Colocated Validation Data - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 9
About This Presentation
Title:

Colocated Validation Data

Description:

21-channel limb-scanning infrared radiometer, which includes window channels for ... Microwave emission limb-radiometer/spectrometer. Cirrus Ice content. COMPARE: ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:56
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 10
Provided by: hur47
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Colocated Validation Data


1
Co-located Validation Data
  • TES/HIRDLS Comparison for Reduced Resolution Mode

2
The Satellites
3
  • High Resolution Dynamics Limb Sounder (HIRDLS)
  • 21-channel limb-scanning infrared radiometer,
    which includes window channels for aerosol/cloud
    detection
  • Cloud Top Height is an operational product
    (pointing error, operational HIRDLS altitudes are
    accepted to be higher by 1.7 km than intended)
  • Soon extinction information to be retrieved
  • Tropospheric Emission Sounder (TES)
  • Infrared-imaging, limb and nadir sounding
    Fourier Transform Spectrometer which measures
    spectra between 650 - 3050 cm-1 at a resolution
    of
  • 0.02 cm-1 for altitudes between 0 33 km.
  • Operationally reports Cloud Top Height,
    frequency-dependent Cloud Optical Depth and
    Average Effective Cloud Optical Thickness (nadir
    measurements)
  • Ozone Monitoring Instrument (OMI)
  • UV and visible hyperspectral imager
  • Cloud Scattering Layer Pressure
  • Microwave Limb Sounder (MLS)
  • Microwave emission limb-radiometer/spectrometer
  • Cirrus Ice content

4
Statistical comparisons ONLY
5
Cloud Frequency 2 May 2006
6
Cloud Top Height 2 May 2006
7
Cloud Top Height 2 May 2006
8
Cloud Extinction Coefficient 2 May 2006
9
Conclusions
  • Qualitatively
  • MIPAS retrieved cloud products of cloud top
    height and cloud extinction coefficient compare
    well with HIRDLS cloud top height and TES cloud
    top height and cloud optical depth.
  • HIRDLS shows the highest cloud tops and TES the
    lowest, but taking into account the known 1.7 km
    pointing error associated with HIRDLS and the
    fact that TES cloud products are from it's
    nadir-viewing measurements, the cloud top heights
    reported by all three instruments agree quite
    well.
  • MIPAS and TES report a near-global coverage of
    extinction coefficient of 10-2 km-1 but TES
    exhibits more structure globally than does MIPAS.
  • All instruments show the same global
    distribution, with increased
  • probability of finding cloud in the tropics and
    less at the poles. However, MIPAS notes far less
    cloud detected than do the other two instruments.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com