Motorola GSD SelfAudits - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Motorola GSD SelfAudits

Description:

A 'snapshot in time', taken by qualified people in a field of ... Quick-step to success: POLICIES of focus areas on ColorChart. are the Policies Documented? ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:85
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 14
Provided by: Bil9156
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Motorola GSD SelfAudits


1
Motorola GSD Self-Audits
  • How does it work / what do we do?
  • 1.) What is an audit?
  • 2.) What is the procedure?
  • 3.) What are the judgement parameters
  • 4.) How are metrics (ColorChart) evaluated?
  • 5.) What are the deliverables
  • 6.) How can you prepare your site / people

2
What is an Audit
  • A "snapshot in time, taken by qualified people
    in a field of endeavour to assess the
    competencies of people, policies processes for
    compliance with a set group of guidelines
    (model), executed over time (in the past) that
    should, philosophically, predict the competencies
    of the people, policies processes into the
    future.

3
Audit Schedule -1week/site
  • Day1 team arrives, intros, logistics, audit team
    reviews documents (nights?)
  • Day2-3 interview admin staff / users audit team
    reviews documents
  • Day 4 a.m. first draft report to admin mgr
    MD p.m. review action item list
  • Day 5 help / update support admin staff.

4
Document Review
  • Read policy documents to determine applicability
    relevance under CM, dual author, etc.
  • Read process document for similar content
  • Review log-files (raw and/or filtered) for
    appropriate content. Log-file procedures for
    applicability. Log-file filtering scripts for
    completeness relevance.
  • Select documents subject areas at random.

5
Interview people to evaluate
  • Understanding of
  • Policy - what is it, why is it there, what are
    the consequences of not following the policy
  • Process - same
  • Log-file processes - why how consequence
  • Tailor interview to how the interviewee
  • Interacts with the issue (user / manager / admin)
  • Background, knowledge, culture, impact of issue

6
Success vs Opportunity
  • Judgement calls on Success vs Opportunity and
    red / yellow / green needs guidelines
  • Does Policy begat Process which is
  • Universally understood by all individuals
  • Well documented in print / electronic form with
    CM
  • Being followed, rigourously, over time with
    documented evidence, thereof
  • IF all these are true, then Yellow or Success (if
    true for one year, then Green)

7
Success vs Opportunity (2 of 2)
  • From the Audit Color Chart Legend (pg4)
  • Green all (parts of) this subject-area comply
    and are documented have been followed for 1
    year
  • Yellow - very large majority (more than 50) of
    this subject area comply (policy, process, both
    documented, periodic follow-up) but do not have
    1 year of documented evidence.
  • Red - some portion of this subject area has no
    documented policy, no documented process

8
Final Report what to expect (1/2)
  • Intro
  • Who we (audit team) are, what site we audited,
    what our process was (document review,
    interviews, etc.)
  • What subject areas or issues we reviewed OS
    security, web-access-controls, router ACLs,
    DRP/BIA/testing, backup, physical, POPI, others.
  • Body
  • 1 short section for each issue/subject area - as
    the following example

9
Final Report what to expect (2/2)
  • What we found 1 short summary per issue
  • In the area of Web Access Controls we find
  • Excellently written policy, well documented,
    under CM.
  • Adopted process / procedure template which covers
    2/3 of policy. (template appears to have been
    adopted from another organization with minimal
    tailoring for local conditions)
  • Log-file collection system in place, set of
    log-file filters run on a regular basis. Little
    documentation that a human reviews either the raw
    or filtered logs on a regular basis reports.
  • Risk high potential for intrusions to go
    undetected
  • Color - Yellow - there is some support for this
    area, however, the key point of regular review
    does not exist

10
Action Items(appendix to report)
  • Action Item List - one section in the report
    per subject area or issue example
  • Web-Access Controls
  • 1.) web-access-controls process template review
    with admin, legal, hr by dd_mon_1999 owner
    JoeAdmin
  • 2.) put above document under configuration
    management by dd_mon_1999 owner JennySQA
  • 3.) write policy for log-file-review by
    dd_mon_1999 owner MaryAdmin

11
Action Items(appendix to report)
  • Select individual to process / document log-file
    reviews by dd_mon_2000 owner MissyLog
  • Etc. etc. etc.
  • IF there is excellent policy/process/follow-up
    then say so.
  • Orient all recommendations / actions as Positive

12
Quick-step to success
  • POLICIES of focus areas on ColorChart
  • are the Policies Documented?
  • PROCESS or PROCEDURE for the implementation of
    every POLICY area?
  • Are these Procedures Documented?
  • Evidence (documentation) procedure has been
    followed, over time (1 year, min?)

13
One-Sentence Summary
  • Man-hours on process documentation.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com