Practical NRM - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 30
About This Presentation
Title:

Practical NRM

Description:

Section of Environmental Studies and Policy, Utrecht University. Contents ... Main actors involved in a ... tradition of Polder model' Why identifying ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:99
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 31
Provided by: geogra2
Category:
Tags: nrm | polder | practical

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Practical NRM


1
Practical NRM
  • Lecture
  • Stakeholders in the Dommel area
  • Hens Runhaar
  • Section of Environmental Studies and Policy,
    Utrecht University

2
Contents
  • What are stakeholders?
  • Why identifying stakeholders?
  • Some stakeholders in the Dommel area and their
    respective roles
  • State
  • Market
  • Civil society
  • Some critical elements of stakeholder analysis
  • Further reading

3
What are stakeholders?
4
What are stakeholders?
  • Main actors involved in a particular policy
    problem
  • People who have an interest (stake) in solving or
    maintaining the problem
  • Any group or individual who can affect or is
    affected by the achievement of the firms
    objectives (Rowley, 1997)
  • Actors who are both affected by and affecting
    the problem and are, at the same time,
    participating in the process of formulating and
    solving it (Banville et al., 1998)
  • ? Actors become stakeholders when they contribute
    to a policy problem, are needed for solving the
    problem, or are affected by the problem or
    problem-solving activities

5
What are stakeholders (2)
  • Example sixth runway Schiphol airport
  • Who are stakeholders? And why (what is their
    stake)?
  • Demarcation
  • Types of stakes
  • Research goal

6
Why identifying stakeholders?
  • Public policy political agreement on a course
    of action (or inaction) designed to resolve or
    mitigate problems in the political agenda
    (Fischer, 1997)
  • Policy-making increasingly a multi-actor
    activity
  • Various tiers of government involved, with own
    autonomy
  • Resources (knowledge, support, finance, etc.)
    spread among many actors
  • Democracy concerns
  • Dutch tradition of Polder model

7
Why identifying stakeholders?
  • Public policy thus through governance rather
    than government
  • Non-hierarchical forms of steering
  • Examples agreements, covenants,
    partnerships etc.
  • Multi-level governance
  • Multi-actor governance
  • Multi-sector governance
  • Stakeholders play a role in policy-making

8
Why identifying stakeholders?
  • Explanation
  • Choice of instruments
  • Dynamics in policy processes (e.g. shifting
    goals)
  • Success or failure of the policy
  • Evaluation
  • Ex ante effectiveness of the policy programme
  • Prescription
  • Better or more legitimate problem definition
  • Prioritisation of policy options
  • Smoother implementation

9
Some stakeholders in the Dommel area and their
respective roles
  • State (public or general interest)
  • Market (private interests)
  • Civil society (specific public or private
    interests)

10
Some stakeholders in the Dommel area and their
respective roles
  • State
  • All organisations and activities that aim to
    solve social problems and steer society
  • Synonyms are public administration and government
  • Characteristics (but not always)
  • Public law
  • Taxes main source of income

11
State
  • Why does it exist?
  • Protect the market prevent monopolies and
    cartels
  • Complement the market collective goods (e.g.
    dykes)
  • Protect against the market regulate
    external effects
  • Correct the market merit goods
    (e.g. tobacco)
  • Compensate for the market income
    redistribution

12
State
  • How is it organised?
  • Three layers of administration (Huis van
    Thorbecke)
  • Two types of administration
  • Territorial administration
  • Functional administration
  • Overlapping jurisdictions
  • Policy-making as a multi-stakeholder activity
    (multi-level governance)

13
State
  • Territorial administration
  • Central government (13 depts.)
  • Provinces (12)
  • Municipalities ( 489)

14
State
  • Functional administration
  • Tasks laid down in laws
  • Territories of different magnitude (derived from
    task)
  • Examples
  • Water Boards (27)
  • Police

15
State
  • Cooperation between authorities
  • Economies of scale
  • Specific knowledge at lower levels
  • Joint action required (e.g. congestion)
  • Coordination between authorities
  • Autonomy
  • Joint-administration
  • Supervision
  • Cooperation/coordination within authorities

