Quitter la tour divoire Stepping Out of the Ivory Tower - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 35
About This Presentation
Title:

Quitter la tour divoire Stepping Out of the Ivory Tower

Description:

www.uottawa.ca. Quitter la tour d'ivoire. Stepping Out. of the Ivory Tower ... D'une perspective instituionnelle, l'Universit est une trinit (James Downey, 2003) ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:45
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 36
Provided by: gilles1
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Quitter la tour divoire Stepping Out of the Ivory Tower


1
Quitter la tour divoireStepping Outof the
Ivory Tower
  • Le 19 novembre 2003 - November 19, 2003

2
Plan - Outline
  • Introduction
  • Université à lécoute
  • Cadre dimputabilité
  • Accent sur une formation générale - humanités et
    sciences sociales
  • Conclusions
  • Introduction
  • Responsive university
  • Accountability framework
  • A focus on liberal arts
  • Conclusions

3
Introduction
4
The Institution what is it?
  • From an institutional perspective the University
    is a trinity (James Downey, 2003)
  • Corporation
  • Collegium
  • Community
  • Dune perspective instituionnelle, lUniversité
    est une trinité (James Downey, 2003)
  • Corporation
  • Collège
  • Communauté

5
Corporation
  • Legal corporate entity
  • Appoint officers
  • Own property
  • Enter into contracts, etc.
  • Autonomous institution

6
Collegium
  • Structures that empower the faculty to control
    and conduct the academic affairs
  • Programs
  • Admission
  • Academic regulations and standards,
  • Etc.

7
Communauté
  • Infrastructures
  • Immeubles
  • Infrastructures de communications
  • Infrastructures de transport
  • Services
  • Ressources humaines
  • Professionnels
  • Sociaux et culturels
  • Formation professionnelle

8
The Institution what does it do?
  • Major functions of the university
  • Learning
  • Discovery
  • Engagement

9
The University Framework
  • What we are
  • Corporation
  • Collegium
  • Community
  • What we do
  • Learning
  • Discovery
  • Engagement

Need to be responsive
10
The Responsive University
  • To survive and thrive, colleges and universities
    will have to be responsive.
  • Responsiveness is in the eyes of those being
    served
  • Students
  • Faculty
  • Parents
  • Governments
  • Businesses
  • Non-profit organizations.
  • Each of these publics will judge the university
    in terms of
  • the quality of their relationships with the
    university, and
  • the quality of the outcomes of those
    relationships.

11
Role of Universities
  • Universities have to pursue several missions at
    the same time
  • to train students to work effectively in an
    increasingly competitive international economy
  • to train more socially-responsible participants
    for national and global citizenship and
  • to equip individuals for success in our nation's
    complex workplace

12
Corporatization of Universities
13
Knowledge Society and Universities
  • Current social developments point to a move
    towards knowledge society
  • Powered by a knowledge-based economy
  • Universities are perceived as central elements to
    this KBE (e.g., innovation agenda and
    commercialization agenda)
  • Is this threatening the autonomy and role of
    universities?

14
A More Business-Like Approach
  • Some of the positive elements
  • Corporate governance
  • Risk management
  • Operational risks
  • Enterprise risks
  • Performance review
  • Revenue diversification
  • Value for money

15
Towards a Corporate Model
Collegium
Corporate
  • Undergraduate education ? research
  • Curiosity-driven research ? commercialization
  • Primarily govern. funding ? multi-source
    directed
    funding

16
  • Are universities being responsive to one public
    (business/government) at the expense of another
    (students) ?
  • There is a risk need to work with our
    stakeholders to ensure that we meet the
    expectations of our publics

17
University Experience
  • Are we neglecting one of the key missions of
    universities? Teaching.
  • We have an obligation to provide our students
    with a quality university experience

18
Who is doing the teaching?
  • J. Simpson (Nov. 12, 2003 Globe and Mail)
    research monies pouring into the universities
    may have induced some professors to reduce their
    teaching time, to buy their way out of teaching
    to concentrate more on research.
  • Young faculty members are shying away from
    teaching as they enter the profession ? Why
    would anyone not want this job, there is no
    teaching.
  • ? Faculty member protected from teaching!
  • Administrative responsibilities and research
    efforts are pulling a large fraction of faculty
    members away from teaching.

