KOPIO Beam Catcher - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

KOPIO Beam Catcher

Description:

Veto detectors surrounding Decay Region. Particles can escape ... red: e /e-, blue: photon. Example of. g event (MC) Plan view. Coincidence. May 26-27, 2005 ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:40
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 16
Provided by: tadashi
Category:
Tags: kopio | beam | catcher | rede

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: KOPIO Beam Catcher


1
KOPIO Beam Catcher
  • Tadashi Nomura
  • (Kyoto U.)
  • Contents
  • What is Beam Catcher?
  • Concept and Design
  • Expected Performance
  • Proof of Principle
  • Summary

2
Task
  • K?pnn experiment needs hermetic veto system

Signature 2g nothing
Veto detectors surrounding Decay Region
Particles can escape through the beam hole
  • Charged particles
  • Can be swept out from the beam and detected
    outside
  • Photons
  • Must be detected inside the beam
  • Need in-beam photon detector
  • Beam Catcher

3
Challenge
  • In-beam environment
  • High intense beam(necessary to observe gt100
    K?pnn Br10-11)
  • A vast amount of neutrons (30G/spill in KOPIO)
  • Produce protons, pions, (g and e/e-) in the
    detector
  • Most KLs survive after decay region (300M/spill)
  • Decay into p, g ,e/e- in the detector
  • ? These secondary particles fire the counter
    and disturb its primary function !!

Spill length 5 sec
4
Solution
  • Utilize Cherenkov radiation Aerogel tile
    (n1.05) or Acrylic slab radiator
  • Avoid detection of slow particles from neutron
    interactions Slow p, p and other hadrons cannot
    emit lights.
  • Use direction information Segment the detector
    into many modules and require coincidence
    along the beam direction
  • Catch forward photons only Reduce fake signal
    due to g from secondary p0 (neutron interaction
    and KL decay in the detector)

5
Aerogel Catcher in Beam
  • Converter (Lead) Radiator (Aerogel tile)
  • Sensitive area of 30cm x 30cm
  • Like Sandwich detector by modules array

6
Guard Counter in Halo Region
  • Converter (Lead) Radiator (Acrylic slab)
  • Sensitive area of 15cm x 15cm
  • Sandwich detector
  • Total reflection condition in light
    transportationcan reduce neutrons signal
  • e/e- emit large angle Cherenkov lights ? meet
    the total reflection condition
  • Slow particles cannot emit light or generate
    only small angle emission which escape to
    outside of the slab

Photon
Neutron
7
KOPIO Catcher System
  • In-beam Aerogel Catcher
  • Module size 30cm x 30cm
  • Pb converter 2mm per layer
  • Number of modules 420
  • 12-21 in horizontal with beam divergence
  • 25 layers along beam(8.3 X0 in total)
  • Z gap between layers 35cm
  • Halo Guard counter
  • Just before Aerogel Catcher
  • ( 2mm Pb 10mm Acrylic ) x 8 layers x 3
    modules

8
Location of Catcher System
Beam Catcher
Decay Region
9
Expected Performance by MC (1)
Aerogel Catcher Efficiency
Y position dependence
99 _at_ 300MeV
Beam core
10
Expected Performance by MC (2)
Hit probability for Neutrons
Hit probability for KLs
Dominated by decays in the Catcher
0.3 _at_ 800MeV
11
Signal Loss due to Catcher False Hit
  • Accidental hit due to neutrons may kill K?pnn
    signal
  • Total false hit probability was found 0.4
    events / m-bunch
  • Integrated over the duration consistent with
    the arrival time of g from our signal KL
  • If we set the time window to be 3ns,signal loss
    due to false hit will be 4.6
  • Calculation based on random effect
  • Detailed studies by MC under way

Apply timing cut
12
Efficiency Loss due to Blindness
  • Catcher may be blinded due to other activities
  • Blinded modules become less efficient for photons
  • Photon efficiency loss found to be 1.1 (prompt g
    neutrons)
  • Double pulse resolution is quite important
    !! (We used 3ns in the calculation above)

13
Proof of Principle
PT2
PT1
  • Prototype 1 (2001-2)
  • 1/4 size, flat mirror
  • light yield
  • Prototype 2 (2002-3)
  • 1/4 size, parabolic mirror
  • light yield
  • response to proton (as substitute for neutron)
  • Check single layer eff. / two-layers
    coincidence
  • Good agreement with MC(with gas scintillation)

14
Summary (1)
  • In-beam Photon Veto in KOPIO Beam Catcher
    System
  • Aerogel counter inside beam
  • Acrylic sandwich counter in halo region
  • Expected performance meets our requirement
  • High efficiency for photons (gt99 _at_ 300MeV)
  • Low fake hit probability due to neutrons (0.3 _at_
    Ekin800MeV)
  • Signal loss due to false hit will be 5
  • Catcher efficiency loss due to blindness 1

15
Summary (2)
  • Proof-of-Principle experiments have been done
  • two generations of prototype
  • MC is found reliable
  • We are ready for production !!

Full size prototype now under construction
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com