Title: Observations of Microwave Brightness Temperature Contamination: A Global Perspective
1Observations of Microwave Brightness Temperature
ContaminationA Global Perspective
- January 7, 2005
- David Kunkee
2Outline
- C-band Missions SMMR, AMSR-E
- X-band Missions SMMR, TMI, AMSR-E
- RFI
- Europe
- North America
- Far East
- Oceans
- Summary
3C-Band Measurements
- Scanning Multichannel Microwave Radiometer
- Joint project involving Goddard Space Flight
Center (GSFC) and Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL) - Launched October 1978 Nimbus 7
- 6 GHz Channel 6.6 GHz and 250 MHz RF BW DSB
- 10 GHz Channel 10.69 GHz and 250 MHz RF BW DSB
- TB Data was reprocessed to improve calibration
after the mission terminated - Data for this study was obtained from the
National Snow and Ice Data Center (NSIDC) - Advanced Microwave Scanning Radiometer (AMSR) - E
- Built by Mitsubishi for NASDA (JAXA)
- Launched May 2002 NASA EOS Aqua
- 6 GHz Channel 6.9 GHz and 350 MHz BW
- 10 GHz Channel 10.65 GHz and 100 MHz BW
4SMMR Characteristics
From http//nsidc.org/data/docs/daac/nsidc0036_smm
r_pathfinder_tbs.gd.html
5Europe at 6 GHz
SMMR
6.6 GHz
AMSR-E
6.9 GHz
2003
1979
2004
1987
66 GHz Over Europe
- SMMR Data over Europe
- Large area of saturation centered over Berlin
area - Likely originated from tropo-scatter system(s)
that are no longer in operation - Radio link between W. Germany and Berlin
- SMMR Data over North Atlantic (not shown)
- Investigators noted anomalies in SST retrievals
over the North Atlantic using AMSR data - Up to gt20 K perturbations in SST
- Attributed to RFI not seen in AMSR data
- AMSR Data over Europe
- Several smaller areas of saturation appear
- Appear as point sources affecting a smaller
region - Contamination appears in several locations over
mainland Europe but not in the area of Berlin
7North America at 6 GHz
SMMR
6.6 GHz
AMSR-E
6.9 GHz
2003
1979
2004
1987
8Far East at 6 GHz
SMMR
6.6 GHz
AMSR-E
6.9 GHz
2003
1979
2004
1987
9Far East at 6 GHz
- SMMR Data
- Indicates a region of saturated Brightness
temperature near Vladivostok - Japan is relatively interference free
- AMSR Data
- No interference near Vladivostok
- Several prominent areas of brightness temperature
contamination over Japan - Notes on 6 GHz Overall
- Many differences in interference regions could be
attributable to different observation frequencies
of SMMR and AMSR - Does not explain differences between SMMR-AMSR
data over North America - Development of radio service occurred between
1987 and 2002 - 6.4 7.1 GHz Region allocated to Fixed Service
(FS) and Mobile Service (MS)
10X-Band Measurements
- Scanning Multichannel Microwave Radiometer (SMMR)
- GSFC and JPL
- Launched October 1978 Nimbus 7
- 10 GHz Channel 10.69 GHz and 250 MHz RF BW DSB
- Tropical Rainfall Measuring Mission (TRMM)
Microwave Imager (TMI) - Built by Hughes Space and Communications (Now
Boeing Satellite Systems) - Launched November 1997 from Tanaga-shima Japan
into a 35 incl. orbit - 10 GHz Channel 10.65 and 100 MHz BW
- Advanced Microwave Scanning Radiometer (AMSR) - E
- Built by Mitsubishi for NASDA (Now JAXA)
- Launched May 2002 NASA EOS Aqua
- 10 GHz Channel 10.65 GHz and 100 MHz BW
11Europe at 10 GHz
SMMR
10.69 GHz
AMSR-E
10.65 GHz
2003
1979
2004
1987
1210 GHz over Europe
- SMMR Data
- No apparent RFI
- AMSR Data
- Several points of contamination over UK and Italy
- A few additional isolated points over other
countries - RFI at 10 GHz in Europe was not seen by TMI
before AMSR-E operation - TMI Orbit limited to 35 latitude
- AMSR and TMI passbands are the same 10.6 10.7
- Notes
- A radio service was apparently implemented in UK
and Italy between 1987 and 2002 but not in France
or Germany - 10 GHz RFI over UK and Italy appears to be more
severe than 6 GHz RFI - Even with EESS allocation at 10 GHz and no
Allocation at 6 GHz
13North America at 10 GHz
SMMR
10.69 GHz
AMSR-E
10.65 GHz
2003
1979
2004
1987
14Far East at 10 GHz
SMMR
10.69 GHz
AMSR-E
10.65 GHz
2003
1979
2004
1987
15Observations of RFI from TMI (10.65 V)
1998
RF interference with TMI for first several months
of operation. Black circles are to enhance the
visibility of the interference and do not
represent the actual extent of the interference.
