Title: Characteristics of general practitioners associated with higher immunisation coverage
1Characteristics of general practitioners
associated with higher immunisation coverage
- Nikki Turner, Cameron Grant, Felicity
Goodyear-Smith, Helen Petousis-Harris, Deon York,
Rhys Jones, Jackie Copp
2(No Transcript)
3Aim To determine characteristics associated
with GPs working in practices that achieve higher
immunisation coverage and better timeliness of
delivery
4Design
- Part of larger project seeking to determine the
contribution that different health care system
factors make to immunisation coverage and
timeliness at the general practice level. - Survey of random sample 124 General Practices 70
Auckland, 54 Midland region - 38 decline rate, no difference in a range of
characteristics no. enrollees, high needs,
ethnicity, social deprivation
5Methods
- Practice immunisation coverage via electronic
audit of PMS - registered and enrolled immunised
- registered and enrolled delayed
- Correct sequence and date assumption
- Third dose assumption
- GP knowledge and attitudes
- 1 randomly selected GP per practice
- CATI
- Questionnaire adapted from previous NZ and UK
questionnaires - Descriptive analysis of coverage and doctor
knowledge and attitudes - Multivariate analysis of how various GP factors
were associated with coverage and timeliness
62. Results sources of information
- gt 90 GPs information sourced from
- PN
- NZ Immunisation Handbook
- Internet main source for 61 (54)
- CDC, MOH, WHO, IMAC, Google
- Other sources IMAC newsletter, Well
- Child Book, CME
7 Immunisation information sources
83. Results perceived barriers to achieving
immunisation
94. Results comfort with their knowledge
- 96 believed immunisation to be important or
very important. - 5 GPs did not consider it important
- 93 were comfortable or very comfortable with
their knowledge
105. Results - knowledge
- 87 correct vaccine storage temperature 2
80C - 25 identified what CARM stood for
- 45 egg Allergy not contraindication to MMR
- 67 Treatment for leukaemia contraindication to
MMR - 20 stated they would delay MMR if child had
snuffly cold
11Contraindications to MMR vaccine in a child
125. Results age to immunise
- 88 (99) indicated 6 weeks
- 1 recommended 10 weeks, 3 recommended 12 weeks
- 9 (10) stated 6 weeks is too young /sometimes
too young
136. Results GP Educational Needs
147. Results no association with practice
coverage
- Gender
- Comfortable with their knowledge of immunisation
- Rural versus non-rural
- Correctness of knowledge about true and false
contraindications to measles and pertussis
immunisation, except for identifying leukemia as
a contraindication
157. Results - associations with practice
coverage
- GPs who immunised (8) of practices
- - no difference in coverage but more likely to
have timely delivery - After adjustment for social deprivation of the
practice, GP perception that parental apathy was
a barrier was associated with lower coverage (P
0.01) and more delay (p0.02) - More frequent use of the Immunisation Handbook
associated with higher practice coverage (lt0.02)
and less delay (p0.007) - Practices where GP correctly identified what
CARM stood for had higher coverage0.006) and
timeliness (p0.008) - Practices with GP who correctly identified
leukaemia as a contraindication to MMR had higher
coverage (p0.01)
16Table 4.5.15 Associations of general practitioner
characteristics and their perceptions of parental
barriers to immunisation with immunisation
coverage and delay
17Conclusions
- Timely delivery more likely in practices where
GPs also vaccinate - Practices with GPs who have increased use of
immunisation resources had better coverage and
timeliness - GP correctness of knowledge not usually
associated with practice coverage or timeliness
18Concerns
- 12 GPs who consider 6 weeks may be too young to
start immunising - 4 of GPs did not consider immunisation to be
important - Significant GP knowledge gaps
- Though may not be impacting hugely on
immunisation coverage overall (role of PN)