16
State
  • Example spatial planning
  • Ministry of Spatial Planning, Housing and
    Environment (VROM)National policy document on
    spatial planning (Nota Ruimte)
  • Province regional spatial plan (Streekplan)
  • Municipalitylocal land use plan
    (Bestemmingsplan)

17
State
  • Problems of multi-level governance BLOW
  • Backgrounds
  • Depts. of Defence, Agriculture, Transport
    provinces VNG
  • Goal create space for wind turbines in spatial
    plans realise turbines
  • Covenant instead of top-down regulation
  • Implementation problematic
  • Not all covenanting partners cooperated
    (departments, municipalities)
  • Partly due to specialisation, allocation of costs
    and benefits, voluntary character
  • Partly due to governance strategies that ignored
    creation of support or that focused too much on
    creation of support

18
Provinces
  • Tasks
  • Transport, water, environment, spatial planning,
    welfare, culture
  • Examples
  • Regional spatial plan
    (streekplan)
  • Environmental policy plan
    (milieubeleidsplan)
  • Water management plan
    (waterhuishoudingsplan)
  • Competences
  • Supervision orchestrate
  • Cooperation between municipalities,
    reorganisations
  • Tax (opcenten MRB)
  • Can install or uninstall Water Boards

19
Water Boards
  • Oldest element of our public administration
  • Tasks
  • Weirs, dams (dry feet)
  • Water quality (clean water)
  • Water quantity (dry feet)
  • Of old interest payment right of say
  • Elections since 1997

20
Water Boards
  • Competences
  • Quality demands water
  • Permits
  • Authority in the case of emergency
  • Taxes
  • Scaling-up
  • 1950 2,500 Water Boards
  • 1997 66
  • 2004 35
  • 2005 27

21
Water Boards
  • Relations with other administrative bodies
  • Province supervises
  • Coordination re. spatial planning and
    environmental policy with municipalities and
    departments
  • European Directives

22
(No Transcript)
23
Market
  • Producers and consumers
  • Market actors in the Dommel area
  • Energy companies
  • Farmers
  • Consumers (energy, car users, )
  • Interest groups (ZLTO, consumer groups, )
  • ()

24
Market
  • Governing the market - the Dutch countryside as
    an example
  • Ecological, ethical and health risks
    reconstruction needed
  • Governance other interests and stakeholders
    apart from ec-agr.
  • Zoning of agriculture and pig-free areas
  • Extensification budget insufficient to cover all
    costs thus only voluntary removals and no limit
    on expansion
  • Pig-free areas only effective if all companies
    are regional European Commission allowed pig
    vaccination against swine fever
  • Lessons
  • No effective governance with hierarchical project
    architecture
  • Consequences were not explored sufficiently

25
Civil society
  • Groups of people who organise themselves around
    specific public or private interests (NGOs)
  • NGOs in the Dommel area
  • ANWB
  • Greenpeace
  • Stichting Natuur en Milieu
  • ()

26
Some critical elements of stakeholder analysis
  • Why do you need them?
  • Required for formal decision-making
  • Required for specific resources (land, money,
    knowledge, support, )
  • Required for implementation
  • ()
  • How will you identify them?
  • How will you involve them?

27
Some critical elements of stakeholder analysis
  • Which actors are involved (have a stake) in the
    problem area?
  • How are they involved, what are their interests
    regarding the problem, and how do they perceive
    the problem?
  • How relevant are these actors (in terms of
    critical resources)?
  • What policy alternative is supported by most
    stakeholders?
  • What effects do (did) the stakeholders expect
    from the policy?
  • How are the stakeholders related?
  • Which (coalitions of) actors may support or block
    problem-solving activities?

28
Data sources
  • Analysis of documents
  • Interviews
  • Deduction
  • Observation

29
Further reading
  • Grimble, R. (1998), Stakeholder methodologies in
    natural resource management. Socio-economic
    methodologies, best practices guidelines, Chatham
    (UK) Natural Resources Institute, The University
    of Greenwich (http//www.nri.org/publications/bpg/
    bpg02.pdf)
  • Driessen, P.P.J. (2005), Restructuring the Dutch
    countryside limits of a governance strategy,
    Planning, practice research, 20 (1), pp. 69-77

30
More info
  • About the Dutch government
  • www.overheid.nl/guest/ (in English)
  • www.waterschappen.nl (in Dutch and in English)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com