Robustness and Reliability: uncertainties at calamities - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 23
About This Presentation
Title:

Robustness and Reliability: uncertainties at calamities

Description:

The robust use of Dynamic Traffic Management ... Probit model. Several estimations (error! ... Path updates: probit model. Destination update: logit-like model ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:103
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 24
Provided by: victor103
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Robustness and Reliability: uncertainties at calamities


1
Robustness and Reliability (un)certainties at
calamities
  • The robust use of Dynamic Traffic Management at
    calamities

Travel Time Reliability
Victor Knoop
Transport Planning
2
Overview
  • Recent research projects
  • Spillback, blocking and capacity conclusions
  • Future work

3
Recent research
  • Simulation of evacuation of Rotterdam area
  • Urban roads and motorways
  • What is influence of spillback in combination
    with Dynamic Traffic Management
  • Many models without spillback
  • What is influence of capacity reductionin
    combination with Dynamic Traffic Management
  • In evacuation capacity drop

4
Capacity reduction
  • Direct, delayed flooding makes tunnel unusable

5
Capacity reduction
  • Calamities causes different behaviour

6
Characteristics of the simulation
  • 240.000 cars, 44 origins, 6 exit points
  • DSMART, model developed at TU Delft
  • Macroscopic
  • Spillback-effects
  • Possible DTM-influence
  • Destination update
  • Path update

7
DSMART
  • Marcroscopic
  • Aggregated variables flow, density, avg. speed
  • Base element cell, homogeneous
  • Demand Supply

8
Screenshots DSMART
  • Spillback

9
No spillback the process
  • Queue on link will not affect outflow of upstream
    link
  • gt Supply independent of density downstream link
  • gt Change supply function for last cell of link
  • Demand Supply

10
No spillback the visualization
  • Enormous densities

11
Route and destination choice
  • At start destination and path based on free flow
  • Based on free flow times to all exit points
  • Destination choice
  • logit-like distribution
  • the longer the travel time, the less people will
    go there exp(-mT)
  • Path
  • Probit model
  • Several estimations (error!) of travel time,
    choose shortest in time small preference for main
    roads

12
Rerouting and Redestination
  • Every 15 minutes
  • Path update
  • Path update and destination update
  • Not only destination update (based on what?)
  • Path updates probit model
  • Destination update logit-like model
  • Both only part of travelers change route /
    destination

13
Spillback effects
  • No effect DTM measures in a model without
    spillback effects

14
Spillback DTM effects
15
Conclusion
  • Dynamic Traffic Management Measures can sort out
    effect, but spillback must be simulated

16
Road blocking
  • Direct attack on road, earthquake

17
Road blocking
  • Block one link
  • Investigate performance of network with blocked
    link
  • Two scenarios
  • Rerouting
  • No rerouting
  • Normal weekday OD

18
Results
With rerouting gt
lt Without rerouting
19
Reliability capacity reduction
20
Conclusion
  • No analysis of derivatives, simulations
  • Delay in the same order of magnitude as capacity
    reduction
  • Speed reduction proportional with capacity
    reduction?
  • Factor 1??

21
Future research
  • DTM at calamities
  • Flooding, snow, earthquake, nuclear disaster
  • Peoples reaction at a calamity
  • Special DTM measures
  • Which measures
  • What are peoples responses to this measures
  • Which reliability at calamities (no electricity,
    no gsm)
  • Could one account for bad prediction in applying
    tactic
  • Which performance indicator
  • New (microscopic) simulator basis?

22
No spillback
Back
23
DSMART
  • Marcroscopic
  • Base element cell, homogeneous
  • Demand Supply
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com