Mulches: Organic and synthetic - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 33
About This Presentation
Title:

Mulches: Organic and synthetic

Description:

Mulches: Organic and synthetic – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:1036
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 34
Provided by: simg7
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Mulches: Organic and synthetic


1
Mulches Organic and synthetic
  • Harsimran Rosie Gill and R. McSorley
  • University of Florida

2
Mulches and Organic Amendments
  • Mulch
  • Material applied to soil surface
  • Amendment
  • Material mixed into soil

3
Organic materials used as amendments
(biodegradable)
  • Crop residues, green manures
  • Cellulose (wood chips, sawdust, paper, etc.)
  • Municipal solid waste (sewage sludge, etc.)
  • Animal manures
  • Processing byproducts (food waste, oil cakes,
    etc.)
  • Seaweed, crab chitin, fish emulsion, etc.
  • Peat moss, leaves, etc.

4
Types of mulches
  • Organic materials (crop residues min.
    tillage)
  • Living mulches (intercrop crop planted into
    established cover crop like clover, other legume)
  • Paper
  • Plastic

5
Synthetic mulches
Organic mulches
6
Organic mulches
  • Organic mulches- living, containing any kind of
    organic material like hay, straw, pine needles,
    shredded bark, and sawdust, etc.

7
Benefits of Mulches
  • Many of the benefits of surface crop residues in
    minimum tillage, including
  • Moisture conservation (evaporation much reduced
    if mulch is thick)
  • Reduced erosion
  • Improved quality of surface water, moderate soil
    temp., etc.

8
Contd.
  • Many of the benefits of surface crop residues in
    minimum tillage
  • Soil fertility and structure --- improves over
    time, but depends on extent to which mulch is
    incorporated into soil
  • Weed management depends on thickness of mulch

9
Objective
  • To determine the impact of organic mulches on
    soil surface insect community

10
Materials and Methods
  • Location - Plant Science Research and Education
    Unit, Citra, FL
  • Main crop- Roma bush beans (TOS- 4th Oct, 2007)

www. plantscienceunit.ifas.ufl.edu
11
Pine bark
Sorghum- sudangrass
Cowpea
Sunnhemp
12
CN Ratio
13
Experimental plot design
8 ft
15 ft
C- Control, PB- Pine bark, SH- Sunnhemp, SO-
Sorghum sudangrass, CP- Cowpea
10 ft
10 ft
15 ft
15 ft
10 ft
Treatments- 5 Replications- 5
15 ft
14
(No Transcript)
15
Cowpea Mulch Low CN ratio Breaks down quickly
16
Observations
  • Pitfall sampling of insects- 1/Plot
  • Total traps in field- 25
  • Traps kept every 15 days
  • Number of sampling dates- 5
  • Wooden board sampling- 1/Plot
  • Total boards in field- 25
  • Board kept every month
  • Number of sampling dates- 3

17
Result Pitfall Data
Coll- Collembola
a
ab
ab
bc
c
Insects and Date
18
Results- Pitfall Data
  • Insects of many different orders and families
    found in pitfall traps
  • Collembola, Spider, Mites
  • Beetles (Gyrinidae, Elateridae, Chrysomelidae,
    Coccinelidae, Staphylinidae)
  • Grasshoppers, and Crickets (Gryllidae, Acrididae)
  • Flies (Dolichopodidae)
  • Ants, Wasps, and Parasitoids
  • Leaf hoppers (Cicadellidae)
  • Other insects (Aphididae, Noctuidae, Muscidae,
    Labiduridae, Delphacidae)
  • Pictures at http//edis.ifas.ufl.edu/in876

19
  • Synthetic Mulches

20
Synthetic Mulches - Plastic
  • Seal in Fumigants
  • Reduce evaporation, conserve water
  • Reduce weeds
  • Solarization
  • H. Gill solarization experiments

21
Objectives
  • Compare plastic sheets from different companies
    in terms of
  • Durability to sunlight
  • Weed growth

22
Materials and Methods
  • Location - Plant Science Research and Education
    Unit, Citra, FL
  • Replications - 5
  • Plot size - 35 ft8 ft

www. plantscienceunit.ifas.ufl.edu
Best time - First week of July
23
Contd.
  • Treatments
  • ISO (ISO Poly Films, Inc., Gray Court, SC)
  • VeriPack (VeriPack Inc., Framingham, MA)
  • Poly Pak (Poly Pak Plastics, Medford, MN)
  • Bromostop (Bruno Rimini Corp., London, UK)
  • White plastic (Rodeo Plastic Bag Film,
    Mesquite, TX) Control

24
Experimental plot design
8 ft
WP- White plastic, PP- Polypak, VP- Veri pack,
BS-Bromostop, ISO Tractor applied VP, PP, WP
Manual ISO, BS
35 ft
5.5 ft
10 ft
Treatments - 5 Replications - 5
25
(No Transcript)
26
Data collected
  • Identification and counting of weeds
  • Number of tears (Durability) and size of tears

27
(No Transcript)
28
Large
Small
Extra large
29
Small tears in different plastic sheets
a
ab
a
bc
a
a
ab
bc
b
b
15-Aug
22-Aug
28-Aug
6-Sep
Date
30
Tears area in different plastic sheets
22-Aug
28-Aug
6-Sep
Date
31
Nutsedges in different plastic sheets
1-Aug
15-Aug
6-Sep
20-Sep
2-Oct
Date
32
Comparison of other weeds in different plastic
sheets
P- Purslane, Cw- Cudweed, Hi- Hairy Indigo, G-
Grasses, Bl- Broad leaves
a
a
b
a
a
ab
a
ab
ab
ab
a
b
b
ab
ab
b
b
b
Weed type and Date
33
Take home points
  • Tear numbers, weed numbers, - highest in White
    Plastic (WP)
  • Tears area most in Bromostop (BS) followed by
    White Plastic (WP)
  • Durability Poly Pak (PP) and ISO gave excellent
    performance
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com