Title: Sarah Cotterill and Liz Richardson
1Ask me I wont say No How could I? An
Experiment to Encourage Civic Behaviour Among
Callers to a Local Authority Contact Centre
- Sarah Cotterill and Liz Richardson
- http//www.ipeg.org.uk/civicbehaviour
2Overview
- Background and context
- Rediscovering the Civic project
- Research question
- Design experiments
- Research design
- Preliminary findings
- Discussion
3Policy context
- Citizen engagement contributes to
- Improved public services
- Cohesive, integrated communities
- Revive local democracy
- Well-being and skills
- Finding solutions to difficult problems
- (Communities in Control white paper, 2008)
- Service Transformation
- Improve capability to respond to citizen needs
- Joining up services
- Personalised services (Varney, 2006)
4Background and context
- Contact centres emphasis on customer care and
efficiency. Day to day encounters between front
line council officers and citizens - Frustrating
- Missed opportunity to listen?
- Customers or citizens
- Contrast with public value management
- Services delivering public value
- Dialogue with citizens (Lowndes,
Pratchett, Stoker 2006 Stoker 2006) - Councils struggle to involve those outside
organised groups
(Cowell 2004, Orr and Mcateer 2004)
5Rediscovering the Civic and Achieving Better
Outcomes in Public Policy model
Cotterill, Richardson, Stoker, Wales, 2008
6Defining civic behaviour
7Institutional Factors
- Civic behaviour is influenced by external
sources of support or opposition to behaviour,
whether physical, financial legal or social
(Guagano et al. 1995) - Behaviour of local authorities will impact on
citizen behaviour by creating or endangering
trust and efficacy (Van Vugt et al 2000) - Government can enhance/restrict social norms such
as trust, recipricocity and reputations. By
taking on collective responsibility, government
can sometimes reduce individual recipricocity
(Ostrom 1998) - Where rules-in-use welcome engagement, there is
more political participation (Lowndes, Pratchett,
Stoker 2006)
8Institutional Factors
- Opportunity Structures
- Volume and variety of opportunities to volunteer,
join groups, attend meetings, make comments etc - Quality of opportunities including the support
provided, the amount of influence, institutional
responsiveness - b) Institutional rules and practices
- Nature of the interaction between citizens and
professionals
9Research Question
- Research Aims
- Change the nature of the interaction between
service providers and citizens during everyday
contact - Find effective ways of engagement
- Change the opportunity structure
- Research Question
- How can local authorities successfully build on
customer contact to encourage civic behaviour?
10Design Experiments
- Origins in the design sciences new to social
science - An untried approach to an identified problem with
lack of clarity on how to implement it - Defined and measureable objectives
- Redesign over a number of cycles to perfect
- A comparison group (preferable)
- Co-production researchers practitioners work
as team - Importance of detailed recording and reflective
review - Governance group with authority to implement
change - (John and Stoker 2008, forthcoming)
11Neighbourhood Activity Design Experiment
- Two stage intervention
- Contact centre ask for involvement
- Neighbourhood intervention
- ½ visited
- ½ information pack (comparison group)
- Research
- Telephone interviews before and after
- Civic behaviour, attitudes, efficacy, motives
- Observation
- Steering Group
12The Neighbourhood
- Residential area of a north-west town
- About 4000 residents, 1400 households
- 15-19 receive benefits 2005 (national
14) - Ethnicity 57 white 41 Asian (British or
Pakistani) - Within 30 of most deprived areas (IMD)
- (ONS neighbourhood statistics)
- Chosen because has an active and welcoming
community association plus range of other
activities.
13Preliminary Findings 1
- 30 callers say they want to get more involved
- Overwhelming support for the council
encouragement - Some scepticism about how others will respond
they are flogging a dead horse - Some scepticism about council motives
Im worried its just
a token gesture - Not the usual suspects
- 7 white men 7 white women 8 asian men 8 asian
women - More than a third are under 35 years
- More than two thirds are working
- 5 who have not undertaken any civic activity in
past year - Motives
- Primary motives are instrumental make a
difference to the area (crime, litter, activities
for children)
14Preliminary Findings 2
- Follow up interviews 6-8 weeks later No
activity yet but 10 of the 30 are still planning
to get more involved in action to improve the
neighbourhood - The usual suspects?
- 4 white men 2 white women 4 asian men 0 asian
women - Two thirds are aged 35-44
- Higher level of civic activity in past 12 months
- Reasons for not getting more involved
- Barriers (caring, work, illness, age)
- I am happy to put my views forward and be
consulted - Want to be listened to and action taken
- Community organisations not for everyone
15Discussion Changing Institutional Rules
Practices
- We changed the institutional rules and practices
by altering contact centre routines and providing
neighbourhood support - Some success in attracting a range of citizens
- Local authority concerns about adverse citizen
reaction - Citizen response
- Generally favourable, some scepticism
- Worries about the implications of commitment
- Citizens have a set of conditions before theyll
respond. Quid pro quo
16Discussion Changing the Opportunity Structures
- Initial enthusiasm not translated into action.
Why? - Intention/action gap?
- Opportunity structure not changed?
- Opportunities do not reflect the behaviour
citizens want to do? - Next iteration can vary and tailor the
opportunity structures more e.g. - One-off activities
- Listening/partnership
- Putting people with similar interests in touch
with one another
17Ask me I wont say No How could I? An
Experiment to Encourage Civic Behaviour Among
Callers to a Local Authority Contact Centre
- Sarah Cotterill and Liz Richardson
- http//www.ipeg.org.uk/civicbehaviour