Technology Foresight New Opportunities for Bulgaria International Conference

presentation player overlay
1 / 58
About This Presentation
Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Technology Foresight New Opportunities for Bulgaria International Conference


1
Technology Foresight - New Opportunities for
BulgariaInternational Conference
  • Sofia, Bulgaria
  • May 27, 2004

2
RESULTS ACHIEVED SO FAR IN THE IMPLEMENTATION
OF THE PILOT FORESIGHT EXERCISE IN ROMANIA
Mr. Cristian MarandeiCRIMM Foundationwww.imm.ro

Mr. Radu Albulescu National Experts Panel
ROMANIA
3
Importance of biotechnology and of biotechnology
research on food chain in Romania
  • Romanian agriculture and food industry have a
    remarkable potential.
  • The agricultural surface represents
  • 62.2 of the national territory
  • 25.2 of the agricultural surface of the Central
    and East European countries
  • 10.25 from the agricultural surface of the EU
    countries.
  • The arable surface represents
  • 63.2 of Romanias agricultural surface
  • 23.0 of the arable surface of the Central and
    East European countries
  • 12.6 from the arable surface of the EU
    countries.

4
  • The biodiversity both spontaneous and a reach
    variety of species and hybrids adapted to our
    conditions
  • A high potential concerning the specialists with
    superior or medium schooling in biotechnology
  • A high tradition as regards the research in the
    field of agriculture and food - the percentage in
    culture of creations of the Romanian agricultural
    research as regards the main field cultures and
    horticulture has never sunk under 60.
  • The internal market for agrifood products is
    rather well developed and with good perspectives
    of further development

5
Importance of biotechnology and of biotechnology
research on food chain in Romania
  • Over 60 of the activities within the field of
    agriculture and of food industry are represented
    by biotechnologies.
  • Biotechnology can intervene for the development
    of agriculture and of food industry according to
    the requirements of the protection and
    improvement of the environment quality and can
    solve environmental and food safety problems
    which were created because of
  • large forest and lawn surfaces which were
    transformed into agricultural fields - new types
    of eco-systems more unstable and much more
    vulnerable than the natural eco-systems
  • the intensive conventional agriculture, the
    industrial development, the urbanization, the
    intensification of the transports.

6
  • The scientific activity concerning the
    biotechnology field on food chain is carried out,
    within a complex system through the involvement
    by components and relations between these (rural
    environment, ecological conditions)
  • natural resources plants animals primary
    production processing market consumer

7
  • Joining to EU
  • Quality regulations
  • Standardization
  • Legislative harmonization.
  • In the context of European integration and
    globalization, the Romanian agriculture and food
    industry shall face major challenges concerning
    the development of a sustainable and
    high-performance agriculture from the economic
    and qualitative point of view, the accomplishment
    of food quality and safety and the environment
    protection. The increase of biotechnology
    research contribution to the development of
    agriculture and food industry makes necessary the
    improvement of the conditions for high-quality
    research.

8
Description of the work plan
  • Participants
  • Institute of Food Bioresources
  • Chemical Pharmaceutical Research Institute
  • SC Bioing SA
  • Initially, 3 panels of experts have been
    established in order to cover the sub-fields
  • Agriculture, forestry, food industry and textile
    industry
  • Medicine and pharmacy, energetic and extractive
    industry
  • Environment, genetics, biology and chemical
    industry.

9
  • January 26th - The first Capacity Building
    Workshop
  • - the experts developed STEEPV and SWOT exercises
    on those 3 subfields.
  • January 27th - a single panel experts was
    established from the three previously available.
    The panel of experts consists of 18 persons
  • Institute of Food Bioresources - 7 persons
  • Chemical-Pharmaceutics Institute - 6 persons
  • SC Bioing - 5 persons.
  • The program of panel of experts consisted in a
    weekly meeting at CRIMM headquarter and sub-group
    meetings whenever necessary at the headquarters
    of the three institutes.
  • In this respect there were established 3
    subgroups, one in each institute and 2 days,
    Friday and Monday for subgroup meetings. It was
    also built a common e-mail address for panel of
    experts f_group_at_ncpri.ro but there were used
    also phones and faxes for communication.
  • All documents elaborated within subgroup
    meetings were disseminated to the others by
    e-mail.