19
Why is this ?
  • Perception that teaching is not equally valued as
    research
  • Perception that the reward system is focused
    solely on research (tenure/promotion)
  • Perception of a corporate university with a
    focus on commercialization of research
  • Central role in a KBS/KBE requires that we place
    as much emphasis on teaching as we do on research
  • we need to focus on the quality of the
    undergraduate experience, i.e., the quality of
    teaching

20
How did we get there?
  • While education is part of the social agenda of
    governments
  • ? it is not clear if education is meant to
    include post-secondary education ? it is not
    top of mind for Ontarians
  • Roger Martins report (1) indicates clearly the
    positive correlation between productivity and
    level of education attainment
  • Roger Martin (2003). Missing Opportuniyies
    Ontarios urban propserity gap

21
Ontarians Place Less Value on University
Education than Peers
If you had to give advice to a young person about
the level of education they should have , which
one of the following would you advise them to
achieve?
The Institute for Competitiveness and Prosperity,
Working Paper No. 4, Sept. 2003 Striking
similarities Attitudes and Ontarios prosperity
gap
22
Returns of Education
The Institute for Competitiveness and Prosperity,
Working Paper No. 3, June 2003 Missing
Opportunities Ontarios Urban Prosperity Gap
23
Ontario Provincial Funding for University
Education
Per FTE
Per Capita
COU, 2003
24
How did we get there ?
  • Only additional source of new funding in recent
    years was driven solely by growth in UG
    enrolment
  • No inflationary budget adjustments
  • Student Faculty ratio (based on FT-UG students)
  • 161 in 1996
  • 231 in 2003
  • Quality Assurance Fund introduced in 2003-04

25
Money Gap Left by the Government
  • Some have even gone so far as to state
  • There is a need for universities to build an
    independent pool of capital private funding
    will have to support 5 to 10 of operating
    budget Bill Brock, former TB deputy chairman
    Globe and Mail Nov. 16, 2003 Gordon Pitts

26
Éléments de solutionsSome ideas
27
Tiering of University Funding
  • As a research intensive university with an
    important fraction of expensive professional
    programs ? highly disadvantaged
  • e.g., cost of training an MD students varies
    between 80K-100K per student per year ? current
    grant is 22K per year per student.
  • Funding model should reflect the different
    missions of universitiesa) primarily
    undergraduate b) undergrad/graduate c)
    medical/doctoral universities

28
Accountability Framework
  • While we are autonomous corporate institutions
  • Academic freedom and autonomy ? accountability

29
Performance-Based Funding
  • A component of our funding should be based on
    performance and quality indicators
  • Indicators should be
  • measurable,
  • verifiable, and
  • directly related to the quality of the university
    experience (undergraduate and graduate)
  • Categories as opposed to ranking

30
Return to Basics
31
Role of Universities in Building a Civil Society
  • The primary mission of a university is not to
    train but to educate, not to do research or
    transfer technology, not to prepare students for
    jobs but to make them more discerning people,
    capable of seeing through the political and
    commercial huckterisms of their times, of
    establishing their own values and finding their
    own meaning in life, of constructing and
    expressing their own compelling
    narratives.James Downey, 2003

32
Liberal Arts/Science Education
  • A liberal arts/science education is at the basis
    of a university education
  • cultivate intellectual creativity, autonomy,
    and resilience critical thinking a combination
    of intellectual breath and specialized knowledge
    the comprehension and tolerance of diverse ideas
    and experiences informed participation in
    community life and effective communications
    skills.Paull Axelrod, 2002

33
Liberal Arts and Sciences Basis
  • All professional programsmedicine ? law
    ?education ?engineeringbusinesshealth
    sciences
  • should be 2nd entry programs, i.e, students
    should be required to have a strong liberal
    arts/science/humanities (multidisciplinary)
    degree

34
Conclusions
35
Conclusions
  • Need to re-focus on the university experience of
    our students
  • Revisit the funding models of universities
  • Introduce measures of accountability in funding
  • Focus on liberal arts and science

Mettre laccent sur lexpérience universitaire
des étudiants Nouveaux modèles de
financement Introduire un cadre dimputabilité
dans le financement Promouvoir les avantages
dune formation générale arts sciences
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com