Proton Pump Inhibitors, revealing new side effects - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 23
About This Presentation
Title:

Proton Pump Inhibitors, revealing new side effects

Description:

Annually, 20-40% of the general population experience dyspepsia or GERD ... Look at patients with pernicious anemia or surgical vagotomy to see if complete ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:620
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 24
Provided by: andres
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Proton Pump Inhibitors, revealing new side effects


1
Proton Pump Inhibitors, revealing new side effects
  • Andres Marin, MD
  • September 2007

2
Use of proton pump inhibitors and the risk of
community-acquired pneumonia
  • Archives of Internal Medicine
  • May 2007. 167 950-955.

3
Background
  • Annually, 20-40 of the general population
    experience dyspepsia or GERD
  • PPIs and H2RAs are among the most frequently
    prescribed drugs
  • Between 1995 and 2000, 300 increase in PPI use
    (Denmark)
  • These medicines effectively reduce gastric acid
    secretion and raise gastric pH

4
Background Cont.
  • Intragastric acidity constitutes a major
    nonspecific defense mechanism of stomach ingested
    pathogens
  • Normal gastric environment has pH below 4
  • Effective tx. With PPIs and H2RAs maintain
    gastirc pH above 4 for at least 18 hours
  • Theory that acid suppressive therapy may lead to
    insufficient elimination, or colonization of
    ingested pathogens

5
Background Cont
  • Use of PPIs have previously been associated with
    lower GI infections (Salmonella, Campylobacter,
    C-diff.)
  • Nested case-control study in 2004 by Laheij et
    al. reported association between gastric-acid
    suppressive therapy and increased risk of CAP
    (JAMA 20042921955-60)
  • Current study tested this association in larger
    population

6
Methods
  • Population-based case control study using linked
    data from 4 registries
  • A) Patient Registry County of Fumen, Denmark
  • B) Danish Civil Registry
  • C) Odense University Pharmacoepidemiological
    Database
  • D) Department of Clinical Microbiology at Odense
    University Hospital

7
Methods Cont.
  • Cases (n7642) All ages defined by first
    admission with CAP (ICD-10 codes) 2000-2004 .
  • Controls (n34,176) Randomly extracted and
    frequency matched by age and sex and assigned a
    random index date
  • Cases could also be extracted as controls prior
    to CAP (index date)
  • Exclusion Criteria Malignancy, hospital
    discharge within 7 days of index date

8
Methods Cont.
  • Exposure Definition Considered exposed if had
    redeemed a Rx for PPI within 90 days of index
    date (current use)
  • If filled Rx over 90 days before index date, then
    considered past users
  • Data Analysis Unconditional Logistic Regression
    calculating crude and adjusted ORs

9
Results
  • 7642 cases identified, and 34176 controls
  • 10.7 of cases and 4.6 of controls were current
    PPI users
  • Cases generally more burdened by chronic
    diseases than were controls

10
Results Cont.
  • Adjusted OR associating current PPI use with CAP
    was 1.5 (95CI, 1.3-1.7)
  • No significant association was found for past
    PPI use
  • No significant association was found for current
    or past H2RAs use
  • Attributable proportion, ie, fraction of CAP
    potentially caused by PPIs was 4

11
Results Cont.
Big Drop in OR when adjusting for Confounders
No Dose Response
12
Results Cont.
  • Stratum Specific Results
  • Overall, little variation for subgroup analysis.
  • PPI users younger than 40 had Adj. OR2.3 (95
    CI, 1.3-4.0)
  • Subjects with no previous hospitalization had
    Adj. OR1.8 (95 CI, 1.0-3.2)
  • Subjects who had not received abx. during 90 days
    prior to index date had Adj. OR1.6 (CI, 1.4-1.8)
  • PPI users with cirrhosis also had above average
    ORs (OR, 4.6 95 CI, 1.3-17.2)

13
Results
14
Results
Association between current use of PPIs and CAP,
according to the timing of first PPI prescription
15
Discussion
  • Their results show that current use of PPI was
    moderately associated with CAP. Overall, it was
    a large, truly population based observational
    study with many strengths.BUT WE MUST DIG DEEPER

16
Discussion
  • Potential Problems
  • Selection Bias Only included hospitalized
    patients. Also, cannot account for PPI
    non-adherence
  • Protopathic Bias Symptoms of CAP could have been
    misinterpreted as reflux leading to PPI
    prescription
  • Reflux is associated with some airway symptoms
    (ie. cough) that could lead to a dx of CAP
  • ETOH and smoking, known risk factors for both
    reflux and CAP, were not directly adjusted for
  • Possible additional residual confounding by
    unmeasured co-morbid conditions/general frailty

17
Discussion
  • Support theory
  • Problems supporting theory
  • Large population based study
  • Young PPI users greater OR
  • Greater OR with no history of antibiotics
  • Greater OR with 1st hospitalization
  • Strong temporal relationship
  • No increase in OR with airborne pathogens
  • OBSERVATIONAL STUDY
  • Used Frequency matched controls
  • Likely residual confounders
  • No dose-response relationship found
  • No cumulative dose response
  • No response with H2RAs

18
Discussion Reevaluating the mechanistic
explanation
  • Results may support association, but acid
    suppression as etiological explanation does not
    add up since no association with H2RAs
  • Other possible theories include
  • PPIs inhibit immune function
  • People with reflux may aspirate gastric contents
    -gt dx of CAP
  • Others? Feel free to propose theories

19
Future Studies
  • RCT may not be practical. Could analyze pooled
    data from RCTs of PPIs to look at differences in
    rates of CAP (power issues)
  • Can repeat analyze data looking as associations
    with other common medications to see if
    association is specific for PPIs
  • Repeat using time series analysis
  • Repeat using Nested Case-Control Analysis
  • Look at patients with pernicious anemia or
    surgical vagotomy to see if complete acid
    suppression increases CAP risk

20
Bottom line
  • Though etiology is unclear, there is likely a
    moderate association between PPI use and CAP.
  • In general, not a problem since risk for
    developing CAP is low
  • However, I would be careful in those who are at
    risk of PNA, and in whom PNA is a major source of
    mortality (asthma, COPD, immunocompromised,
    children and elderly)

21
Adults admitted to SFGH FMIS and GMIS
Courtesy of Drs. Todd May and Katie Murphy
22
Thank You Dr.THom
23
References
  • Gulmez et al. Use of Proton Pump Inhibitors and
    the Risk of Community-Aquired Pneumonia A
    Population-Based Case-Control Study. Archives of
    Internal Medicine. May, 14, 2007 167 (9)
    950-955
  • Laheij RJ, Sturkenboom MC, Hassing RJ, Dieleman
    J, Stricker BH, Jansen JB. Risk of community
    acquired pneumonia and use of gastric
    acid-suppressive drugs. JAMA. 2004 292
    1955-1960
  • Mayhar E., Pharm, D. Ali, S. Pharmacoepidemiology
    I A Review of Pharmacoepidemiologic Study
    Designs. Pharmacotherapy. 2004 24(8) 964-969
  • Mayhar E., Pharm, D. Pharmacoepidemiology II The
    Nested Case-Control Study-A Novel Approach in
    Pharmacoepidemiologic Research. Pharmacotherapy.
    2004 24 (9) 1105-1109
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com