10
  • February 4th - the subject selected for the
    foresight exercise was Biotechnology research on
    food chain.
  • The following arguments supported the selection
    of this subject
  • The high potential of Romania in agriculture and
    food industry
  • The task and the aim of the research as promoter
    of healthy and safety agrifood products
  • The larger involvement of the Romanian research
    within the European Research Space
  • The main objective of our national economy
    consisting in the provision of the food security
    and safety.

11
  • The next two meetings have been scheduled having
    regard to the application of STEEPV method on the
    selected subject.
  • The panel of experts has created a network with
    over 100 participants (research units,
    manufacturers and processors, associations) that
    can participate with ideas and different
    contributions to the prevision exercises.
  • February 11th the group of experts met for
    STEEPV exercise. The priorities found in subgroup
    meetings were processed, discussed and an
    agreement has been reached as regards their
    preservation in the exercise.
  • The results of STEEPV exercise materialized in
    20 social, 15 technological, 11 economic, 8
    environmental, 17 policy and 6 ethics priorities.

12
  • February 18th - establishing the importance and
    the incertitude of the priorities obtained by way
    of STEEPV exercise
  • February 25th - SWOT analysis. The result of this
    meeting consisted in 11 strong points, 25 weak
    points, 27 opportunities and 5 threats in the
    field Biotechnology research on the food chain
  • March 10th - SWOT matrix was revised and
    finalized by adding the inputs received from the
    network and from the subgroups from the three
    institutes.

13
  • March 24th - discussion about The panel
    activity draft prepared by the chairperson and
    secretary of the panel with the help of CRIMM
  • All participants received the paper before
    meeting by e-mail
  • There were several improvements of the paper from
    the panel.
  • Conclusion of the working groups
  • There were 6 meetings of the entire panel and 12
    subgroup meetings.
  • The participation of the experts was very dynamic
    and active in all the meetings.
  • In all the meetings participated almost all the
    experts and the communication was very good.

14
STEEPV
SOCIAL (I)
Consumers improving conditions life - Food
and social security - Protection and consumer
health - Improving of health and health system
and life expectancy increasing - Safety
environmental conditions job - Morbidity and
demography - Consumer information - Income
and consumer requests increasing - Jobs for
everyone (women, men, young, elderly, persons
with deficiencies so on), unemployment
decreasing - Economic development of poor
districts.
15
SOCIAL (II)
  • Research system and researchers
  • Scientific performance
  • Education and training of specialists
  • Researchers motivation
  • Stimulation of young and senior researchers
  • Educational system for qualified human resources
  • Supported mobility and free mobility of human
    resources
  • Research results dissemination
  • Decrease researchers migration.

16
TECHNOLOGICAL
  • Laboratory methods and technologies
  • GMO control system
  • Biotechnological laboratory methods
  • Traceability
  • Traditional technologies promotion
  • Biodegradable packages
  • Wastes and subproducts recovery
  • Biological vegetal protection
  • New energy sources
  • Synbiotic products
  • New technologies, products, services.
  • Infrastructure and quality systems
  • Quality systems
  • Technological transfer
  • Integrate management into ecological system
  • Know-how resources
  • Research infrastructure.

17
ECONOMIC
  • The amount of financial resources
  • Research results using, economic indicators
    improving
  • Assurance of investment for infrastructure
    development
  • Products and services marketing
  • The existing of regenerable raw material
  • Added value increasing
  • Ecological products promotion
  • Synergetic economical effect
  • Economical reconversion of low developed
    districts
  • Stimulation of local area development
  • SMEs development.

18
ENVIRONMENTAL
  • Bioremediation
  • Removing of environment polluting technologies
  • Cleaning of wasting waters
  • Management and ecosystems protection
  • "Clean" technologies
  • Wastes management
  • Sustainable development
  • Risks management.

19
POLITICAL
  • Research system
  • The adequate amount of research financing
  • Investments stimulation
  • Research development
  • Research infrastructure development
  • National Research Programs for research funding
  • Network researchers stimulation
  • Investment for setting up of pilot plants
  • Awareness of government personalities
  • Capital for risks
  • Birocracies decreasing
  • Biotechnological products certifying
  • EU integration and globalization
  • European standards and legislation adopting and
    harmonizing
  • International collaboration
  • EU integration and globalization.

