Computational Analysis of Centrifugal Compressor Surge Control Using Air Injection PowerPoint PPT Presentation

presentation player overlay
1 / 24
About This Presentation
Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Computational Analysis of Centrifugal Compressor Surge Control Using Air Injection


1
Computational Analysis of Centrifugal Compressor
Surge Control Using Air Injection
Alexander Stein, Saeid Niazi and Lakshmi
Sankar School of Aerospace Engineering Georgia
Institute of Technology Supported by the U.S.
Army Research Office Under the Multidisciplinary
University Research Initiative (MURI) on
Intelligent Turbine Engines High Performance
Computer Time was Provided by the Major Shared
Resource Center of the U.S. Army Engineer
Research and Development Center (ERDC MSRC).

2
Outline of Presentation
  • Objectives and motivation
  • Background of compressor control
  • Introduction of numerical tools
  • Configuration and validation results
  • DLR high-speed centrifugal compressor (DLRCC)
  • Off-design results without control
  • Surge analysis
  • Off-design results with air injection control
  • Steady jets
  • Pulsed jets
  • Conclusions and recommendations

3
Motivation and Objectives
  • Use CFD to explore and understand compressor
    stall and surge
  • Develop and test control strategies (air
    injection) for centrifugal compressors
  • Apply CFD to compare low-speed and high-speed
    configurations

4
Motivation and Objectives
Compressor instabilities can cause fatigue and
damage to entire engine
5
What is Surge?
Mild Surge
Deep Surge
6
How to Alleviate Surge
  • Diffuser Bleed Valves
  • Pinsley, Greitzer, Epstein (MIT)
  • Prasad, Neumeier, Haddad (GT)
  • Movable Plenum Wall
  • Gysling, Greitzer, Epstein (MIT)
  • Guide Vanes
  • Dussourd (Ingersoll-Rand Research Inc.)
  • Air Injection
  • Murray (CalTech)
  • Weigl, Paduano, Bright (NASA Glenn)
  • Fleeter, Lawless (Purdue)

7
Numerical Formulation (Flow Solver)
Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes equations in
finite volume representation
  • q is the state vector.
  • E, F, and G are the inviscid fluxes (3rd order
    accurate). R, S, and T are the viscous fluxes
    (2nd order accurate).
  • A one-equation Spalart-Allmaras model is used.
  • Code can handle multiple computational blocks and
    rotor-stator-interaction.

8
Boundary Conditions (Flow Solver)
Periodic boundary at clearance gap
Solid wall boundary at impeller blades
Solid wall boundary at compressor casing
Inflow boundary
Periodic boundary at diffuser
Solid wall boundary at compressor hub
Outflow boundary (coupling with plenum)
Periodic boundary at compressor inlet
9
Outflow Boundary Condition (Flow Solver)
Conservation of mass and isentropic expression
for speed of sound
10
DLR High-Speed Centrifugal Compressor
  • Designed and tested by DLR
  • High pressure ratio
  • AGARD test case



11
DLR High-Speed Centrifugal Compressor
  • 24 Main blades
  • 30? Backsweep
  • Grid 141 x 49 x 33 (230,000 nodes)
  • A grid sensitivity study was done with up to 1.8
    Million nodes.
  • Design Conditions
  • 22,360 RPM
  • Mass flow 4.0 kg/s
  • Total pressure ratio 4.7
  • Adiab. efficiency 83
  • Exit tip speed 468 m/s
  • Inlet Mrel 0.92

12
Validation Results (Design Conditions) Static
Pressure Along Shroud
  • Excellent agreement between CFD and experiment
  • Results indicate grid insensitivity gt Baseline
    Grid is used subsequently

13
Off-Design Results Performance Characteristic Map
Computational and experimental data are within 5
Fluctuations at 3.2 kg/sec are 23 times larger
than at 4.6 kg/sec
14
Off-Design Results (High-Speed) Performance
Characteristic Map
Large limit cycle oscillations develop near surge
line
15
Off-Design Results (High-Speed) Mass Flow
Fluctuations
Mild surge cycles develop
Surge amplitude grows to 60 of mean flow rate
Surge frequency 90 Hz (1/100 of blade passing
frequency)
16
Air Injection Setup
Systematic study injection rate and yaw angle
were identified as the most sensitive
parameters. Related work Rolls Royce, Cal Tech,
NASA Glenn /MIT,
17
Air Injection Results (Steady Jets) Different
Yaw Angles, 3 Injected Mass Flow Rate
Optimum yaw angle of 7.5deg. yields best result
Mass Flow (kg/sec)
Rotor Revolutions, wt/2p
Reduction in Surge Amplitude ()
Positive yaw angle is measured in opposite
direction of impeller rotation
Yaw Angle (Degree)
18
Air Injection Results (Parametric Study)
  • An optimum yaw angle exists.
  • A reasonable amount (3) of injected air is
    sufficient to suppress surge.

19
Air Injection Results (Pulsed Jets)
  • Surge fluctuations decrease as long as the
    injection phase was lagged 180 deg. relative to
    the flow gt suggests feedback control
  • reduction in external air requirements by 50
    (compared to steady jets)

Nondim. Surge Fluctuations ()
Rotor Revolutions, wt/2p
20
Air Injection Results (Pulsed Jets)
  • 1.5 injected mass is sufficient to suppress
    surge
  • High-frequency jets (winj 4wsurge) perform
    better than low-frequency jets (winj wsurge)

Nondim. Surge Fluctuations ()
Rotor Revolutions, wt/2p
21
Air Injection Results (Pulsed Jets) Vorticity
Magnitudes Near Leading Edge Tip
  • Increased amounts of mixing enhance the momentum
    transfer from the injected fluid to the
    low-kinetic energy particles in the separation
    zone

22
Air Injection Results (Pulsed Jets) Shear
Stresses Near Leading Edge Tip
  • High-frequency actuation leads to significantly
    larger shear stress levels.
  • Produce smaller but intense turbulent eddies.
  • Enhances the mixing at small length scales.

Jet
23
Conclusions
  • A Viscous flow solver has been developed to
  • obtain a detailed understanding of instabilities
    in centrifugal compressors.
  • determine fluid dynamic factors that lead to
    stall onset.
  • Steady jets are effective means of controlling
    surge
  • Alter local incidence angles and suppress
    boundary layer separation.
  • Yawed jets are more effective than parallel jets.
  • An optimum yaw angle exists for each
    configuration.
  • Pulsed jets yield additional performance
    enhancements
  • Lead to a reduction in external air requirements.
  • Jets pulsed at higher frequencies perform better
    than low-frequency jets due to enhanced mixing at
    small length scales.

24
Recommendations
  • Perform studies that link air injection rates to
    surge amplitude via a feedback control law.
  • Use flow solver to analyze and optimize other
    control strategies, e.g. inlet guide vanes,
    synthetic jets, casing treatments.
  • Employ multi-passage flow simulations to study
    rotating stall and appropriate control
    strategies.
  • Study inflow distortion and its effects on stall
    inception.
  • Improve turbulence modeling of current generation
    turbomachinery solvers. Analyze the feasibility
    of LES methods.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com