WREZ Technical Committee - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 34
About This Presentation
Title:

WREZ Technical Committee

Description:

ZITA criteria to refine CSAs into proposed REZs ... Not quant. Oregon. 3. 93,800. Washington. 3. 66,000. California. 3. 120,500. Nevada. 3. 44,700 ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:70
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 35
Provided by: Bla478
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: WREZ Technical Committee


1
WREZ Technical Committee
  • Briefing Webcast Part 2
  • December 18, 2008

2
Agenda Review
  • ZITA criteria to refine CSAs into proposed REZs
  • EL/STG exclusion areas and initial avoidance
    areas, criteria for categorizing land within
    proposed REZs, and wildlife data request
  • Public comment package
  • Public notice details of request and process
  • Documents included in package
  • Review draft Phase 1 Report outline

3
Purpose
  • Brief Technical Committee on information about
    WREZ model and WECC study request to be presented
    at January meeting
  • Answer questions and secure feedback on materials
    to achieve approval in January
  • Approve WREZ model documents for public comment
  • Approve submission of study request to WECC

4
REZ Map Creation and AnalysisDRAFT FOR
DISCUSSION
  • Black Veatch
  • December 18, 2008

5
Agenda
  • REZ Identification Process
  • Draft REZ maps
  • Remaining data needs

6
Caveat
  • All maps shown today are for example only
  • They are indicative of current progress, but not
    final results
  • There are known (large) holes
  • They are for discussion purposes only

7
Each states wind CSAs include the best wind
resources in that state
8
Each states solar CSA includes only the best
solar resource in that state
Lower quality solar may supplement other
resources in some regions
9
ZITAs CSA resource maps are being transformed
into REZ maps in five major steps
  • Develop exclusions
  • Apply exclusions
  • Generate a grid
  • Identify REZ areas
  • Quantify biomass, non-REZ defining hydropower,
    undiscovered geothermal potential

10
Avoid areas developed by EL and ZITAs
exclusions were applied to the CSA maps
  • EL provided a number of environmental exclusion
    area types that are excluded from development
  • Statutorily excluded areas
  • Non-statutorily excluded consensus-avoid areas
    agreed upon by the work group members
  • ZITA provided technical exclusions that exclude
    certain areas from development in addition to the
    minimum resource criteria
  • Slope
  • Land use (urban areas, water bodies)
  • Military restrictions
  • Minimum contiguous land area needed for project
    development

11
PRELIMINARY DRAFT FOR COMMENT ONLY
12
(No Transcript)
13
(No Transcript)
14
(No Transcript)
15
(No Transcript)
16
(No Transcript)
17
(No Transcript)
18
(No Transcript)
19
NOTE Discovered, conventional geothermal
resources, which will also define REZs, are in
the process of being assessed
20
Minimum and maximum REZ size criteria will be
used to identify REZs
  • Minimum REZ size
  • Solar thermal, wind and large hydro (Canada
    only) 1500 MW
  • Discovered, conventional geothermal 500 MW
  • Maximum REZ size
  • A collector system cost of 10 per MWh

21
Remaining data needs
  • Discovered, conventional geothermal data for
    Idaho and Utah
  • Decision on the treatment of military lands and
    airspace as exclusion areas
  • Biomass data for each REZ
  • Canadian hydropower cost information
  • Final exclusion areas from EL

22
EL/STG Public Comment Documents
  • Qualified Resource Area maps will include
  • Exclusion areas development precluded by
    statute or regulation (i.e. National Parks,
    Wilderness Areas)
  • Initial avoidance areas based on purpose,
    policy, restrictions, conflict or controversy
  • Qualified Resource Area maps will not include
  • No wildlife assessment in maps wildlife data
    collection and assessment will take place from
    December March
  • Wildlife maps early April
  • Categorization Criteria to be applied to
    wildlife lands data

23
EL/STG Wildlife Data Request
  • EL assisted STG and Western Governors Wildlife
    Council in developing a targeted wildlife data
    request.
  • Sent out December 17 to
  • State Agencies
  • NGOs
  • Federal Agencies
  • Universities/Professional Organizations
  • Data will go to states for review and analysis,
    with input from EL

24
WREZ Public Comment
  • WREZ charter calls for maximized transparency and
    public outreach as integral to the WREZ
    initiative
  • A well designed and publicized public comment
    period will help meet these goals by
  • ensuring interested parties/individuals are aware
    of the WREZ initiative,
  • keeping them updated on developments, and
  • providing an opportunity to submit comments.
  • The Technical Committee previously approved a
    public outreach strategy that included a 30-day
    public comment period on draft materials.