20
VALUE-BASED AND ETHICS RELATED ISSUES
  • Intellectual property
  • Research and researchers ethics
  • Biological security
  • GMOs releasing control
  • Products labeling
  • Media research results dissemination.

21
STEEPV
22
SWOT
  • STRENGHTS
  • Availability of regenerating primary resources -
    potential for the provision of food security
  • New technologies, products and services
  • Availability of traditional competitive
    technologies and products
  • Vegetal biological protection
  • National programs
  • Inter-disciplinary consortiums
  • Legislation adaptation and harmonizing
  • Availability of the educational system and the
    qualified labor force
  • Know-how resources
  • Value-added increase by way of biotechnology
  • Economic development of disadvantaged areas
  • Ethics of research and researcher.

23
WEAKNESSES
  • Regulation of intellectual property rights
  • Research infrastructure
  • Risk management
  • Risk capital
  • Labor environment safety
  • Involvement of the decision factors
  • Technological transfer
  • Research share in the product price
  • Level of investment
  • Research motivation
  • Research pilot stations
  • Ratification of biotechnological products
  • Bureaucracy
  • Product and service marketing
  • Consumer information
  • Dissemination of research results
  • GMOs control system

24
OPPORTUNITIES
  • Sustainable development Bioremedy, Residual
    water purification, Management integrated in the
    ecological system, Clean technologies, Waste
    management, Biodegradable packages,
    Biotechnological analysis methods, Vegetal
    biological protection, Ecological products
    market
  • Food safety and Life quality
  • EU integration, European financing programs,
    International collaboration
  • Quality systems
  • Specialists education and forming, Stimulation
    of young researchers, Mobility of researchers
  • Traceability of products
  • Non-conventional energy technologies
  • Promotion of sinbiotics
  • Synergic economic effect, Social inclusion
  • SME development
  • Mass-media involvement

25
THREATS
  • Financing level
  • Research infrastructure
  • Management and protection of ecosystems
  • Non-loyal competition
  • Globalization
  • Migration of researchers

26
(No Transcript)
27
(No Transcript)
28
SWOT RESULTS
  • All the emphasized topics are of medium, great,
    and major importance
  • The incertitude has small and medium level, the
    only exception being the migration of
    researchers that has been identified at the
    chapter threats from the SWOT analysis
  • The next incertitude value is that of
    globalization that has been also identified by
    the group of experts as a threat of this field,
    because it concentrates more efforts in the
    research field in order to face this phenomenon
  • As regards the importance the sustainable
    development detaches itself it includes all the
    aspects where the biotechnology can play a major
    role
  • Also very important are the regulations on
    intellectual property rights, ethics of research
    and of researcher and certainly the level of
    financing and research.

29
April 5th - 6th - was organized The Second
Capacity Building Workshop which had the subject
Scenarios development techniques. During the
workshop the panel of experts were initiated with
the method of scenarios, while the future group
activities will have in view the elaboration of 3
scenarios in the field of biotechnology on food
chain. April 19th and 22nd - the panel of
experts had meetings for 3 scenarios developing
Hard Time, Visionary and BAU (Basic As
Usually). April 28th 29th - Dr. David Cohen
was invited as international expert on
Biotechnology to have remarks about the panel of
experts works till this date.
30
Drivers
  • Consumer protection (human health promotion
    demographic change)
  • Well have a certain level of dev. in the food
    production, the financial developments in the
    field of food production, supporting policies for
    the professional development of research
  • There will be some risk in implementing the
    acquis, risks of climatic changes,
  • Romania will be a leader in the production of
    safe food

31
Drivers
  • Innovative and new technologies needed to perform
    research
  • Genetically markers, introduction of technologies
    less time and resource consuming, automation of
    research, cheaper and faster research, use of
    predictive models
  • All the above are hardly affordable, people do
    not have enough capacity to use all the above
    technologies.

32
Drivers
  • Impact of new technologies on agricultural
    practice/food chain
  • Genetic risks, lack of financial means
  • Innovative genetic technologies adapted to the
    climatic conditions
  • Development of biotech for bio-remediation of
    soils, Technologies for protection of natural
    resources, for management of water and soil
    resources, Production of both natural seeds and
    GMOs
  • Agricultural production of raw materials for the
    industry, energy resources
  • Increase of income of population, increase of
    consumption requirements, development of
    underdeveloped regions
  • Risk of GMOs presence in the food chain
  • Increase in life standard of Romanian population
    in line with EU standard.

