Title: Flow electrification by cavity QED
1Flow electrification by cavity QED
- T. V. Prevenslik
- 11F, Greenburg Court
- Discovery Bay, Hong Kong
2Contents
- Historical background
- Contact electrification
- Purpose
- QED Theory
- Flow analysis
- Conclusions
?
3Historical background
- 1950 Streaming current ? Zeta potential
induced by impurity ions - 1980 Electrification ? density ionic charges
as double layer at the wall interface - 2001 Physiochemical corrosion-oxidation
- ... No evidence of corrosion products
- Streaming currents ? shear stress
- Source never identified
4Contact electrification
Contact and Balancing of Fermi levels
thermodynamic equilibrium Only one contact
necessary for equilibrium - independent of
materials. Experiment shows equilibrium is
reached in a single contact only for metals -
many contacts are necessary to achieve
equilibrium between metals and insulators. Some
mechanism - in addition to the balancing of Fermi
levels - is at play
5Cavity QED induced photoelectric effect
- Two-step model contact and separation
- Interface is a high frequency QED cavity that
inhibits low frequency IR radiation from thermal
kT energy inherent in atomic clusters. - IR energy released concentrates to VUV levels
in the surfaces of the metal and insulator - Electrons are produced by the photoelectric
effect.
6Purpose
- Extend the cavity QED induced photoelectric
effect in the Two-step model of contact
electrification to flow
electrification.
7Theoretical background
- Piping system and laminar flow
- QED cavities in hydraulic oils
- Comparison of contact and flow electrification
- Available EM energy
- Photoelectric effect
-
8Piping system
- Hydraulic fluid is pumped in laminar flow
through small diameter - long pipe - Loop is closed as the fluid falls into an open
receiving tank and pumped back to the supply
plenum. - Air enters the fluid in falling into
receiving tank - usually through the pump .
Air
Air
9Laminar flow relations
10Laminar flow and QED Cavities
- Light and electron emission occurs over
dimensions from walls less than 100 mm - Light emission precedes electron emission -
similar to photoelectric effect
11QED cavities in hydraulic oils
- Air clusters in flowing hydrocarbon liquids
- Tearing of oil during flow
- Tearing and QED electrification
- Source of EM energy
12 Air clusters in hydraulic oil
- Oil Vapor bubbles Px lt Pvap
- Air bubbles Px lt Pair
- Air bubbles likely as Pair gtgt Pvap
- Air enters the system through the open tank
- Solubility of air in hydraulic oils is
significant Ostwald
coefficient 10 ? by volume - Large air bubbles not likely by surface tension
- Air dissolved throughout oil as nano- clusters
of air ( N2 and O2 molecules )
13Tearing of oil during flow
- Maximum tension theory
Joseph, J Fluid Mech 366 (1998) 367 - Cavitation in laminar flow is explained as
viscous shear stress produces tensile stress at
45 to wall - Tearing of oil occurs if nominal tensile
stress is raised above the rupture stress of oil
because of the stress concentration of air
clusters - Tearing separates oil from itself or boundary
wall leaving an evacuated space with oil clusters
14Tearing and QED electrification
- Tearing produces vacuum spaces with oil
clusters - Spaces are a high frequency QED cavities that
briefly suppress low frequency IR radiation from
oil clusters. - Suppressed IR energy loss is conserved by a
gain to VUV levels in adjacent oil and wall
surfaces - Electrons are produced by the photoelectric
effect.
15 Source of EM energy
- Oil molecule has thermal kT energy
- Molecules are harmonic oscillators
- At ambient temperature, thermal kT energy is
equivalent to the molecule emitting IR radiation
16Oscillator and IR radiation
- At T 300 K, kT0.025 eV
- Saturation at l 100 mm
- Most of IR energy in oil molecule occurs
- l gt 20 mm
- If QED cavity confines IR radiation to l lt 20 mm,
most of thermal kT energy is suppressed
17Oil cluster formation
- Hydrostatic compression - IR uninhibited
- Hydrostatic tension - IR inhibited
- Surface tension S limits the radius R of the oil
cluster that can be formed, R gt R0 - Heptane R0 0.4 mm
18 IR energy in oil cluster
19VUV energy emitted by cluster
Cavity QED momentarily suppresses IR radiation
from cluster Conservation of energy requires the
prompt release of IR radiation Multi-IR photons
combine to VUV levels
Electrons and VIS photons produced
20Photoelectric effect
21Flow electrification
- Oil clusters and fragments in contact with
wall separate at entrance - IR radiation is suppressed and released as VUV
- Electrons are freed from oil
- Wall is charged negative and oil positive
22Summary
- Flow electrification occurs as oil ruptures in a
tearing action - Rupture takes place if the tensile stress at a
point exceeds the pressure at which the air
dissolved in oil, usually atmospheric pressure - Air clusters uniformly distributed throughout
the volume of the oil act as local stress
concentrators for rupture - Electron charge ? Number of oil clusters ? volume
- Electrical current is proportional to volume
flow rate Current Charge density x volume
flow rate - Current not proportional to surface area of the
wall
23Flow Analysis
Streaming current I ? Re x - flow
experiment I ? A( Px - Patm ) - electrical
analogy
NeQ replaces the flow Q Ne is the electron
density Since Ne ? NOC ? Px-1 Nc ? Px-1
24Volumetric current density
25Total current
26Conclusions
- Flow and contact electrification obey the same
physics - Inhibited IR to VUV by cavity QED - QED cavity is an evacuated space containing oil
clusters that briefly forms as the oil ruptures
and tears under tensile stress - Tearing is governed by the tensile stress given
by the maximum tension theory - Cavity QED converts thermal kT energy to VUV
- The analytical I and I / Q relations derived are
reasonable approximations of flow electrification
data for a volume charge relation. An area charge
relation does not correlate with the data