Title: Pistonless Dual Chamber Rocket Fuel Pump
1Pistonless Dual Chamber Rocket Fuel Pump
- Steve Harrington, Ph.D.
- 4-02-03
2LOX/Jet-A Pressure Fed Design Working Well
Whats Next? More Altitude!
3The Problem is Mass Ratio How to Make a
Lightweight, Inexpensive Rocket with a Large Fuel
Capacity.
- For performance, a rocket must have large,
lightweight propellant tanks - Pressure fed tanks are heavy and/or expensive and
safety margins cost too much in terms of
performance. - Turbopumps require massive engineering effort and
are expensive. - The solution is the The Dual Pistonless Pump
- Simple to design and manufacture and with
performance comparable to a turbopump
4Outline
- Discuss basic pump design concept
- Introduce latest pump innovations
- List pump advantages over turbopump and pressure
fed systems. - Present pump test results
- Derive calculation of pump thrust to weight ratio
which show that a LOX/RP-1 pump has a T/W of over
700
5First Generation Design
- Drain the main tank at low pressure into a small
chamber. - Pressurize the small chamber and feed to the
engine. - Run two in parallel, venting and filling one
faster than the other is emptied
More info at www. rocketfuelpump.com
6Second Generation Design
- Main chamber vents and fills quickly through
multiple check valves. - One main chamber and one auxiliary chamber,
less weight than two chambers of equal size - Pump fits in tank, simplified plumbing
- Concentric design maintains balance.
- Model has been built and tested (patent pending)
7Advantages
- Much lighter than pressure fed system at similar
cost. - At one to two orders of magnitude lower
engineering and manufacturing cost than
turbopump. - Low weight, comparable to turbopump.
- Quick startup, shutdown. No fuel used during
spool up. - Can be run dry. No minimum fuel requirement.
- Less than 10 moving parts. Inherent reliability.
- Inexpensive materials and processes.
- Negligible chance of catastrophic failure.
- Scalable, allows for redundant systems.
8Engineering Cost Dual Pistonless Pump
- Check Valves
- Level Sensors
- Pressure vessels
- These parts are available off the shelf
- Control System (microprocessor or logic circuit)
Pump model made from industrial/consumer parts 4
MPa, 1.2 kg/sec, 7 kg
9Engineering cost Turbopumps
- Fluid Dynamics of rotor/stator
- Bearings
- Seals
- Cavitation
- Heat transfer
- Thermal shock
- Rotor dynamics
- Startup
- Shut down
10Development Issues
- Pressure Spikes in output may require accumulator
or valve timing adjustment - Currently uses slightly more gas than pressure
fed system. can use less with pressurant heating. - Not invented here.
- No experience base, must be static tested and
flown.
11Pump Performance
- Pump performance close to target of 1.5 kg/sec at
4 Mpa - Pressure spikes have been reduced. Requires more
development. - Pump chamber vents and pressurizes more quickly
when running on Helium - Pump needs to be tested with LN2 and Jet-A
Pump running on compressed air at room
temperature, pumping water.
12Pistonless Pump Mass Calculation
Chamber Mass
Spherical Chamber Volume and Diameter
Combine Equations to get Chamber Mass as a
function of flow rate
Chamber Thickness in terms of fuel pressure and
maximum stress
13Pistonless Pump Thrust to weight Ratio
Calculation
Thrust for Ideal Expansion
- Assumptions
- Auxiliary chamber is 1/4 the size of main chamber
- Valves and ullage add 25 to mass
- Total pump mass is 1.252 or1.56 times main
chamber mass 1/(1.561.5).43
Pump thrust to weight
14Typical Pump Thrust/Weight Calculations
Assumptions
- Rocket Chamber Pressure 4 MPa
- Pump cycle time 5 seconds.
- Sea level Specific Impulse from Huang and Huzel ,
- Pump Chambers are 2219 aluminum, 350 MPa design
yield strength, 2.8 specific gravity
15 Conclusions/ Future Plans
- Pump weight and cost are low and it works as
designed. - Next steps
- Static test and fly pump with Flometrics rocket
technology. - Combine with low cost ablative engines and low
cost vehicles for low cost access to space.
NASA Fastrac
Beal BA 810
TRW Low Cost Pintle Engine
Microcosm Scorpius