WisDOTs Policy on Select Materials in Subgrades - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 29
About This Presentation
Title:

WisDOTs Policy on Select Materials in Subgrades

Description:

Change orders during construction are costly in time and money ... Soil Strength Numbers Arrived at Using DGI System, Based on Soil Pedology ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:88
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 30
Provided by: robertar
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: WisDOTs Policy on Select Materials in Subgrades


1
WisDOTs Policy on Select Materials in Subgrades
  • Frozen Four Workshop
  • Madison, WI
  • October 8, 2008

2
Presentation Highlights
  • Brief History and Introduction of WisDOT Select
    Materials Policy
  • Design Details and Information
  • Recent Research Findings

3
Historical Background
  • Mid-90s Subgrade Process Review
  • Address Cost Over-runs Attributed to Soils
  • Team Established - Findings
  • Greatest subgrade stress during construction
  • Few subgrade problems after paving
  • Do what is necessary to pave roadway
  • Change orders during construction are costly in
    time and money
  • About 2/3 of state has difficult soils

4
Historical Background Contd.
  • Recommendations From Study Team
  • Developed list of 22 items
  • Use of select materials in subgrades ranked as
    highest priority
  • Assemble a team to investigate further and
    provide guidance

5
Historical Background Contd.
  • Departmental Directions Team Goals
  • Use select materials in the upper portion
  • of subgrades
  • Limit the use to areas of difficult soils
  • Provide details/guidance for usage
  • Develop WisDOT policy for inclusion in
  • design manual (FDM)

6
Historical Background Contd.
  • Results of Team Discussions
  • Eight different methods/options of materials
  • Desire for all alternatives to provide
  • equivalent performance
  • Selection of particular alternative is based
  • on local conditions/availability /cost and
  • identified in the soils report
  • Estimate total impacts/costs
  • to the Department

7
Areas of Inclusion
8
Select Material Alternatives
  • Breaker Run Stone
  • Breaker Run Stone w/Geogrid
  • Grade 1 Granular Backfill
  • Grade 2 Granular Backfill or Select Borrow
  • Pit Run Sand and Gravel
  • Pit Run Sand and Gravel w/Geogrid
  • Flyash, Lime, Cement Stabilization
  • Salvage Materials or Industrial By-products
  • with optional Geogrid

9
Breaker Run Stone
10
Breaker Run Stone
  • Crushed Material From Quarry Face
  • Processed Through the Primary Crusher
  • Acceptance Based On Visual Inspection
  • Desire At least One Fracture Face on 50
  • of the R 1½ Material
  • Approximate Gradation -
  • Sieve Percent Passing
  • 5 100
  • 1½ 20 - 50
  • 10 0 - 10

11
Granular Backfills
12
Grade 1 2 Granular Backfills
  • Generally Sand Materials
  • Gradations -
  • Maximum Percent Passing
  • Sieve Grade 1 Grade 2
  • 4 100 100
  • 40 75 -
  • 100 15 30
  • 200 8 15

13
Pit Run Sand and Gravel
14
Pit Run Sand and Gravel
  • Obtained From Naturally Occurring Sand and Gravel
    Deposits
  • Minimum 50 Retained on 1½ Sieve
  • Approximate Gradation -
  • Sieve Percent Passing
  • 6 100
  • 2 0 - 75
  • 10 0 - 40

15
Stabilization and Recycled Matls
16
Drainage Implications
  • Drainage Concern With Thick Layers
  • Do Not Want to Create Bath-tub Sections
  • Complicated By Different Thicknesses
  • Special Cross-section Details Developed
  • Daylight Where Possible
  • Drains Where Necessary

17
Policy Guidelines
  • Use in Upper Portion of Subgrades Constructed in
    Difficult Soils as Shown on Plans Begin 2006
  • Will be Used in Identified Areas Unless Exception
    Justified in Soils Report
  • Will Not be Used in Areas Outside of Identified
    Areas Unless Justification is Provided
  • Soils Report Will Provide Recommendation of
    Appropriate Alternative Material
  • May be Used in Segments of Project (2000-3000)

18
Policy Guidelines Contd.
  • Use on Projects With Significant Earthwork
    Volumes
  • Will be Used in Both Cuts and Fills (Some
    exceptions for rock or dense cut areas)
  • One of Eight Alternative Designs Should be
    Selected and Shown on the Plan
  • Appropriate Bid Items Included in Plan
  • Considered Part of Subgrade
  • Must Adjust Earthwork Quantities
  • Account For in Pavement Design

19
Incorporating Benefits Into Pavement Design
  • Primary Purpose is to Facilitate Construction
  • Recognize that Subgrade is Improved
  • Realize That Some Benefit to Pavement Structure
  • Alternatives Reduce pavement structure or
    extend pavement life
  • Investigated Methods to Account for Benefits

20
WisDOT Pavement Design
  • Using Outdated AASHTO 1972 Methods
  • Compute Structural Numbers Using
  • Soil Support Value (SSV) for asphalt
  • Subgrade Modulus (k) for concrete
  • Soil Strength Numbers Arrived at Using DGI
    System, Based on Soil Pedology
  • Separate PCC and HMA Design Methods
  • Moving to New AASHTO MEPDG

21
Asphalt Pavement Design
Subgrade Strength Based on DGI and Correlated to
SSV
22
Concrete Pavement Design
  • Compute Pavement Thickness Using Standard Design
    Procedures
  • Deduct ½ inch From Computed Thickness
  • Recommendations Based on Sensitivity Analyses

23
Estimated Costs (For Planning)
Alternative Cost/Mile Breaker
Run Stone 110 k Breaker Run Stone
w/Geogrid 150 k Grade 1 Granular
Backfill 95 k Grade 2 Granular
Backfill or 95 k Select
Borrow Pit Run Sand and Gravel 105
k Pit Run Sand and Gravel 145 k
w/Geogrid Flyash, Lime, Cement Stabilization
90 k Salvage Materials or Industrial
100 k By-products Late-90s
24
Cost/Benefit
  • Est. Cost for Policy is 8 M - (180 Lane Miles)
  • Cost offset by reduced bid prices
  • Reduction in contractor claims
  • Reductions in contract administration costs
  • Other Benefits
  • Reduction in structural pavement designs
  • Provides solid base for paving operations
  • Reduction in future pavement rehab. costs

25
Recent Research In Area
  • Five Recent Research Projects With UW-Madison
  • One deals with geosynthetic reinforcement
  • Two deal with industrial byproducts/flyash
  • Two deal with equivalency of alternatives and
    inclusion into pavement design
  • Implementation Study

26
Summary of Recent Research
  • Major Findings
  • Provided recommended material thicknesses
  • Provided recommended modulus and layer
    coefficients for pavement design
  • Added geogrid-reinforced alternatives
  • Deleted breaker run geogrid option
  • Provided geogrid property recommendations
  • Investigated specific recycled and
  • stabilized materials

27
Research Recommendations
28
Future Directions
  • Review/Analyze Research Findings
  • Compare to Existing Knowledge/Guidelines
  • Potential Adoption of Results - Revision of
    Existing Guidelines
  • Continue Use of Select Materials

29
Questions/Comments ??
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com