Persistent Resolvable Identifiers in the Online Environment - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 22
About This Presentation
Title:

Persistent Resolvable Identifiers in the Online Environment

Description:

A linguistic element that has the function of identifying. ... identifying component or substance, an identifier' (A. Quinton, Nature of Things) ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:60
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 23
Provided by: matthew72
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Persistent Resolvable Identifiers in the Online Environment


1
Persistent Resolvable Identifiers in the Online
Environment
  • IDEA 2006 Open e-Learning Forum
  • Matthew Walker
  • Director, IT Collection Infrastructure
  • National Library of Australia

2
Outline
  • What is a Persistent Identifier (PI)?
  • Why do we need PIs?
  • Real world examples
  • NLAs role in relation to PIs
  • Meaningful vs. Arbitrary PIs
  • NLAs PI scheme
  • Lessons learned
  • Futures
  • References

3
What is a Persistent Identifier (PI)?
  • Definitions
  • Identifier
  • Linguistics. A linguistic element that has the
    function of identifying. (Oxford English
    Dictionary Online, http//dictionary.oed.com)
  • the identity of things through time is due to
    the presence in them of an identifying component
    or substance, an identifier (A. Quinton, Nature
    of Things)

4
What is a Persistent Identifier (PI)?
  • Definitions
  • Persistent
  • Continuous, continuing to exist enduring,
    lasting chronic. (Oxford English Dictionary
    Online, http//dictionary.oed.com)
  • Persistent Identifier
  • An element that identifies a resource on a
    continuing, enduring basis.
  • Implies that there is a service somewhere that
    allows you to resolve that persistent identifier.

5
What is a Persistent Identifier (PI)?
  • Definitions
  • Persistent Resolvable Identifier
  • An identifier that can be used to refer to an
    item or resource on an ongoing basis, to find
    information about it, and to locate it.

6
Resolvable Persistent Identifier
  • Resolver Service at the NLA

The Web
Web Browser
1. PI request
4. Resource contents
Resolverhttp//nla.gov.au
NLA WebInfrastructure
2. URI or file request
3. Resource contents
Resource
7
Why do we need PIs?
  • To ensure that access to a cited object is
    ongoing.
  • Example policy document on a website moves to
    another folder. Location metadata should be
    updated so that the PI still refers to the
    document in its new location.

8
Why do we need PIs?
  • Persistent association with an item.
  • Digital object
  • Metadata
  • Description
  • Information on how to get the item
  • Other issues
  • Rights restrictions
  • Item no longer exists

9
Real world examples
  • Social Security Numbers Tax File Numbers
  • Yes, assuming that your number doesnt get
    re-used after you die.
  • ISBN
  • Yes, if it is representing a particular
    publication of the book (a manifestation), but
    you cant use it to identify an individual copy
    of a book.

10
Real world examples
  • Street address
  • No these can change.
  • Longitude/latitude combination
  • Depends what object it is supposed to represent
    on an ongoing basis. Yes, if it represents a
    particular point on the globe. No, if it
    pinpoints your house, which may not exist in 100
    years.

11
Real world examples
  • Web domain name
  • No what happens when you forget to renew your
    domain name subscription?
  • Date/time
  • Maybe, if it is used to refer to a particular
    point in time.

12
NLAs role in relation to PIs
  • Need for own collection
  • Participate in development of standards for
    recording PIs
  • Advise other institutions on PIs and digital
    collection management
  • Emerging role of providing resolution services
    for other peoples PIs
  • Handle DOI
  • info URI - registration options
  • Every individual items PI or
  • Rely on central repository to resolve to the
    remote item.
  • Each agency/institution registers.
  • Assumes agency/institution has infrastructure to
    resolve to its own items.

13
Meaningful vs. Arbitrary PIs- Advantages
  • Meaningful PIs
  • Content managers users love the fact that the
    meaning of the PI is intrinsic.(heavily weighted)
  • Arbitrary PIs
  • Allocation of PI is automatic saves content
    managers time.
  • Dont have to maintain PI scheme saves content
    managers time.
  • Dont have to implement changes to the PI scheme
    in underlying technology saves IT time.

