Subseasonaldecadal linkage in Indian monsoon rainfall - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 24
About This Presentation
Title:

Subseasonaldecadal linkage in Indian monsoon rainfall

Description:

Dianosed states correspond sensibly with large-scale ... occurrence frequency (left, days/pentad) and mean intensity (precipitation amount on rainy days) ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:68
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 25
Provided by: amg73
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Subseasonaldecadal linkage in Indian monsoon rainfall


1
Subseasonal-decadal linkage in Indian monsoon
rainfall
  • Arthur M. Greene, Andrew W. Robertson
  • International Research Institute for Climate and
    Society
  • Palisades, NY USA
  • Sergey Kirshner
  • University of Alberta, Canada
  • amg_at_iri.columbia.edu

2
Synopsis
  • Homogeneous hidden Markov model is applied to a
    70-yr record of daily rainfall over a 13-station
    network in central-western India.
  • Dianosed states correspond sensibly with
    large-scale circulation composites, a dry state
    associated with monsoon breaks.
  • CCA indicates that interannual variability is
    associated with changes in frequency of
    occurrence (FO) of wet and dry states.
  • CCA applied to decadally-smoothed data shows very
    similar patterns, leading to
  • Conclusion Interdecadal variability also
    mediated by FO of wet and dry states, rather than
    by long-term changes in the character of the
    states themselves.

3
Outline
  • Data, model structure and assumptions.
  • Character of the diagnosed states.
  • Relationships to large-scale flow field.
  • Subseasonal variability ISO.
  • Interannual variability ENSO.
  • CCA, extension to the multidecadal scale.
  • Summary and conclusions

4
Dataset
  • Analysis based on a 70-yr record of daily JJAS
    rainfall data (GDCN).
  • 13-station network, west-central India.
  • Missing Only 11 days out of 8540 (average, no
    station missing more than 29 days).
  • Mean seasonal rainfall well-correlated with ISMR
    index (r 0.86), based on 300 stations.
  • Good agreement with a recent 1 gridded dataset
    produced by IMD.

5
Climatological occurrence probability, mean
intensity
JJAS Climatological rainfall probability (left),
and mean amount on rainy days.
6
Subseasonal cycle
Subeasonal cycle of occurrence frequency (left,
days/pentad) and mean intensity (precipitation
amount on rainy days).
7
Non-homogeneous hidden Markov model
  • Diagnostic tool (no external forcing).
  • Patterns of daily rainfall associated with
    hidden states.
  • States proceed in time according to a first-order
    Markov process.
  • Like a clustering or classification scheme, but
    with added (serial) time dependence.

8
HHMM schematic
  • Rt is a vector describing rainfall over the
    network at time t, St the corresponding scalar
    sequence of states. The subscript on S takes
    values ranging from 1 to K, where K is the number
    of states in the model. Rainfall on a particular
    day is assumed to depend only on that days state
    (and not, e.g., on the previous days rainfall.
    Day-to-day memory resides only in the states).
    The states are assumed to follow a first-order
    Markov process, with todays S dependent on
    yesterdays, but not (directly) on that of any
    previous day.

9
Station rainfall is described as a PDF
Rainfall amount on a particular day, conditional
on that days hidden state (St), depends on the
station (m). On wet days (r gt 0), station
rainfall is modeled as a mixture of two
exponentials (C 2). Parameters of the
exponential distributions (limc) are state- and
station-dependent, time-invariant.
10
Optimal number of states depends on application
11
Four-state decomposition
Top row shows occurrence probabilities for the
four states, bottom row the corresponding mean
daily intensities (average rainfall on wet days).
12
Viterbi sequence of most-likely states
  • Estimated state sequence, day by day.
  • Climatology (left) shows early and late
    predominance of dry state, JA predominance of
    states 3 and 1.
  • Aggregation (above) provides a perspective on
    interannual variability of state FO.
  • Note occurrences of the dry state during the peak
    rainy season (JA).

13
Monsoon breaks
  • Good match found between days on which state 4 is
    diagnosed and historical breaks identified by
    Gadgil and Joseph (2003).
  • Almost all (state-4) breaks are preceded by state
    1 no direct 3-4 or 4-3 transitions. Suggests
    dynamical processes at work
  • which leads in turn to consideration of ISO.

