Blanco Instruments 20042008 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 7
About This Presentation
Title:

Blanco Instruments 20042008

Description:

Blanco Instruments 20042008 – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:39
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 8
Provided by: alis96
Learn more at: https://decam.fnal.gov
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Blanco Instruments 20042008


1
(No Transcript)
2
Blanco Instruments 2004-2008
  • Instrument 2004 2005 2006 2007 Replacement
  • Mosaic 8K CCD Imager yes yes yes yes
  • ISPI 2K IR Imager yes yes -- -- NEWFIRM
  • NEWFIRM 8K IR Imager share share
  • HYDRA MOS (Fiber) yes yes yes yes
  • RC Spectrograph yes (SOAR)
  • Echelle Spectrograph yes ? ? (SOAR)

3
Southern Hemisphere US facilities 2004-2008
  • SOAR 4.2-m -gt 6 x 6 arcmin field, Adaptive
    optics
  • Gemini 8m -gt narrow-field MOS spectroscopy OIR
    instruments, MCAO. Second generation instruments
    (2008-2009) still to be defined may include
    KAOS.
  • Magellan 6.5-m (x 2) -gt One telescope will have
    F/5 (like MMT), share Megaprime (24x24 arcmin)
  • SALT 11-m -gt spectroscopy, specialized, no public
    time anticipated

4
Mosaic II
  • Plusses
  • Good site, good telescope, good photometry
  • Reliable - (except we have a failed CCD)
  • Rapid filter change (lt 10 seconds), lots of
    filters, fast shutter (10 ms uniformity)
  • Minuses
  • Image quality issues - telescope, corrector,
    environment?
  • Slow readout (1.5 minutes in 16-channel mode)
  • Capable, but complex data acquisition system -
    both hardware and software
  • SPIE 3355 CCDs - 487, Software - 497, Hardware
    -577 (1998)

5
Mosaic II - Improvements?
  • Replace the failed CCD (March 2004)
  • Improve the telescope imaging performance
  • Telescope primary mirror radial supports
  • Telescope active optics system
  • Dome environment
  • Evaluate corrector performance
  • Pipelines for data reduction
  • Data into NOAO archive

6
Performance metrics
  • LSST metrics
  • (a) Faint Time window A ? ? / ?(psf) ? ?1/2
  • (b) Faint stellar A ? ? / ?(psf) ?1/2
  • (c) Faint resolved galaxies A ? ? / ?1/2
  • Where sky noise limited exposures are assumed in
    all cases, and
  • A Telescope primary area
  • ? Detector area
  • ? efficiency (everything from clouds to readout
    time)
  • ?(psf) area of stellar point spread function
  • ? cycle time
  • ? background sky brightness

7
Performance Comparison
  • Faint Galaxy Performance (A?? / ?1/2)
  • LSST 79
  • PanSTARS 15
  • CFHT Megacam 2.7
  • Subaru 2.2
  • SDSS 1.7
  • VST 1.4
  • VISTA (IR) 0.93
  • CTIO 4m Mosaic 0.9
  • CTIO 4m DEC (2deg2) 11
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com