The Benefits of Publicly Financed Clinical Drug Trials - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 13
About This Presentation
Title:

The Benefits of Publicly Financed Clinical Drug Trials

Description:

The Benefits of Publicly Financed Clinical Drug Trials. By Dean Baker. Co ... Detailers push drugs (the pernicious use of free samples) Advertising to consumers ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:67
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 14
Provided by: gsppBe
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: The Benefits of Publicly Financed Clinical Drug Trials


1
  • The Benefits of Publicly Financed Clinical Drug
    Trials

By Dean Baker Co-Director Center for Economic
and Policy Research (CEPR), Washington, D.C.
2
Outline
  • The Problem of Monopoly Pricing
  • Deadweight Loss
  • Third Party Payers
  • Assymetric Information
  • Publicly Funded Clinical Trials as a Solution
  • International Issues

3
Deadweight Loss
200
180
160
140
Protected Price
120
100
Price per Prescription
80
60
Deadweight Loss
40
due to Patent
Protection
20
Competitive Price
0
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
1.00
1.20
1.40
1.60
1.80
2.00
Billions
Prescriptions
4
Basic Drug Facts
  • 3.5 billion prescriptions in the U.S. each year
  • Average generic costs 34 Average brand drug
    costs 120 Walmart generics cost 4
  • Spending will hit 330 billion in 2012 (CMS),
    perhaps 30 billion w/o patent protection.Protect
    ion in clothes/steel 10-30 percent, protection in
    prescription drugs 1000 percent

5
Third Party Payer
  • Insurers Insurance companies try to avoid
    paying, patients use legal and political action
  • Government almost 40 percent of costs are paid
    by government, more that 30 percent by the
    federal government (Medicare drug benefit)

6
Asymmetric Information - Drug companies know more
than doctors or patients
  • Conceal evidence that reflects badly on their
    drugs (Vioxx)
  • Detailers push drugs (the pernicious use of free
    samples)
  • Advertising to consumers

7
Solution Bring price down to marginal cost
  • Prize Fund Proposals
  • Direct Public Funding of Research
  • Public Funding of Clinical Trials (Lewis,
    Reichman and So, 2007)

8
Basic Plan
  • Limited number (8-12) of long-term (8-12 years)
    master contracts
  • Should support _at_ 20 billion a year of research
    could fully replace private level of funding
    (much less that potential saving on drugs to
    government)
  • Contractors could conduct own research or
    contract out
  • Continued, next slide

9
  • All findings (either by contractors or
    subcontractors) must be fully public and
    available for other researchers
  • Patentable findings are put into the public
    domain, subject to copyleft rules
  • Continued, next slide

10
  • Compensation for publicly paid tests
  • Price controls
  • Contracts that turn control over patents to
    government (payments based on use)
  • Drug companies could do their own tests
  • Price controls could apply regardless
  • Drug companies will have to compete with generics
  • FDA should give greater scrutiny to drugs not
    tested by independent testers

11
Advantages of Publicly Funded Clinical Trials
  • Lower cost drugs prices would be a non-issue
  • Honest research findings
  • Eliminate unnecessary duplicative research
    (copycat drugs)
  • Better research (huge databases)
  • Drive out detailers, direct to consumer
    advertising

12
International Aspects
  • Wealthy Countries treaties to share in expense
    (Love and Hubbard)
  • Middle-income countries and lower-income
    countries pay less or nothing (scaled to income)

13
Conclusion
  • Current system of patent protection for drugs
    leads to enormous economic inefficiency and
    inferior health outcomes.
  • Publicly funded clinical trials can be an
    effective mechanism for bringing prices closer to
    marginal cost. They can both save money and
    improve treatment.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com