Title: Tracking studies of the CLIC BDS
1Tracking studies of the CLIC BDS
- Javier Resta Lopez
- Takao Asaka
- Angeles Faus-Golfe
- Daniel Schulte
- Frank Zimmermann
2Contents
- Introduction
- CLIC BDS layout and optics
- Tracking codes
- Chromatic effects ( qualitative and quantitative
analysis) - Performance of the linear system
- Tracking studies for an alternative nonlinear
collimation system - Beam sizes at the spoiler
- Particles distribution at the spoiler
- Luminosity performance
- Outlook
3IntroductionCLIC BDS layout and optics
entrance
ß-CS
E-CS
FFS
IP
Dx (m)
ß1/2 (m1/2)
More details see talk from Frank Zimmermann
4IntroductionTracking codes
Entrance
IP
Importance of the benchmarking of codes
Guinea-Pig
Multiparticle tracking
Optics lattice
Beam-beam interaction
transport
performance
MAD Placet SAD
Lie
Other codes see talk from Stefano Redaelli
5Chromatic effects FFS
The center of the ellipse is determined by the
Taylor map
Transport formalism
For the FFS a description up to second order is
enough !
6Chromatic effects CS
1s
3s
The center of the ellipse
in this case R160. and R260.
7Chromatic effectsBDS
The center of the ellipse
The Taylor map up to 3rd order gives a good
description of the center ellipse transport in
phase space for d 0.3
8Chromatic effects
Beam profile at the IP
Residual horizontal dispersion at the IP
9Chromatic effects
Phase space at the IP
Particles with lower energy than the nominal one
(1500 GeV) contribute strongly to the tails of
the transversal phase space
10Chromatic effects
Polinomial fit to tracking data
x µm
1st, 2nd and 3rd order pure chromatic
coefficients
x µrad
1st, 2nd order matrix elements from direct
calculation with MAD
Third order chromatic aberrations can be built
from the aberrations at second order times
d??/?0 for instance, U1666 is related with
T116 D2, where D is dispersion
d0?E/E0
11Performance
Luminosity as a function of the beam energy
spread from the tracking with Placet, MAD and
SAD. The values have been normalized to the value
given by Placet at 0 energy spread without
synchrotron radiation.
12Tracking studies for an alternative nonlinear
collimation system
CLIC BDS with energy nonlinear collimation
section
1
Testing two different configurations for energy
nonlinear collimation
spoiler
2
Skew sextupole
Skew sextupole
See details from Angeles Faus talk
13Tracking studies Beam size at the spoiler
- The first skew sextupole is used to increase
the vertical beam size at the spoiler. This
allows us to collimate using a bigger collimator
half gap, so as to guarantee collimator survival
in case of beam impact.
1
Vertical beam size
Horizontal beam size
Average energy offset
2
14Tracking studies Particles distribution at the
spoiler
1
2
For an average energy offset d00.01
spoiler half gap
ax0.888 mm ay1.835 mm
ax2.21 mm ay8.349 mm
15Tracking studies Luminosity as function of the
skew sextupole strength
2
1
For Ks104 m-2 the luminosity decreases almost
two orders of magnitude with respect to the
value for Ks0.0
Better performance for different scenarios
16Tracking studies Particles distribution at the
spoiler
1
Horizontal plane
d01
in this case the sextupole reduces the
horizontal beam size at the spoiler for d0 2.5
. Not desired effect !
17Tracking studies Particles distribution at the
spoiler
2
Horizontal plane
d01
ax2.21 mm
smooth increase of the horizontal beam size
Collimation cut
18Tracking studies Particles distribution at the
spoiler
1
Vertical plane
d01
expected behavior !
ay1.835 mm
Collimation cut
19Tracking studies Particles distribution at the
spoiler
2
Vertical plane
d01
expected behavior !
ay8.349 mm
Collimation cut
20Tracking studies Outlook
2
1
- No bending magnet between the skew sextupoles
effective geometric aberrations cancellation - Better performance for different scenarios.
Improvement possibility. - Bad collimation efficiency !
- Bending magnets between the skew sextupoles
impair the geometric aberrations cancellation - Bad performance.
- Good collimation efficiency !
Next step find an optics solution between both
configurations !