14
Climatological JJAS wind field (1951-1970)
Note Somali jet, centers of ascending motion in
Bay of Bengal, Eastern Arabian Sea.
15
State-associated wind composites
Wet (dry) state 3 (4) exhibits anomalous cyclonic
(anticyclonic) flow, ascending (descending)
motion. In state 1, anomalous ascent impinges on
the Himalayan escarpment state 2 shows anomalous
inflow from Bay of Bengal.
16
Vorticity composites suggest wavelike ISO
propagation
850-mb relative vorticity composities for
1951-1970. Most-likely state sequences (excluding
self-transitions) 4-2-3-1, 2-3-1, 3-1-3-1.
17
ENSO monsoon coupling
  • Expressed on the interannual time scale.
  • Warm events associated with poor monsoons.
  • Correlations between NINO3.4 index and the four
    FO time series are -0.18, -0.16, -0.45 and 0.56,
    respec-tively, the latter two values significant.
    Thus, there are fewer wet days, more dry ones,
    during warm ENSO events.
  • FO of the four states not independent method
    that accounts for their joint variability
    required CCA.

18
Canonical Correlation Analysis
  • Identifies pairs of patterns across two fields,
    such that the temporal correlation between
    members of a pair is maximized.
  • Useful, e.g., in the analysis of teleconnections.
  • Utilized here (a) A pseudo-field, consisting
    of the four state FO series, (b) the
    teleconnected station rainfall data.
  • Can reveal (a) how the state frequencies covary,
    and (b) how the canonical patterns of FO are
    related to rainfall patterns over the station
    network.

19
CCA Interannual variability
  • Applied here to high-passed series subdecadal
    frequencies filtered out.
  • First canonical mode Alternation between wet and
    dry states predomi-nance of the former
    associated with increased rainfall at all
    stations.
  • For this pattern, canonical correlation r 0.92,
    significant at 0.001.
  • Correlation of first FO canonical variate with
    ISMR, r 0.81.
  • First set of patterns explains 48 of variance in
    FO pseudofield, 33 in precipitation field.
  • Next two modes (not shown) explain 14, 12 of
    variance, respectively.

20
State FO at decadal scales
Here, the time series of state FO have been
low-pass filtered (11-yr moving average),
attenuating interannual variability. States 3 and
4 exhibit opposing long-term trends,
decadal-scale variations.
21
CCA Multidecadal variability
Interannual
Interdecadal
  • Applied to the smoothed series and rainfall
    records, CCA yields canonical patterns very
    similar to those of the annualized data.
    Amplitudes are smaller, but data is smoothed.
  • First three patterns explain 52, 24 and 7 of
    station rainfall variance, respectively.
  • Smoothed ISMR is well-correlated with first
    canonical FO variate r 0.85, p 0.015, on 5
    d.o.f.
  • Conclusion Decadal variations in monsoon
    rainfall can largely be attributed to integrated
    variations in FO, number of break days.

22
A few random notes
  • Large-scale circulation patterns characteristic
    of the monsoon seem to have been well-captured
    using data from only a small network of stations.
    Still, the eastern portion of the monsoon zone
    is not sampled may be possible to extract more
    (or more detailed) information using a larger
    network.
  • Large-scale nature of the monsoon may imply that
    most networks having adequate spatial sampling
    characteristics are capable of capturing the
    large-scale patterns of variability.
  • CCA reveals decadal-scale cross-pattern
    correlations, even though the states were defined
    on daily data. Monsoon breaks would be lost if
    averaging were performed prior to fitting the
    HMM, but have not attemped to fit to
    decadally-smoothed data.
  • Goswami and Mohan (2001) identify a linkage
    between intraseasonal and interannual scales, in
    which accumulated break/rainy days determine
    character of the years monsoon Similar to our
    decadal finding.
  • Coupling the HMM to a GCM variable (field, PC)
    permits exogenous driving of the transition
    matrix. Such a non-homogeneous model could, in
    principle, be used to simulate station-level
    rainfall under climate change.

23
Summary
  • Decomposition of 70-yr daily rainfall record over
    a 13-station network, using HHMM.
  • Reasonable relationship between diagnosed states
    and the large-scale wind fields.
  • Good correspondence between dry state and
    independently identified monsoon breaks.
  • CCA reveals linkage between state FO and station
    rainfall patterns.
  • This linkage persists across intraseasonal-interde
    cadal scales Break days add up!

24
Thank you!
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com