33
Drivers
  • Globalization of markets Ambition of Romania to
    offer certified products on EU and world market
  • Production of food for EU by using Romanian
    traditional technologies, qualitative Romanian
    products for the EU markets
  • High competition will lead to a decrease in the
    food production in Romania
  • Brand names of Romanian products recognized on
    the EU markets.

34
Drivers
  • Quality management provision of cost-effective
    food production in Romania
  • QMS are fully implemented, Romania will be
    competitive on EU market and domestic market
  • QMS fully implemented, but products are
    competitive only on EU market, prices too high
    for the domestic market
  • QMS will be implemented only on theory but will
    not be functioning in practice, products will
    have bad quality, no competitiveness on EU or
    domestic market.

35
Drivers
  • Brain drain and threat to renewal of human
    resources
  • Romania will have healthy economy with high
    research budget, researchers will be well
    motivated, young people will be better motivated
    to work in research
  • The economy will continue to have deficiency, so
    research migration will continue
  • good management at institutional level concerning
    the stimulation of researchers who are getting
    funds from national and international programs,
    helping young people to apply for fellowships and
    enhancing HR mobility, ensured in employment
    contracts .

36
Drivers
  • Political will to put national priority on
    research in food chain due to current potential
  • Government will consider agrifood as priority,
    theyll ensure the appropriate research budget
  • Government will enhance technology transfer and
    SMEs participation, with high quota co-financing
    coming from SMEs
  • Government support for research agrifood is
    insufficient to renew infrastructure, increase of
    brain drain

37
Drivers
  • Food safety
  • HACCP systems fully implemented in all companies
    from production and processing, the consequences
    are the increase of market for food products,
    increase of well-being of people, demographical
    increase, increase of life expectancy
  • HACCP systems are not implemented, and food
    products do not meet consumer confidence, food
    products are excluded from the EU and domestic
    markets
  • Implementation of HACCP would lead to an
    extremely rigid food production process,
    bureaucracy, formalizing everything will hinder
    innovation, regulation on food becomes so heavy
    that it is comparable to the one regarding
    pharmaceuticals
  • After 10 years of experience of HACCP operation,
    HACCP will allow for increase of flexibility on
    EU level

38
Drivers
  • Sustainable development agenda biosafety
    Organic farming in Romania
  • There is a clear national policy on encouraging
    sustainable agriculture and organic farming, the
    products are affordable on EU and domestic
    markets
  • No national clear national policy encouraging
    sustainable agriculture through subsidies, the
    bio-products are too expensive for the Romanian
    market
  • Maintain acceptable level between economic and
    social activities in favor of preserving
    eco-balance

39
Drivers
  • CAP reform Acquis WTO negotiations
  • Better organized economic development, better
    structured economic environment,, development of
    infrastructure and institutions,
  • Decreasing export and decreased food production
    in general
  • Elimination or limitation of some types of
    cultures (crops) that do not fit with EU policies

40
Drivers
  • The need to link research to development
    Research financing EC Framework Program
    (innovation included)
  • Economic development following industrial
    application of new technologies
  • Increase of the researchers life standard and
    increase of the researchers competitiveness on
    EU level
  • Some national priorities will be overlooked in
    the view of application of only EU priorities

41
Drivers
  • Skills and finance to translate research into
    products IP regulation Marketing (applied
    research, technology transfer)
  • Increasing licensed products and ensure of
    financial security
  • Increasing the costs for patent may result in
    short-term difficulties for people to apply for
    patent, long-term benefits provided by the
    internationalization of the domestic patent
    system,
  • Policy incentives to encourage patenting

42
Drivers
  • Traceability regulation and enforcement quality
    control consumer confidence
  • Increase of export, increase of consumer
    confidence in products
  • Increasing the production costs following the
    implementation of strict quality control

43
Drivers
  • Structure and reform of the agro-sector labor
    issues
  • Increase of the number of farmers associations,
    and of the production quality and its promotion
    on the market
  • Decreasing the number of jobs in agriculture
  • Limitation of the development in some production
    fields as result of EU policy application

