Theories about intergenerational solidarity - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 42
About This Presentation
Title:

Theories about intergenerational solidarity

Description:

Doing something that is a benefit to the other (and a cost to you) Both directions: ... Quid pro quo (Something for something) Delayed exchange ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:286
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 43
Provided by: matthijs2
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Theories about intergenerational solidarity


1
Theories about intergenerational solidarity
  • Matthijs Kalmijn
  • Department of Social Cultural Sciences
  • Tilburg University, Netherlands
  • Lecture for Socrates Intensive Program 2006

2
Intergenerational solidarity
  • Exchanges between (older) parents and (grown-up)
    children

3
Types of support
  • Practical support (services)
  • Financial support
  • Social support (visits, contact, attention)

4
Definition
  • Doing something that is a benefit to the other
    (and a cost to you)
  • Both directions
  • Upward (from children to parents)
  • Downward (from parents to children)

5
Research issues
  • Variation in intergenerational solidarity
  • Across individuals
  • Across social groups
  • Across countries
  • Over time

6
(No Transcript)
7
(No Transcript)
8
(No Transcript)
9
(No Transcript)
10
(No Transcript)
11
(No Transcript)
12
Theories
  • Exchange
  • Altruism
  • Norms

13
Theories - continued
  • Emphasized by different disciplines
  • Norms traditional sociological model of man
  • Exchange traditional economic model of man
  • Altruism psychology and sociology
  • Competing theories
  • Which theory is most valid?
  • More general theoretical issue
  • How do we explain peoples social behavior?

14
(1) Exchange
  • Rational actors
  • Considerations of costs and benefits for ego
  • Selfish actors
  • Act only when benefits ego gt costs ego
  • People do something for their parents because it
    makes them better off

15
Forms of exchange
  • Direct exchange
  • Quid pro quo (Something for something)
  • Delayed exchange
  • Parents invest in children early in life and
    children give support back later
  • Insurance element
  • Uncertainty
  • Prospective exchange
  • Children give support to parents in order to
    receive something later from their parents

16
Empirical test 1
  • Hypothesis
  • The support of parents to children decreases over
    the life course and the support of children to
    parents increases over the life course

17
(No Transcript)
18
Empirical test 2
  • Hypothesis
  • The more parents have invested in children when
    the children are young, the more support they
    receive from the children when they are old

19
(No Transcript)
20
Empirical test 3
  • Hypothesis
  • The more wealth parents have, the more often
    children visit their parents
  • Research on bequests
  • Confirms hypothesis!
  • Only in multiple child families

21
(2) Altruism
  • Critique on exchange
  • Different types of relations
  • Different types of behavior

22
(No Transcript)
23
(No Transcript)
24
(No Transcript)
25
Definition of altruism
  • Altruism is doing something for someone out of
    concern for the others well-being
  • Rational behavior
  • Behavior based on the costs/benefits for the other

26
Empirical test 1
  • Hypothesis
  • The greater the need of the parent, the more
    support the children will give
  • Evidence
  • More support to widowed parents than to married
    parents
  • More support to ill parents than to healthy
    parents

27
Empirical test 2
  • Hypothesis
  • The greater the need of the child, the more
    support the parent will give
  • Research on financial transfers to children
  • Comparisons across children
  • The poorest children do not get more than the
    richest children
  • Equity versus need

28
(3) Norms
  • General expectation of how to act
  • External norm (via sanctions)
  • Internalized norm
  • Norms of filial obligation
  • Feeling that one should care for ones family
  • Unconditional
  • Should not depend on own cost
  • Should not depend on own what they did for you
    (or did not do for you)
  • Norm of reciprocity
  • Feeling that one should return favors

29
(No Transcript)
30
(No Transcript)
31
child
sibling
grandc
parent
niece
grandp
cousin
aunt
32
Empirical test 1
  • Hypothesis
  • The more people adhere to kinship norms, the more
    support they give to their parents
  • Research shows positive relationship for
    individual adult children
  • Macro-level test

33
(No Transcript)
34
Causal direction?
causal effect
Norms of filial obligation
Support to parents
attitude adjustment
35
Alternative test
  • Test of
  • Norm of reciprocity versus rational exchange
  • Focus on consequences of support
  • Perceived quality
  • Consider the following possibilities
  • Ego gives more
  • Balance
  • Ego gives less

36
(No Transcript)
37
(No Transcript)
38
(No Transcript)
39
(No Transcript)
40
(No Transcript)
41
Conclusion
  • Solidarity toward the elderly is perfectly
    compatible with a rational and selfish model of
    man
  • The high levels of family solidarity in southern
    Europe (compared to the western/northern parts of
    Europe) point to higher levels of altruism in the
    south
  • Coresidence of parents and older children is not
    a form of children helping parents it is a
    continuation of parents helping children
  • The lower levels of intergenerational contact
    among the higher educated can be explained by
    weaker norms of filial obligation among the
    higher educated
  • The increase in divorce threatens
    intergenerational solidarity

42
More reading?
  • Review paper (presented to Netspar)
  • http//www.netspar.nl/events/pensiondays/upcoming/
    nov24/
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com