Title: Interpersonal Attraction
1Interpersonal Attraction
2Real Real Gone
I got hit by a bow and arrow Got me down to the
very marrow And Im real real gone Some people
say You can make it on your own Oh you can make
it if you try I know better now You cant stand
up alone --Van Morrison
3Factors Influencing Interpersonal Attraction
- Attraction in the short term
- Propinquity
- Physical attractiveness IQ personality
- Attitude similarity
- Long-term relationships
- Couples research (Rubin)
- Family systems
- The effects of co-habitation
- Neurotransmitters endorphins, oxytocin
4Factors Influencing Interpersonal Attraction
- Attraction in the short term
- Propinquity
- Physical attractiveness IQ personality
- Attitude similarity
- Long-term relationships
- Couples research (Rubin)
- Family systems
- The effects of co-habitation
- Neurotransmitters endorphins, oxytocin
5Factors Influencing Interpersonal Attraction
- Attraction in the short term
- Propinquity
- Physical attractiveness IQ personality
- Attitude similarity
- Long-term relationships
- Couples research (Rubin)
- Family systems
- The effects of co-habitation
- Neurotransmitters endorphins, oxytocin
6Propinquity
- The Westgate Housing Project (Festinger, Schacter
Back ) - Expectation of close interaction (Darley
Berschied)
7Westgate Housing Project
Street
8Westgate Housing Project
Street
9Westgate Housing Project
Street
10Westgate Housing Project
Less than 1/2 as many friends
Street
11Propinquity
- The Westgate Housing Project (Festinger, Schacter
Back ) - Expectation of close interaction (Darley
Berschied) - Subjects given two folders with ambiguous
personality information (A and B) - Told they would meet one woman, not the other
- Woman that they expected to meet higher
anticipated liking
12Factors Influencing Interpersonal Attraction
- Attraction in the short term
- Propinquity
- Physical attractiveness IQ personality
- Attitude similarity
- Long-term relationships
- Couples research (Rubin)
- Family systems
- The effects of co-habitation
- Neurotransmitters endorphins, oxytocin
13Walster et al. Computer Dating Study
- Freshman Welcome Week dance
- I.V.s
- Attractiveness rated
- Personality tests (social skills
introversion-extroversion masculinity-femininity
MMPI - IQ
- Subjects matched for date (randomly)
- D.V.s
- Rated date at intermission
- Contacted several months later about further dates
14Computer Dating Study
- Physical attractiveness the most important factor
- Intelligence and personality were not related to
future dating
15Stereotypes of Physical Attractiveness
- Stereotypes of young children (Dion Bersheid)
- Self-fulfilling nature of attractiveness
stereotypes (Snyder et al.)
16Stereotypes of Physical Attractiveness
- Stereotypes of young children (Dion Bersheid)
- Self-fulfilling nature of attractiveness
stereotypes (Snyder et al.)
17Stereotypes of Physical Attractiveness
- Stereotypes of young children (Dion Bersheid)
- Self-fulfilling nature of attractiveness
stereotypes (Snyder et al.)
18Snyder et al.
- Males (subjects) thought experiment was about
communication--had picture taken - Told would have conversation w/female student
given folder with a womans picture - I.V. either attractive or unattractive woman
(but not woman male subject was to talk with) - Talked on phone to a female subject call
recorded - D.V.s
- Before call male rated expected friendliness
- After call male rated perceived friendliness
- Conversation rated for actual friendliness
19Snyder et al. Results
- Males expectations reflected stereotypes
- if thought they were going to talk to an
attractive woman--expected her to be friendlier
and perceived that she was friendlier than males
who thought they were talking to unattractive
woman - Males expectations were also a self-fulfilling
prophecy - Independent judges rated woman (thought to have
been attractive) to have been friendlier
20Factors Influencing Interpersonal Attraction
- Attraction in the short term
- Propinquity
- Physical attractiveness IQ personality
- Attitude similarity
- Long-term relationships
- Couples research (Rubin)
- Family systems
- The effects of co-habitation
- Neurotransmitters endorphins, oxytocin
21Attitude Similarity and Liking
- Attitude similarity correlates with liking
- Liking causes perception of similarity (Byrne and
Blaylock)--married couples - Perceived similarity causes liking
(Newcomb)--University of Michigan transfer
students
22Factors Influencing Interpersonal Attraction
- Attraction in the short term
- Propinquity
- Physical attractiveness IQ personality
- Attitude similarity
- Long-term relationships
- Couples research (Rubin)
- Family systems
- The effects of co-habitation
- Neurotransmitters endorphins, oxytocin
23Factors Influencing Interpersonal Attraction
- Attraction in the short term
- Propinquity
- Physical attractiveness IQ personality
- Attitude similarity
- Long-term relationships
- Couples research (Rubin)
- Family systems
- The effects of co-habitation
- Neurotransmitters endorphins, oxytocin
24Dating Couples (Rubin)
- Two-year study of dating couples in Boston
- 231 couples 95 students 97 white, 44
Catholic, 26 Protestant, 25 Jewish 25 lived
at home, 35 in apartments, 38 in dorms - Asked have had sexual intercourse? 80
- Living together? 20
25Dating Couples (Rubin)
- What percent had broken up?
