Vaccines related epidemiology Programme design and policy options - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 41
About This Presentation
Title:

Vaccines related epidemiology Programme design and policy options

Description:

hepatitis B, pertussis, influenza, pneumococcus (PPV), tick born encephalitis (regionally) ... Accellular pertussis vaccine (aP and aP-containing vaccines) 25 ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:73
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 42
Provided by: ktl3
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Vaccines related epidemiology Programme design and policy options


1
Vaccines related epidemiologyProgramme design
and policy options
  • First EpiTrain course in
  • Advanced Epidemiology
  • Jurmala Latvia 29.10.2004
  • Hanna Nohynek
  • KTL Helsinki Finland

2
Vaccination Policy Options
?
Eradication Activities
New Vaccine Introduction
Newer Vaccine Research and Development
Outbreak vs routine control of epidemic diseases
3
(No Transcript)
4
Evolution of Immunization Programmes
5
When planning vaccinating (an individual or) a
population

Vaccine efficacy
Severity of disease
Risk to contract
Adverse events
Coverage
Price
6
Basic questions when introducing new vaccines
into a national programme
  • Is the vaccine efficacious enough and safe ?
  • Is there big enough vaccine preventable disease
    burden in the country ?
  • Is the public aware of the importance of the
    disease ?
  • Is the vaccine coverage good ?
  • How could the vaccine be introduced into the
    national schedule ?
  • How can the country assure availability of the
    vaccine in long term ?

7
Decision making processes for introducing new
vaccines vary greatly in industrialized countries
  • Reasons
  • national health systems in place
  • funding basis of programme
  • gross national product
  • national prioritization health vs. other
    values
  • within health

8
Case Finland Rationale and aims of changes in
programme 2001-
  • Opportunity to make major revisions
  • arising from decision to stop national vaccine
  • production (to end by December 2004)
  • Best possible/affordable protection to whole
    population
  • National consensus process
  • Revisions need to base on scientific evidence and
    cost effectiveness evaluation
  • Carefully controlled implementation
  • Follow up of implementation and evaluation of
    effectiveness

9
National vaccination programme in 2001
Age
Vaccine
Injections
lt1 weeks
BCG
3 mo
DTwP
4 mo
DTwP Hib
5 mo
DTwP
6 mo
Polio Hib
12 mo
Polio
14-18 mo
MMR Hib
20-24 mo
DTwP polio
10
Possible programmatic changes discussed
  • New combination vaccine
  • to replace wP in DTwP

Reductions / omissions BCG
Add ons hepatitis B, pertussis, influenza,
pneumococcus (PPV), tick born encephalitis
(regionally)
New vaccines varicella, pneumococcus (PCV),
(meningococcus C)
11
Costs of the Finnish nEPI
Population 5.2 mi, birth cohort 60 000
12
nEPI costs...
13
Costs of new nEPI ?
5 - fold difference !
14
Roles and responsibilities in decision making
for nEPI
15
Disease / vaccine specific subgroup reports
VE evidence categorized according to EBM
  • Pertussis
  • BCG
  • Varicella
  • Influenza
  • Pneumococcus (PPS, PCV)
  • Combination vaccines
  • Hepatitis B
  • TBE

Cost effectiveness analyses
16
New decision making process adopted 4 steps
approach
  • Factors to consider
  • 1) Expected public health benefit
  • 2) Safety of vaccine individually
  • 3) Safety effects on population level
  • 4) Benefit / cost of vaccine

17
Outcome of the 4 step evaluation for 7PCV
  • 1) Expected public health benefit

18
Efficacy of PncCRM vaccine
3ISPPD 2002
19
Invasive Pnc infections in Finland in 1995-99
Cases/year
Incidence/100 000/year
7PCV serotype coverage
49,4
67,5
Age, years
Source National Register for Infectious
Diseases
20
Incidence of pneumonia strongly affected by case
definition
Also has an impact on expected VE of PCV
21
Incidence of Acute Otitis Media
FinOM cohort
Pilot study
AOM is most common among children 7-12 mo of age.
AOM / 100 childmonth
All AOM
AOM by Pnc
Kilpi et al. Pediatr Infect Dis J 200120654-62
22
Pnc disease burden in Finland
Birth cohort 60 000 Universal use of 7PCV
potentially prevents annually 50 - 60 cases
of IPD 500 - 1 800 cases of
pneumonia 10 000 episodes of AOM 2 400 otologic
surgery procedures
23
4 steps approach for 7PCV
  • 1) Expected public health benefit
  • 2) Safety of vaccine
  • large scale RC trials demonstrated safety
  • on individual level