16 6 GHz RFI Over Ocean SMMR
Several regions were found where retrieved
SST standard deviation exceeded 15 C
1710 GHz RFI Over Ocean WindSAT
Geostationary Broadcast Satellite believed to be
operating near 10.71 GHz
- WindSat
- Built by the US Naval
- Research Laboratory
- Launched 06-Jan-2003
- 10 GHz Channel
- 10.55 to 10.8 GHz
The location and amplitude of RFI depends on
viewing geometry Impacts Sea Surface Winds
Sea Surface Temperature
Courtesy RSS Inc.
18Summary of Initial Observations
- SMMR and AMSR data show different regions of RFI
- Areas of contamination have changed over time
- 1987 Germany and Vladivostok
- 2003 UK, Italy, USA and Japan
- Monotonic increase in use of the radio spectrum
is not necessarily the case for all parts of the
spectrum - Utilization of radio services and the services
themselves change over time - Some services may be phased out or replaced by
different technology - New radio services may be built and put into
widespread service quickly - Some differences may be explained by sensor
characteristics - SMMR and AMSR 6 and 10 GHz passbands are slightly
different - May explain some differences observed for
isolated points of RFI - Not likely to explain differences in areas
showing general contamination such as NA at 6 GHz
and UK and Italy at 10 GHz - Frequency allocations are generally consistent
across the range of observing frequencies of each
sensor for each band
19Perspective
- Vulnerability of EESS Passive Users is
Illustrated By C-band History - What appears to be open spectrum can undergo
widespread changes - In contrast to the RF environment at 6-GHz, a
better situation exists near 10.6 GHz for EESS.
However - EESS Allocation at 10.6 10.68 is shared with
other services - Frequency management has apparently kept this
spectrum clear for EESS in N/A - Observations at X-band over Europe suggest the
impacts of frequency management on a per
country basis. - EESS should strive to obtain good neighbors
- Frequency managers need to be aware of special
needs of passive users - EESS users and scientists need to be aware of
radio services operating in areas that may affect
their measurements - 10 GHz Illustrates the impact of Frequency
Management - EESS Operation in L- C- and X-band Poses
Challenges ahead - 3 Major EESS Missions are currently planned for
L-band (1.400 1.427)
20Sources of RFI Are Very Different Each Band
- L-band
- Highly utilized area of the spectrum
- Protected band
- RFI to EESS due to spurious and out-of-band
emissions, possibly including harmonics from many
legally operating emitters - radars, communications links, harmonics from UHF
TV - Some RFI may be very hard to track down passive
inter-modulation - C-band
- Highly utilized area of spectrum
- No EESS allocation
- RFI due to continuously operating
communications/data links over land - Easy to find the sources of RFI there are just
too many of them - X-band
- Highly utilized area of the spectrum
- RFI Highly variable globally over land
21What is Next?
22What is Next?
- Ultrawideband
- Approved for use from 3.1 to 10.6 GHz
- Standards controversy use the entire spectrum or
a portion - Applications expected to increase rapidly in the
coming years - 24 GHz Short Range Radar
- Collision avoidance
- May become also become widespread and ubiquitous
23 24Observations of RFI from TMI (10.65 H)
1997
RF interference with TMI for first several months
of operation. Black circles are to enhance the
visibility of the interference and do not
represent the actual extent of the interference.
25(No Transcript)
26(No Transcript)
27(No Transcript)
28EMI produces very high measurements at 19 GHz for
both polarizations
29Anomalous polarization difference at 19 GHz
identifies EMI at 19 GHz between Julian day
204 and 238
30Anomalous frequency difference between 19 and 22
GHz identifies EMI at 22 GHz between Julian
days 236-238.