44
Drivers
45
Drivers
46
The first 8 important drivers from the matrix
  • Food safety
  • Political will to put national priority on
    research in food chain due to current potential
  • Consumer protection (human health promotion
    demographic change)
  • The need to link research to development
    Research financing EC Framework Program
    (innovation included)

47
The first 8 important drivers from the matrix
  • Sustainable development agenda biosafety
    Organic farming in Romania
  • Innovative and new technologies needed to perform
    research (biotech, ICT, etc.)
  • Impact of new technologies on agricultural
    practice/food chain
  • Quality management provision of cost-effective
    food production in Romania

48
Casual links between drivers
49
Scenarios
  • Hard Time Scenario
  • Basic As Usual Scenario
  • Success Scenario

50
RECOMMENDATIONS
  • Over 35 from active population are employed in
    agriculture but their work represents only 15
    from Gross Internal Income. It means that is
    necessary a development of this sector concerning
    its efficiency. The increasing of the
    productivity and the quality of agro-products has
    also a positive meaning in food industry.
    Research activities improving is the best way
    for the over said.

51
RECOMMENDATIONS
  • The core of biotechnology on food chain research
    needs is the importance that is given to the
    agrifood sector at the national level. Awareness
    is required at political level about the great
    potential of Romania in agriculture and food
    industry and the fact that research in this
    sector has to have the support according with
    this potential.

52
RECOMMENDATIONS
  • The aim of agrifood research is to improve food
    quality, to ensure food security and to have
    competitive products and efficient activities.
  • The research has to maintain and to increase its
    leading role in quality and food safety. The
    research has to identify the policies that ensure
    food safety and security.

53
RECOMMENDATIONS
  • The traceability of agrifood products is very
    important. Innovative and new technologies to
    perform research are required. Genetically
    markers and developing other new technologies to
    ensure traceability is an actual concern in
    research and agrifood industry.

54
RECOMMENDATIONS
  • Globalization, European integration of Romania
    will influence consumer requests concerning
    quality and food safety, food security and
    nutrition, legislation and control. Impact of
    new biotechnologies on agricultural practice/food
    chain, new knowledge in this field will satisfy
    these requests.

55
RECOMMENDATIONS
  • Sustainable development, biosafety and organic
    farming in Romania are ones of the most
    important priorities for research on
    biotechnology on food chain.
  • Consumer requests put, in the first, health
    status of humans, its maintenance and prevention
    against illness

56
RECOMMENDATIONS
  • Consumer protection through human health
    promotion represents another important driver
    which will influence researches on biotechnology
    on food chain.
  • It is necessary that food to be more complex and
    connected with all aspects which influence human
    body during the life cycle.

57
RECOMMENDATIONS
  • In agrifood industry there are 3 steps which lead
    to a high quality
  • the quality of agrifood and quality of producers
  • national procedures for quality assuring
  • quality of legislation.

58
RECOMMENDATIONS
  • Environment protection becomes more and more
    important. The number of people is higher and
    higher that means a higher quantity of agrifood
    products and a higher quantity of residues. These
    will influence policies and the ways of
    processing and eating habits.
  • Agrifood production has to develop in accordance
    with consumer request and sustainability
    principles, in ecological and ethical values
    conditions.

59
RECOMMENDATIONS
  • Collaboration and linking with European Research
    within ERA is very important for Romania, to
    increase the researchers life standard and to
    promote on the European market, Romanian
    products.

60
CONCLUSIONS
  • The agriculture and food industry has a great
    potential in Romania and biotechnological
    research on food chain is entirely influenced by
    this potential
  • The agrifood policies (implementing of quality
    management systems, control systems, research
    programs, etc.) influence the all the
    activities on food chain inclusive research

61
CONCLUSIONS
  • The most important priorities in biotechnological
    research on food chain are food safety and
    consumer protection
  • Research in biotechnology has to take into
    account the sustainability development (inclusive
    biosafety) and the great potential of Romania in
    organic farmer

62
CONCLUSIONS
  • Supporting research at national level and
    European level (financial, training of
    researchers, etc.) will influence the developing
    of research on biotechnology
  • Contribution of Romanian Researchers to ERA
    (mobility of researchers, setting up or entering
    in the research project consortia, etc.)
    influences developing of research in
    biotechnology by improving life standard of the
    researchers and promoting of the Romanian
    research activities at international level.

63
Thank you!
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com