Risk Assessment - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 17
About This Presentation
Title:

Risk Assessment

Description:

Products of artificial and natural processes. Benzo(a)pyrene (BaP) Chrysene. 5-Methylchrysene ... 30 mM Benzo(a)Pyrene (BaP) - With S9 Rat Liver - Negative ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:156
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 18
Provided by: melissas5
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Risk Assessment


1
Risk Assessment
  • PAHs in Binary Mixtures
  • Melissa Stafford REU 2003

2
Summary
  • A Risk Assessment of PAHs in Binary Mixtures
  • PAHs
  • Toxicity
  • Complex Mixtures
  • Ames Assay
  • Results and Conclusions

3
Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons - PAHs
  • Potent animal Carcinogens
  • Products of artificial and natural processes

Benzo(a)pyrene (BaP)
5-Methylchrysene
Chrysene
4
Natural Sources
Artificial Sources
Grilled Meat
Forest fires
Tobacco Smoke
Car Exhaust
Volcanic Eruptions
5
PAH Metabolism
Aromatic Hydrocarbon Receptor
6
PAH Metabolism
Tyrosine Kinase
7
PAH Metabolism
Cytochrome P450 - CYP1A1 -
BaP
BaP-7,8-diol-9,10epoxide
8
Mutations
G to T Transversion
9
Research Objectives
  • To characterize the interactions of prevalent
    mutagenic PAHs
  • Improve our understanding of complex mixtures of
    PAHs in the environment.

10
Toxicity Assessments
1 1 2
Additive
EPA
?
Synergistic
Inhibition
1 1 0
1 1 5
11
Methods - The Ames Assay
U
Mutagen
Testor Strain
Histidine
Histidine
The more bacteria that live the higher the
mutagenicity!!
12
Ames Assay
  • What to add
  • Salmonella TA98
  • Histidine and Biotin
  • S9 rat liver
  • Minimal Top Agar
  • Chemical

13
Ames Assay - Results
Positive Control - 2-NitroFlourine -
783 revertants
30 mM Benzo(a)Pyrene (BaP) - With S9 Rat Liver -
Negative Control - BaP without S9 -
337 revertants
37 revertants
14
5-MethylChrysene/BaP Mixtures
  • 25 reduction in net revertants
  • 12.02 standard deviation between trials
  • 30 reduction would be considered significant

15
Chrysene/BaP Mixtures
  • 30 reduction in net revertants
  • 96.87 standard deviation between trails
  • Discrepancy probably due to degraded Chrysene

16
Conclusions
  • The data show an overall additive trend
  • The inhibition we found is at too insignificant a
    level for the EPA to change current methods.
  • Data from this and GJIC will be plugged into QSAR
    for calibration.

17
Acknowledgments
  • I would like to thank
  • Erica Reese for her undying patience and teaching
    ability
  • Dr. Autenrieth for her guidance, understanding
    and affection
  • Dr. Donnelly for the use of his lab and extensive
    knowledge of the Ames Assay and PAHs.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com