- 45
- What was the effect of having had sex or living
together? - UNRELATED
26Similarily
- Together
- SAT .31
- Phy Attr .32
- Attitudes .50
- Breakup
- SAT .17
- Phy Attr .16
- Attitudes .41
27Factors Influencing Interpersonal Attraction
- Attraction in the short term
- Propinquity
- Physical attractiveness IQ personality
- Attitude similarity
- Long-term relationships
- Couples research (Rubin)
- The effects of co-habitation
- Family systems
- Neurotransmitters endorphins, oxytocin
28Bumpass, Sweet, and Cherlin (1991)
- Increase in living together prior to marriage
- 1970--11
- 1985--49 (recent first marriages)
- 40 of cohabitation couples break up without
getting married - After 1 1/2 years, half of cohabitating couples
are either broken up or married - Bumpass Sweet (1989)--50 higher disruption
rate of marriages that are preceded by living
together
29Causal Interpretations of a Correlation
- Cohabitation and divorce are correlated
- If two variables, A and B are correlated
- There are three explanations
- A causes B
- B causes A
- Third variable (C) or spurious correlation
explanation C causes both A and B
30Explanations for Correlation of Cohabitation and
Divorce
- Can divorce cause cohabitation? B causes A
- (1) Cohabiting causes higher divorce rate (e.g.,
Habits of relating to each other (that seem
appropriate to the unmarried) persist into
marriage. (p. 922) A causes B - (2) People in cohabiting unions are less well
adjusted C causes A and B - (3) People willing to cohabit are less
traditional in their values, more willing to
accept divorce as a solution to unhappiness C
causes A and B
31Bumpass, Martin Sweet (1991)
- National Survey of Families and Households
- Primary predictors of marital disruption
- Early age at marriage
- Low education
- Enrolled in school or worked during first year of
marriage - Cohabitated with spouse or others prior to
marriage
32Their Explanation for Cohabitation Effect
- the most compelling explanation seems to be one
of selection (Booth Johnson, 1988). That is,
it seems far more likely that cohabitation
signals preexisting differences in values and
relational styles than that the experience of
cohabitation itself reduces the likelihood of
marital stability. ( Bumpass, Martin Sweet,
1991, p. 32)
33Cunningham Antill (1994)
- Couples recruited through newspaper ads
- Comparing married couples who had M(C) and had
not M(NC) lived together prior to marriage - On a variety of variables measuring autonomy and
attachment, M(C) wives were significantly higher
in autonomy needs and significantly lower in
attachment needs than the M(NC) wives
34Brown Booth (1996)
- NSFH survey
- Relationship quality of cohabitating couples is
no different than that of married couples - Cohabitors without plans to marry are more likely
to have difficulty sustaining intimate
relationships
35Factors Influencing Interpersonal Attraction
- Attraction in the short term
- Propinquity
- Physical attractiveness IQ personality
- Attitude similarity
- Long-term relationships
- Couples research (Rubin)
- The effects of co-habitation
- Family systems
- Neurotransmitters endorphins, oxytocin
36Importance of family experience on relationships
- Hazen Shaver
- Attachment Theory (Bowlby)
- Secure Anxious Avoidant
- The attachment style developed in childhood is
significantly related to the type of romantic
relationships one has an adult.
37Hazen Shaver
- Respondents described their most important
romantic relationship and parenting from mother - Secure average relationship length 10 years
- Avoidant/ambivalent relationship length 6
years - Anxious relationships characterized by
preoccupation and extreme sexual attraction
relationship length 4 years
38Factors Influencing Interpersonal Attraction
- Attraction in the short term
- Propinquity
- Physical attractiveness IQ personality
- Attitude similarity
- Long-term relationships
- Couples research (Rubin)
- Family systems
- The effects of co-habitation
- Neurotransmitters endorphins, oxytocin
39Neuropsychology of Sex and Attraction
- Love is universal (anthropologist
Jankowiak)--evolutionary contribution - PEA (phenylethylamine)--falling in love
- low PEA levels might lead to seeking
relationships to increase PEA levels (Liebowitz,
1983) - Oxytocin (hormone)--bonding
- levels increase following sexual arousal and
orgasm nursing mothers as well - Endorphins (endogenous opiates)
40Conclusion
- Attraction a combination of
- Evolutionary development
- Brain chemicals
- Childhood experiences
- Situational factors