilities often seen
  • Very high excitation HeII l4686 0.75 Hb and
    very weak or absent O II, N II and S II
    emission
  • CS is hot (Teff gt 100 kK), and luminous relative
    to nebular flux
  • Large scale height, z 340 pc
  • Low ionized masses 0.25 M?

8
The post-common envelope PN sample
  • 23 close-binary PNe from De Marco (2006, IAU
    Symp. 234)
  • Removed Abell 35, NGC 6302 and Sh 2-71
  • LoTr 5 and NGC 1514 are included, but have
    unknown orbital periods
  • Also added NGC 1360 (Bond Afsar 2005)
  • Sample of 21 objects
  • Selected 11 PNe with reliable distances and flux
    data, as calibrating objects

9
Sh 2-71 does not have a close binary nucleusThe
true CS has been misidentified in the literature
Credit Adam Block / KPNO
  • The true CS (mB 19) is directly at centre
    (arrowed)

10
Calibrating post-common envelope PNe
High excitation Inferred close binary (Afsar
Bond 2005)
11
Post-CE PNe Morphologies
NGC 2346
PHR 1818-1526
NGC 1360
NGC 6578
?
AAO/UKST Survey
Credit H. Bond / HST/ NASA
NGC 5979
Abell 65
SuWt 2
Shapley 1
AAO/UKST Survey
Credit ESA/ESO/NASA
DSS.
Filled-centre ellipticals
Bipolar and toroidal rings,
but no double-shell ellipticals
12
Post-CE PNe Properties
  • SB(Ha) 2.5 to 6.0 erg cm-2 s-1 sr-1 (0.2
    to 6.7)
  • Average ionized mass (post-CE PNe) 0.17 0.13
    M?
  • Average ionized mass (post-CE PNe, excluding HFG
    1) 0.13 0.08 M?
  • Average ionized mass 0.64 0.5 M? (non
    post-CE local PNe, restricted range of SB)
  • Post-CE PNe have low ionized masses. Extends
    conclusion of Bell et al. (1994) re Abell 63

13
Binarity of CSPN optical/near-IR colours (2MASS
and/or DENIS)
  • 53 PNe in solar neighbourhood (d 1.0 kpc)
  • 7 wide binaries, e.g. Ciardullo et al. 1999
    (6/6 with 2MASS data show excess at J, H and/or
    K)
  • 7 close binaries (4 have periods 5/6 in 2MASS
    show excess at J, H and/or K)
  • 3 more CSPN have excess at J, H and/or K
  • 16 show no IR excess
  • 21 PNe have no observational data
  • Of the 32 PNe with optical/near IR colours,
  • total binary fraction 53 (agrees with
    Duquennoy Mayor)
  • total close-binary fraction 13 - 31

14
Selection bias?
  • 2MASS photometry limit at J 16, Ks 15
  • Detection limit for CS companion is M0V M8V,
    depending on luminosity of CSPN
  • Alternatively, CS may have brown dwarf or cool WD
    companion, or be a merger product ...
  • but recall the Brown Dwarf Desert (e.g. Marcy
    Butler 2000, Armitage Bonnell 2002, Grether
    Lineweaver 2006).
  • Solar-type stars (i.e. PN progenitors) have an
    almost total absence of brown dwarf companions
    within 5 AU !!

15
The Brown Dwarf Desert
  • Figure from Grether Lineweaver (2006)

16
Conclusions future work
  • Close binary (post-CE) PNe have a distinct trend
    in SB-r space, shared by optically-thin, low
    mass, high-excitation PNe.
  • Post-CE PNe have low ionized masses and
    distinctive filled-centre, bipolar or toroidal
    morphologies.
  • Post-CE PNe comprise a minority of PNe. Should
    they be called true PNe?
  • Need to continue search for close-binary nuclei
    via time-series photometry and RV monitoring
  • Need deep BVRIJHK photometry of all CSPN in local
    volume-limited PN sample. Utilise UKIDSS, VHS
    data SPITZER
  • Single stars can do it !!
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com