UPR Oracle EBusiness Suite Implementation - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 12
About This Presentation
Title:

UPR Oracle EBusiness Suite Implementation

Description:

Look ahead to this quarter's activities. 3. EXETER GROUP, INC. 2005 PROPRIETARY AND CONFIDENTIAL. PATSI Progress Assessment & 1st Quarter Highlights ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:166
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 13
Provided by: egfram
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: UPR Oracle EBusiness Suite Implementation


1
UPR Oracle E-Business Suite Implementation
  • Steering Committee Presentation

April 11, 2005
Exeter Team
Jonathan Kutchins Jason Shaffner Phil Cifarelli
2
Objectives for Todays Presentation
  • Review the progress of the project
  • Review financial condition of the project
  • Discuss issues that warrant the Committees
    attention
  • Look ahead to this quarters activities

3
PATSI Progress Assessment 1st Quarter Highlights
  • Overall the project is proceeding exceedingly
    well to date
  • Undergraduate Admissions is on track for its
    September 1st go-live
  • SWS/PSP is on schedule for the institutional
    course catalog to be in place by late summer
    (exact date TBD)
  • Financials mini-phase addressing chart of account
    re-design finished under budget allowing the
    project team to
  • Begin the Financials implementation this month
  • Do some preliminary work in Enrollment Records
    starting in May
  • First round of campus visits is almost complete
    (two remaining) excellent feedback received

4
PATSI Progress Assessment 1st Quarter
Highlights (cont)
  • Key elements of the communications plan have been
    enacted
  • PATSI web site has been working very well and is
    proving very popular
  • First quarterly newsletter finished and ready for
    distribution
  • Exeter has added two Spanish-speaking resources
    to its team with more to come
  • Oracle Development instance is up and running
  • Modified goals of HR mini-phase addressing
    organizational structure from verifying structure
    to coaching HR team on process mapping and
    redesign/standardization.
  • Organizational structure information gathered
    will be validated during SWS/PSP and Financials
    configuration efforts.
  • Exeter will assist the UPR HR team with process
    mapping and redesign/standardization efforts.

5
Current Issues Warranting the Committees
Attention
  • Oracle On Demand arrangement not in place yet
  • Oracle support and license issues
  • Office space for project team
  • Allocation of UPR staff to the project
  • Need for on-going attention to project-related
    human resource issues

6
Discussion of the Issues
  • Oracle On Demand arrangement not in place yet
  • Significance Lack of resolution has potential
    to negatively impact the project plan by delaying
    the preparation of the technical infrastructure
  • Possible Course of Action Expedite On Demand
    contract negotiation execution.
  • Resolution of On Demand contract needed by April
    15, 2005.
  • Critical Dependency Since On Demand is expected
    to be a 1-year solution, it is critical that
    servers and related hardware for the in-house
    production system be ordered soon to ensure
    timely delivery and provide adequate time for set
    up and training. The hardware order should be
    placed by May 31, 2005. It is also important to
    project a target date when the production
    instance will move back in-house, so migration
    plans can be developed to ensure a smooth
    transition.

7
Discussion of the Issues (cont)
  • Oracle support and license issues
  • Significance University needs to...
  • Maintain support to ensure project stays on
    trackUniversity is currently behind on payments
    to Oracle
  • Renew support for current licenses by May 20,
    2005 and
  • Ascertain whether there are enough licenses for
    all eventual users of the system.
  • Possible Courses of Action
  • Bring account with Oracle current
  • Process renewal on a timely basis and
  • Complete in-house user census currently
    in-progress, compare to current licenses owned,
    and work with Oracle to resolve shortages
  • Resolution needed by April 30, 2005

8
Discussion of the Issues (cont)
  • Office space for project team
  • Significance Project will not proceed
    effectively without adequate space for the team.
    Ideally the location should be spacious enough
    for centralization of Exeter staff, full time UPR
    resources (e.g. UPR Project Manager), and
    testing.
  • Possible Course of Action Exeter has presented a
    space requirements document to UPR Project
    Manager- University needs to determine how to
    allocate space. As the University considers how
    to meet this requirement, it might wish to
    consider renting space. Other Universities have
    done this successfully for their ERP projects.
  • Resolution needed by May 31, 2005

9
Discussion of the Issues (cont)
  • Allocation of UPR staff to the project
  • Significance Two dimensions to this issue
  • Technical staff at campuses are becoming
    overextended as more modules begin
    implementation and
  • Lack of depth on smaller campuses (e.g. one
    Payroll person at Humacao) presents a dilemma as
    to how they will assist with system
    implementation, do their current job, and learn
    to use the new system
  • Possible Course of Action
  • Divide conquer by regionalizing campus-based
    technical resources to be responsible for one or
    two sub-modules as opposed to all sub-modules
    and
  • Find a means to back fill key resources at the
    campuses to allow them time to work on the
    project
  • Resolution needed by June 30, 2005

10
Discussion of the Issues (cont)
  • Need for on-going attention to project related
    human resource issues
  • Significance General observations and feedback
    received from campus visits suggest formal time
    and attention needs to be devoted to
  • Reallocation of duties among centralized and
    campus-based technical resources and
  • Working with functional users over the life of
    the project to help them through the transition
    to the new system, especially with respect to the
    new responsibilities theyll be taking on as a
    result of the system (i.e. in Oracle functional
    users bear greater responsibility for IT
    processes and reporting)
  • Possible Course of Action In addition to the
    work currently underway with the unions to change
    job descriptions, the University might consider
    appointing someone to oversee human resource
    issues for the project on a half-time or
    full-time basis and charge that person with the
    development of a transition plan.
  • Such activities are recommended to be ongoing for
    the life of the project and into post go-live.

11
Current Quarters (Quarter ending June 30, 2005)
Planned Activities
  • Proceed with Undergraduate Admissions
    implementation
  • Proceed with SWS/PSP implementation
  • Begin Financials implementation
  • Undertake preliminary work for Enrollment and
    Records implementation
  • Assist UPR HR team with process mapping and
    redesign/standardization
  • Bring Oracle training instance up (contingent
    upon receipt of servers)
  • Configure Oracle On Demand test instance
    (contingent upon execution of On Demand contract)

12
If you would like more information at any time,
please do not hesitate to contact us.Jason
Shaffner JShaffner_at_exeter.com Phil
Cifarelli PCifarelli_at_exeter.com Please
visit the project web site at http//patsi.upr.
edu
Questions?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com