25
WREZ Public Comment
  • 30-day public comment period is scheduled to
    begin February 1 on draft work-group products
    approved by the Technical and Steering
    Committees. These include
  • Qualified Resource Areas  with exclusion areas
    and avoidance areas
  • criteria that will be used to identify sensitive
    wildlife habitats within Q RAs
  • assumptions for the development of cost curves to
    calculate renewable energy generation costs
    within the QRAs and
  • transmission model inputs.
  •  After EL/STG meeting, we are proposing to the
    TC that we switch from using the term proposed
    REZs to qualified resource areas.

26
WREZ Public Comment
  • WGA will establish a Web-based platform to
    support the public comment documents and to
    receive written comments.
  • Public comments will not be made public until
    the public comment period has ended.
  • Each document approved for posting will include a
    brief description of the document, methodology
    for how the document was prepared and the
    assumptions that went into it, and how the
    document fits in the broader WREZ process.
  • There may also be key questions posed if a Work
    Group is seeking specific feedback on a topic.

27
Public Comment Website
  • The Web site will be organized as follows
  • Home Page for WREZ Comments
  • Providing adequate background on the WREZ
    initiative
  • links to the main WREZ Web page
  • brief description on how to submit comments
  • deadlines and any other necessary information

28
Public Comment Website
  • Categories of WREZ Materials for Public Comment
  • Four proposed categories of materials will be
    established to help guide the public review of
    WREZ materials and the submission of public
    comments
  •  Renewable resources - includes ZITA criteria for
    refining CSAs into QRAs
  • Exclusions - includes EL exclusion areas and
    initial avoidance areas, and categorization
    criteria
  • Supply curves - includes ZITA technology
    assumptions
  • Transmission Model includes background and
    assumptions

29
Submitting Comments
  • Under each of the four categories, there will be
    links to the document, background information,
    potential questions from the Work Group, and a
    link to a comment form for electronic submittal
  • Click here to submit your comments
  • The link will take you to a comment form where
    comments can be typed or attached as a Word
    document.  Also included will be a space for
    providing contact information and representation

30
Managing Received Public Comments
  • WGA staff will initially collect, track and
    synthesize the public comments
  • State-specific comments or those from a
    state-specific stakeholder, will be forwarded
    promptly to the Technical Committee member from
    that state
  • WGA staff will be responsible for synthesizing
    the comments by subject matter and, as
    appropriate, preparing a recommendation for
    addressing the comment
  • Within 10 days following the public comment
    period, the synthesis and any recommendations
    will be forwarded to the Technical Committee or
    one of the Work Groups for consideration as
    appropriate.

31
Role of the TC and Work Groups in Public Comment
Review
  • Technical Committee and/or Work Groups are
    ultimately responsible for making a determination
    on disposition of the public comments
  • If Chairs of the Technical Committee or the Work
    Groups accept a WGA recommendation, that decision
    will be relayed to the entire Technical Committee
    or respective work group for their information
  • Chairs may also decide to hold a conference call
    with their membership to consider the public
    comment and WGAs recommendation

32
Wrapping Up the February Public Comment Period
  • WGA staff will create a log for how public
    comments were addressed and rationale for why
    public comments were not addressed
  • Once the Technical Committee or the Work Groups
    have completed the public comment review, WGA
    will make the public comments and the response
    log public on the WREZ Web site. Commentors will
    be made aware that these documents will be made
    public
  • Within one month following the conclusion of the
    public comment period, WGA will review the
    comments and draft recommendations, which will
    be reviewed and revised as directed by the
    Technical Committee
  • The final product will then go to the Steering
    Committee for final approval

33
Proposed Report Outline
  • June 13-14 at WGA annual meeting in Park City
  • Covers Phase 1 only
  • Project history and description
  • Describe the efforts of the working groups
  • Western Renewable Energy Zone maps
  • Includes non-REZ resource maps
  • Will not have recommendations this will be the
    responsibility of the Staff Council

34
Upcoming Meetings
  • Advance meeting materials approx. January 9
  • Technical Meeting January 13-14
  • Hotel information draft agenda on WREZ website
  • Steering Committee briefing webcast at end of
    meeting in January 14
  • Steering Committee webcast approve public
    comment package January 23 (time TBD)
  • REMINDER Monday, December 29 input your
    availability for a webcast on the WECC study
    request Jan 6 or 7
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com