Emerging Market Finance

1 / 34
About This Presentation
Title:

Emerging Market Finance

Description:

Evidence on Illiquidity Discounts ... Discounts on Illiquid Bonds ... To first examine price discounts, we use two sets of data: the auction data ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:65
Avg rating:3.0/5.0

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Emerging Market Finance


1
Emerging Market Finance
  • Lecture 11 Valuation of Illiquid Securities
  • Challenge shares and other securities are often
    illiquid in emerging markets! How much should you
    value them?

2
Evidence on Illiquidity Discounts
  • Silber (1991) Rule 144 letter stocks average
    discount of 34 (based on 69 private
    transactions, from 1981-88)

3
Discount Size and Firm Characteristics the U.S.
Sample
4
Discounts on Illiquid Bonds
  • Amihud and Mendelson (1991) and Kamara (1994)
    yield spread between illiquid notes and liquid
    Treasury bills 35 basis points.
  • Boudoukh and Whitelaw (1991), the yield spread
    50 basis points between designated benchmark
    bond and less liquid government bonds in Japan.

5
Chinas Experience with Illiquid Stocks
  • State Shares owned by the state and not publicly
    tradable
  • Restricted Institutional Shares (RIS) held only
    by institutions (financial and otherwise), and
    never publicly tradable
  • Floating common shares A-shares and B-shares

6
The Rules
  • State shares can only be transferred to other
    institutions privately
  • RIS shares are officially only transferable via
    private search and negotiations. But, since Dec.
    1998, auction houses have been selling RIS shares
    in semi-public auctions
  • Regardless of share type, no short-selling is
    allowed.

7
Typical Ownership Pie
8
To first examine price discounts, we use two sets
of data the auction data
  • 2,577 RIS auction transactions from August 2000
    to June 2001, on 18 auction houses mostly in
    Shanghai. Total stocks auctioned 258
  • Auctions take place on weekends and evenings
  • Participants have to be institutions (mostly,
    private-fund management firms)
  • Auction houses advertise in advance

9
Private-Placement Sample
  • 242 transactions
  • Aug. 2000 to July 2001
  • Much larger blocks

10
Summary Statistics for Auctions
11
What Does the Discount Mean?
  • Suppose you have two firms with identical future
    cashflow and operating under identical
    environments
  • But, firm A is publicly traded, while firm B is
    privately owned.
  • Then, firm Bs worth is only 21 of firm As,
    simply because firm B is private!

12
Summary Statistics for Private Placements
13
Discounts across B/M Groups
Blue auctions Red private-trans.
14
Discounts by Auction Quantity
Blue auctions Red private-trans.
15
Discounts by Fraction of RIS Shares in Ownership
Structure
Blue auctions Red private-trans.
16
Discounts by Age (since IPO)
Blue auctions Red private transfers
17
Future Investment Returns in RIS
  • Assume the trading restriction is lifted in T
    years (uncertainty). Share price at time of
    lifting is unknown. Adopt buy hold

18
Are the RIS Auction Prices Reasonable?
  • The answer lies in the rules.
  • Three rules are binding, each causing a
    distortion
  • RIS shares not tradable, but transferable
  • No short-selling allowed (binding for floating
    shares)
  • RIS shares only for institutions, not for the
    public.
  • Lets look at two types of models.

19
Longstaffs (1995) Model
  • Assumption the illiquid stock is locked up for
    some T years (not tradable at all).
  • Then, the upper bound on the price discount

20
Longstaffs (1995) Model
21
Upper Bounds on Illiquidity Discounts Longstaff
(1995) Model
22
Amihud and Mendelson (1986) Model
  • Liquid stock no trading costs
  • RIS transferable privately, but not tradable
    publicly, means it is MORE costly to exchange
    ownership
  • Let c be the search/transaction cost for RIS
    (whenever there is a buy or sell).
  • Put aside the no-short-selling aspect for now.
  • Then, relative to the fair value of a floating
    share, the discount for RIS is d PV(all
    future transaction costs)

23
Table for Fair Non-Marketability Discount
(without short-selling constraint)
  • Assume c 5. T of yrs before lifting, t
    of yrs in a typical RIS holding period.Cost of
    capital 10 per year

Years before lifting restriction
24
Discount due to No-Short-Selling
  • With No-Short-Selling, stock prices can be far
    above fundamentals, yet no one can do anything
    about it.
  • Due to its emerging-market status, suppose the
    right P/E for China is 30.
  • Relative to the floating-share price, a
    reasonable discount should beNo-Short-Selling
    discount Non-Marketability discount

25
Illiquidity Discounts based on Amihud
Mendelson (1985)
26
Restricted vs Floating Shares a cause for other
things
  • Everyone wants to go IPO! No one wants to stay
    private, even if it means they have to take risk
    and make up the numbers!
  • With relatively few shares floating, easy to
    manipulate common share prices!
  • leading to pyramid corporate family empire.

27
With such discounts, every public corp. will be
run like a hedge fund
  • With the RIS shares priced so low, takes only
    little capital to acquire a controlling
    shareholder position
  • The price discount for RIS shares relative to
    floating A-shares is so high (84 avg.) that
    every firm wants to be a hedge fund
  • Long RIS (or, state shares) and get the right to
    short floating A-shares.

28
Hedge Fund Strategy
Pay 0.16 to acquire an RIS or state share, to
become controlling shareholder
Transfer cash through related-party transactions
Sell floating A-shares to public at 1 per share.
Public Company ABC
29
Sample for the Control Premium
  • 154 private transfers of state-owned shares (SOS)
    to other state-owned enterprises (SOE) (with 91
    transfers involving controlling blocks and the
    other 63 transfers non-controlling blocks)
  • 17 transfers of controlling SOS share blocks to
    private firms, and 3 non-controlling SOS share
    blocks to private firms.

30
Control Premium Size
SOS price premium relative to book value of
equity per share
Control Blocks to SOEs
Non-Control Blocks to SOEs
Non-Control Blocks to private firms
Control Blocks to private firms
31
Control Premium Relative to Floating A-Share
Prices
Control Blocks to SOEs
Non-Control Blocks to SOEs
Non-Control Blocks to private firms
Control Blocks to private firms
32
Control Premium Relative to Revenue Per Share
Control Blocks to SOEs
Non-Control Blocks to SOEs
Non-Control Blocks to private firms
Control Blocks to private firms
33
ROE Across Groups
Control Blocks to SOEs
Non-Control Blocks to SOEs
Non-Control Blocks to private firms
Control Blocks to private firms
34
ROA across Groups
Control Blocks to SOEs
Non-Control Blocks to SOEs
Non-Control Blocks to private firms
Control Blocks to private firms
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)