Associations Between Caregiving Instability and Adopted Childrens Inhibitory Control Abilities - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 1
About This Presentation
Title:

Associations Between Caregiving Instability and Adopted Childrens Inhibitory Control Abilities

Description:

Associations Between Caregiving Instability and Adopted Children's ... Developmental Psychobiology, 29, 315-334. Gerstadt, C., Hong, Y., & Diamond, A. (1994) ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:53
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 2
Provided by: jasone8
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Associations Between Caregiving Instability and Adopted Childrens Inhibitory Control Abilities


1
Associations Between Caregiving Instability and
Adopted Childrens Inhibitory Control Abilities
Erin Lewis, Mary Dozier, John P. Ackerman, and
Sandra Sepulveda Kozakowski
Figure
Introduction

Measures
  • Inhibitory control refers to the ability to
    inhibit a dominant response while holding two
    rules in working memory
  • Inhibitory control develops considerably between
    the ages of two and five years and is dependent
    on prefrontal cortex development
  • Deficits in inhibitory control have been
    associated with attention problems,
    hyperactivity, social incompetence, aggression,
    and academic failure
  • Early adverse caregiving experiences have been
    associated with deficits in prefrontal cortex
    development as well as deficits in behavioral
    inhibition
  • Children in foster care are at increased risk of
    developing behavior problems suggestive of
    inhibitory control deficits
  • Caregiving Instability
  • Number of foster placements was assessed from
    case records
  • For adopted children, number of placements
    ranged from 1 to 5 (M 1.7 SD 1.0)
  • Inhibitory Control and Working Memory (Gerstadt
    et al., 1994)
  • Two card games in which children needed to
    remember two newly learned rules
  • In each card game, children were given 2
    learning trials followed by 16 test trials (8
    cards of each type)

p lt .01

Day/Night Stroop Task Requires children to
remember two rules and inhibit a dominant
response
Say Night
Say Day
The Present Study
Working Memory Task Requires children to
remember two rules but does not require
inhibition of a dominant response (serves as
a Control task)
Conclusions
  • In this study, we examined whether caregiving
    instability experienced in infancy
  • and toddlerhood predicted adopted childrens
    inhibitory control abilities at the
  • age of five or six years
  • Three groups of children were included children
    who had never been placed in foster care,
    adopted children who had been in a stable
    adoptive placement, and adopted children who
    had experienced multiple foster placements
  • We expected children in the multiple placements
    group to have poorer inhibitory control
    abilities than children who had experienced more
    stable caregiving
  • Adopted children who had experienced multiple
    foster placements prior to adoption (i.e.,
    caregiving instability) performed worse on the
    Day/Night Stroop Task at age five or six compared
    to children who had never been placed in foster
    care and to adopted children who had experienced
    one stable placement
  • Caregiving instability was predictive of poorer
    inhibitory control even after controlling for
    age, IQ, and working memory abilities (i.e.,
    control task)
  • Stability of care predicted inhibitory control
    better than age at first placement, prenatal
    substance exposure, prematurity, or maltreatment
    history
  • The results suggest the importance of placing
    foster children into pre-adoptive homes when
    possible and limiting the number of placement
    disruptions that children experience

 
Say White
Say Black
Results
Summary of Block Entry Regression Analysis for
Variables Predicting Childrens Day/Night Stroop
Task Performance (N 102)
Sample
  • R2 0.11 for Step 1
  • ?R2 0.07 for Step 2
  • R2 0.18 for Full Model

Selected References
Diamond, A., Taylor, C. (1996). Development of
an aspect of executive control Development of
the abilities to remember what I said and to Do
as I say, not as I do. Developmental
Psychobiology, 29, 315-334.Gerstadt, C., Hong,
Y., Diamond, A. (1994). The relationship
between cognition and action Performance of
children 3.5 to 7 years old on a Stroop-like
day-night test. Cognition, 53, 129-153.Kochanska
, G., Murray, K. T., Harlan, E. T. (2000).
Effortful control in early childhood Continuity
and change, antecedents, and implications for
social development. Developmental Psychology, 36,
220-232.
p lt .05 p lt .01
Poster presented at the Society for Research on
Child Development Biennial Meeting, Boston, MA
(March 29, 2007)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com