14
Meaningful vs. Arbitrary PIs- Disadvantages
  • Meaningful PIs
  • Assignment of the PI has to be done manually by
    the content manager/s takes time introduces
    possibility for error.
  • Have to create/maintain policies for the
    structure of the PIs.
  • What happens if a content manager assigns the
    wrong PI?
  • Arbitrary PIs
  • Content managers and users cant interpret what
    the PI represents without a resolution
    service.(heavily weighted)

15
NLAs PI scheme
  • Meaningful PIs
  • http//nla.gov.au/nla.aus-an3281107
  • http//nla.gov.au/nla.pic-an21621679
  • http//nla.gov.au/nla.ms-ms51
  • http//nla.gov.au/nla.arc-13467

16
NLAs PI scheme
  • PI extensions to identify levels in the hierarchy
    of bibliographic metadata
  • http//nla.gov.au/nla.aus-an3281107-0-s3
  • http//nla.gov.au/nla.pic-an23323328
  • http//nla.gov.au/nla.ms-ms51-1
  • http//nla.gov.au/nla.ms-ms51-1-2
  • http//nla.gov.au/nla.arc-13467-20000911-http//ww
    w.acfonline.org.au/campaigns/international/trade/t
    akeaction.htm

17
NLAs PI scheme
  • Further extensions to identify different
    representations/copies of an item. For example
  • original copy (-o)
  • master copy (-m)
  • http//nla.gov.au/nla.aus-an3281107-0-s3-v
  • http//nla.gov.au/nla.pic-an23323328-t
  • http//nla.gov.au/nla.map-lfsp1958-e
  • http//nla.gov.au/nla.ms-ms9-fa

18
Lessons Learned
  • Dos
  • Allocate PIs for description of the resource and
    its sub-units.
  • Register your PI scheme with InfoURI or use a
    URN.
  • Registration with InfoURI is simpler less
    costly than setting up with URN.
  • Donts
  • If using meaningful PIs, dont develop systems
    that are dependent on the content of the PI for
    ingest and dissemination workflows.
  • need a standard SIP/DIP (METS is our choice)
  • Dont link meaningful PIs directly to file
    system. Need a database to deal with issues such
    as multiple PIs for the same object, best copy,
    access control.

19
Lessons Learned
  • Need a syntax for requesting copies of an object
    with different roles (e.g. thumbnail, contextual
    display, structural map).
  • We encoded this in the PI but a protocol would be
    better
  • Example
  • see this catalogue record with stacks of URIs
    http//nla.gov.au/anbd.bib-an40416514

20
Futures
  • PI solution for whole domain web archive.
  • PIs for metadata.
  • PIs for entities authority records, people,
    places, topics.
  • PIs for works, expressions, manifestations, items
    as defined by FRBR standard.
  • Handle or DOI?

21
References
  • A practical approach to ensuring the persistence
    of digital collections at the National Library of
    Australia, Tony Boston Ninh Nguyenhttp//www.nl
    a.gov.au/nla/staffpaper/2002/boston2.html
  • Persistence is a Virtue, Diana Dackhttp//www.nla
    .gov.au/nla/staffpaper/2001/dack.html
  • What is FRBR?, Barbara Tilletthttp//www.loc.gov/
    cds/downloads/FRBR.PDF
  • info URIhttp//info-uri.info/registry/docs/misc
    /faq.html

22
References
  • METShttp//www.loc.gov/standards/mets/METSOvervie
    w.v2.html
  • RDAhttp//www.collectionscanada.ca/jsc/rdaprospec
    tus.html
  • PURLhttp//purl.org/
  • DOIhttp//www.doi.org/
  • OAIS (SIP/AIP/DIP)http//public.ccsds.org/publica
    tions/archive/650x0b1.pdf
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com