Sarah Cotterill and Liz Richardson - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 17
About This Presentation
Title:

Sarah Cotterill and Liz Richardson

Description:

An Experiment to Encourage Civic Behaviour Among Callers to a Local Authority Contact Centre ... Quid pro quo. Discussion: Changing the Opportunity Structures ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:61
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 18
Provided by: mewx9
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Sarah Cotterill and Liz Richardson


1
Ask me I wont say No How could I? An
Experiment to Encourage Civic Behaviour Among
Callers to a Local Authority Contact Centre
  • Sarah Cotterill and Liz Richardson
  • http//www.ipeg.org.uk/civicbehaviour

2
Overview
  • Background and context
  • Rediscovering the Civic project
  • Research question
  • Design experiments
  • Research design
  • Preliminary findings
  • Discussion

3
Policy context
  • Citizen engagement contributes to
  • Improved public services
  • Cohesive, integrated communities
  • Revive local democracy
  • Well-being and skills
  • Finding solutions to difficult problems
  • (Communities in Control white paper, 2008)
  • Service Transformation
  • Improve capability to respond to citizen needs
  • Joining up services
  • Personalised services (Varney, 2006)

4
Background and context
  • Contact centres emphasis on customer care and
    efficiency. Day to day encounters between front
    line council officers and citizens
  • Frustrating
  • Missed opportunity to listen?
  • Customers or citizens
  • Contrast with public value management
  • Services delivering public value
  • Dialogue with citizens (Lowndes,
    Pratchett, Stoker 2006 Stoker 2006)
  • Councils struggle to involve those outside
    organised groups
    (Cowell 2004, Orr and Mcateer 2004)

5
Rediscovering the Civic and Achieving Better
Outcomes in Public Policy model
Cotterill, Richardson, Stoker, Wales, 2008
6
Defining civic behaviour
7
Institutional Factors
  • Civic behaviour is influenced by external
    sources of support or opposition to behaviour,
    whether physical, financial legal or social
    (Guagano et al. 1995)
  • Behaviour of local authorities will impact on
    citizen behaviour by creating or endangering
    trust and efficacy (Van Vugt et al 2000)
  • Government can enhance/restrict social norms such
    as trust, recipricocity and reputations. By
    taking on collective responsibility, government
    can sometimes reduce individual recipricocity
    (Ostrom 1998)
  • Where rules-in-use welcome engagement, there is
    more political participation (Lowndes, Pratchett,
    Stoker 2006)

8
Institutional Factors
  • Opportunity Structures
  • Volume and variety of opportunities to volunteer,
    join groups, attend meetings, make comments etc
  • Quality of opportunities including the support
    provided, the amount of influence, institutional
    responsiveness
  • b) Institutional rules and practices
  • Nature of the interaction between citizens and
    professionals

9
Research Question
  • Research Aims
  • Change the nature of the interaction between
    service providers and citizens during everyday
    contact
  • Find effective ways of engagement
  • Change the opportunity structure
  • Research Question
  • How can local authorities successfully build on
    customer contact to encourage civic behaviour?

10
Design Experiments
  • Origins in the design sciences new to social
    science
  • An untried approach to an identified problem with
    lack of clarity on how to implement it
  • Defined and measureable objectives
  • Redesign over a number of cycles to perfect
  • A comparison group (preferable)
  • Co-production researchers practitioners work
    as team
  • Importance of detailed recording and reflective
    review
  • Governance group with authority to implement
    change
  • (John and Stoker 2008, forthcoming)

11
Neighbourhood Activity Design Experiment
  • Two stage intervention
  • Contact centre ask for involvement
  • Neighbourhood intervention
  • ½ visited
  • ½ information pack (comparison group)
  • Research
  • Telephone interviews before and after
  • Civic behaviour, attitudes, efficacy, motives
  • Observation
  • Steering Group

12
The Neighbourhood
  • Residential area of a north-west town
  • About 4000 residents, 1400 households
  • 15-19 receive benefits 2005 (national
    14)
  • Ethnicity 57 white 41 Asian (British or
    Pakistani)
  • Within 30 of most deprived areas (IMD)
  • (ONS neighbourhood statistics)
  • Chosen because has an active and welcoming
    community association plus range of other
    activities.

13
Preliminary Findings 1
  • 30 callers say they want to get more involved
  • Overwhelming support for the council
    encouragement
  • Some scepticism about how others will respond
    they are flogging a dead horse
  • Some scepticism about council motives
    Im worried its just
    a token gesture
  • Not the usual suspects
  • 7 white men 7 white women 8 asian men 8 asian
    women
  • More than a third are under 35 years
  • More than two thirds are working
  • 5 who have not undertaken any civic activity in
    past year
  • Motives
  • Primary motives are instrumental make a
    difference to the area (crime, litter, activities
    for children)

14
Preliminary Findings 2
  • Follow up interviews 6-8 weeks later No
    activity yet but 10 of the 30 are still planning
    to get more involved in action to improve the
    neighbourhood
  • The usual suspects?
  • 4 white men 2 white women 4 asian men 0 asian
    women
  • Two thirds are aged 35-44
  • Higher level of civic activity in past 12 months
  • Reasons for not getting more involved
  • Barriers (caring, work, illness, age)
  • I am happy to put my views forward and be
    consulted
  • Want to be listened to and action taken
  • Community organisations not for everyone

15
Discussion Changing Institutional Rules
Practices
  • We changed the institutional rules and practices
    by altering contact centre routines and providing
    neighbourhood support
  • Some success in attracting a range of citizens
  • Local authority concerns about adverse citizen
    reaction
  • Citizen response
  • Generally favourable, some scepticism
  • Worries about the implications of commitment
  • Citizens have a set of conditions before theyll
    respond. Quid pro quo

16
Discussion Changing the Opportunity Structures
  • Initial enthusiasm not translated into action.
    Why?
  • Intention/action gap?
  • Opportunity structure not changed?
  • Opportunities do not reflect the behaviour
    citizens want to do?
  • Next iteration can vary and tailor the
    opportunity structures more e.g.
  • One-off activities
  • Listening/partnership
  • Putting people with similar interests in touch
    with one another

17
Ask me I wont say No How could I? An
Experiment to Encourage Civic Behaviour Among
Callers to a Local Authority Contact Centre
  • Sarah Cotterill and Liz Richardson
  • http//www.ipeg.org.uk/civicbehaviour
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com