24
4 steps approach for 7PCV
  • 1) Expected public health benefit
  • 2) Safety of vaccine
  • 3) Population level effects
  • herd effect
  • ?/- replacement

25
4 steps approach for 7PCV
  • 1) Expected public health benefit
  • 2) Safety of vaccine
  • 3) Population level effects
  • herd effect, ? replacement
  • 4) Benefit / cost of vaccine
  • - with 4 doses

26

Costs of introducing 7PCV into national program
Salo H et al. ESPID 2003
27
Cost effectiveness of 7PCV in Finland
  • 1) The price of 7PCV should be third (half) the
    price
  • 2) Effect of reducing number of 7PCV doses and/or
    using 23PncPS for boosting needs to be evaluated
  • 3) Benefits quality of life gt life years saved
  • Salo H et al. ESPID 2003

28
Conclusion from step 4 evaluation
  • Introduction of 4 doses of 7PCV
  • would almost triple the costs of universal
    childhood vaccination program
  • compared to the 2001 level,
  • even if all savings achieved
  • by reduced disease burden
  • were taken into account.
  •  

29
Final conclusion
  • Expert consensus even if pneumococcus causes
    substantial public health disease burden, 7PCV is
    safe and possibly has positive herd effect
    extending to older age groups, 7PCV is not cost
    efficacious if given according to the recommended
    4-dose schedule therefore, at the time being
    7PCV is not recommended to be implemented into
    national vaccination program in Finland.

30
Further comment by WG
  • Introduction of new vaccines
  • should not be compared to
  • introduction of old vaccines
  • Right comparision new vaccines vs. any other
    preventive health intervention (screening for
    prostate cancer, hip replacement, etc.)

31
Further comment by WG
  • 1. Introduction of new vaccines should not be
    compared to introduction of old vaccines
  • Right comparision new vaccines vs. any other
    preventive health intervention (screening for
    prostate cancer, hip replacement, etc.)
  • 2. Any health intervention to be introduced
    should have a firm scientific evidence base
  • 3. Limited resources should be targeted at
    interventions with equal benefit obtained with
    least amount of costs

Shift of paradigm !
32
In October 2004, Finland is
  • Getting ready to introduce a new routine infant
    immunization programme
  • without 7PCV (January 2005-gt)
  • Recalculating costs and benefits taking into
    consideration accumulating evidence of the
    effects of 7PCV (herd immunity, need of less than
    4 doses, replacement)

33
National vaccination programme in 2004
Age
Vaccine
Injections
lt1 weeks
BCG
3 mo
DTwP
4 mo
DTwP Hib
5 mo
DTwP
6 mo
Polio Hib
12 mo
Polio
14-18 mo
MMR Hib
20-24 mo
DTwP polio
34
National vaccination programme in 2005
Age
Vaccine
Injections
lt1 weeks
BCG
3 mo
DTaP-Polio-Hib
4 mo
5 mo
DTaP-Polio-Hib
6 mo
12 mo
DTaP-Polio-Hib
14-18 mo
MMR
20-24 mo
35
Hep B immunization policy WHO European Region,
2004
36
Haemophilus influenza type b immunizationWHO
European Region 2004
Source Joint reporting form as of 30/09/2004
37
Hib3 coverage in the WHO European Region 2003
38
Annual incidence of Hib meningitis in childrenlt5
years of age before the introduction of
immunization based on about 70 studies in
countries of the WHO European Region
39
Other new and under-used antigens in the
European Region (as shown on the WHO/UNICEF
Joint Reporting Forms for 2003)
  • Accellular pertussis vaccine (aP and
    aP-containing vaccines)
  • 25 countries (WE and CCEE)
  • Meningococcal conjugate vaccine
  • 10 WE countries
  • Pneumococcal conjugate vaccine
  • 6 WE countries
  • Varicella vaccine
  • 2 WE countries

How accurate is this information?
40
Vaccine programmes for the rich vs. poor
  • Rich DTP, IPV, MMR HBV, Hib Varicella,
    PCV
  • Influenza
  • Poor BCG, DTP, OPV, M HBV, (Hib)
  • -gt GAVI

41
(No Transcript)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com