draft-pentland-dna-protocol3-00.txt - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

draft-pentland-dna-protocol3-00.txt

Description:

In general, all prefixes included in RAs. New option for learned prefixes ... Unsolicited RAs MAY carry a subset of prefixes but MUST include the LinkID prefix ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:47
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 11
Provided by: bret96
Learn more at: https://www.ietf.org
Category:
Tags: dna | draft | pentland | protocol3 | ras | txt

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: draft-pentland-dna-protocol3-00.txt


1
draft-pentland-dna-protocol3-00.txt
  • Brett Pentland

2
Agenda
  • Document description
  • Open Issues
  • Consensus call

3
Background
  • Based on two prior proposals
  • draft-pentland-dna-protocol-01.txt
  • draft-jinchoi-dna-protocol2-01.txt
  • Only one fast RA scheme
  • Link Identification schemes merged

4
Fast RA
  • Taken directly from draft-pentland-dna-protocol-01
    .txt

Token A
Token B
Token C
Access Routers
RS
Token S
Host
Say that B XOR S lt A XOR S lt C XOR S
  • B sends an RA immediately
  • A sends an RA after 20 ms
  • C sends an RA after 40 ms

5
Link Identification
  • Routers listen for all prefixes on a link
  • In general, all prefixes included in RAs
  • New option for learned prefixes
  • One noted as LinkID prefix
  • MUST be included in RAs
  • Hosts SHOULD include a landmark in RSs
  • If the landmark is on the link, routers may send
    an abbreviated RA containing only the landmark
  • If the landmark is not on the link or theres no
    landmark routers send a Complete RA
  • Unsolicited RAs MAY carry a subset of prefixes
    but MUST include the LinkID prefix

6
Link Identification
B A
A B
D
C
D
C
ARs
RA(C)
RA(D)
RS(A?)
APs
RS(A?)
Host
7
Open Issues
  • Identification based on non-prefix information
  • No supporting emails on mailing list
  • Explicit link identifiers
  • Some other discussion suggests there is interest
  • TSLLAO
  • Needed for unicast RS/RA w/o NS/NA
  • Where does this belong?
  • Delivery of MLD packets during DNA?
  • presentation to follow

8
Open issues (cont)
  • Packet delivery to/from node during DNA i.e.
    between the RS and RA
  • What should hosts do with queued packets?
  • Do we need separate Y/N flags for the Landmark
    Option?
  • Probably not.

9
Possible LPO format
0 1 2
3 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3
4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
-------------------------
------- Type Length
LP Reserved Prefix Len 1
-------------------------
------- ... Prefix Len
N Padding
-------------------------
-------




Prefix 1




--------------------
------------




Prefix 2




---------------
----------------- ...
-------------------------
-------




Prefix N




--------------------
------------
  • Use a flag to mark the first prefix as the LinkID
  • Use a further flag to mark it as not a prefix
  • Need host processing rules

10
Where to now?
  • Is this close enough to the mark to accept as a
    WG draft?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com