Title: New RussianAmerican Nuclear Deal
1(No Transcript)
2New Russian-American Nuclear Deal and Russian
Arms Control and Non-Proliferation Policy
Presentation by Prof. Alexander
NIKITIN (Russia)
3Russia and America negotiate Until December 2009
Treaty on cuts in deployed nuclear wrhds to
less than 1500 Strategic, tactical,
all? Deployed? Reserves? Warheads? Carriers?
4Obama Medvedev Summit July 2009. Possibility
for Two steps solution Simple ceilings
agreement till December 2009. Big Treaty later.
5(No Transcript)
6(No Transcript)
7Rejkiavik Plan of Nuclear Zero in 10 years
8NO SDI
1986 REJKIAVIK
50 cuts in 5 years 100 cuts in 10 years
9RUSSIA UKRAINE BELARUS KAZAKHSTAN
Tactical Nukes Ukraine- 2345 Georgia-
320 Armenia- 200 Azerbaijan- 75 Lithuania- 325...
Counter-proliferation initiatives in 1991
10RUSSIA UKRAINE BELARUS KAZAKHSTAN
4 1
Counter-proliferation actions 1992-1995
11Russian "Nuclear Triad" in the beginning of
the 2000-2010 decade
LAND ICBMs 756 carriers / 3540 warheads
SEA SLBMs 348 carriers / 1576 warheads
AIR Strategic bombers 69 carriers/ 790 units
12Russian "Nuclear Triad" estimated for the end of
the 2000-2010 decade
LAND ICBMs 230 carriers / 690 warheads
SEA SLBMs 72 SUBMARINES/ 448168 warheads
AIR Strategic bombers 1010 carriers/ 120120
units
13Russian "Nuclear Triad" estimated AFTER the end
of the 2000-2010 decade
All-in-all not more than 400 strategic carriers
All-in-all between 1000 and 1500 strategic
warheads
14Crisis of Nuclear Disarmament
ABM
CTBT
SORT
START-2
START-1
INF ?
15INF at risk Sub-strategic missiles with range
500 5500 km This range is strategic for the
Middle East
16Intermediate and short range Missiles Elimination
Treaty
17INF 1987
Eliminated 2,692 missiles 4,000 warheads
USSR - 1,846
USA - 846
18Inspections 1988-2001
20,000 experts
1,116 inspections USA - 774 Russia -
442
19Russian Deputy Prime Minister Ivanov in
2007 INF Treaty is a Cold War Relict
20Chief of General Staff Baluevsky Time to quit
from the Treaty
21MFA Lavrov Nothing is decided yet
22Defense budgets
Great Britain 59 bln.
France 53 bln.
Germany 39 bln.
Russia 34 bln.
Italy 32 bln
23Defense budgets
USA
480
34
Russia
24Defense budgets CSTO
Russia
34
1,2
0,9
0,052
KAZ
UZB
TAJ
25Joint Defense Spending of the CSTO 38- 42 bln.
USD
CSTO
26Joint Defense Budget of NATO states 800-900 bln.
NATO summit
27In absence of conventional capabilities
parity Russia adds value to operationalizing its
nuclear arsenal, though all NPT policies remain
at place
28Potential parameters of New Russian-Western
deal Cut to lower than 1000 deployed strategic
warheads on 300-400 carriers for each side,
then involve smaller nuclear powers in
negotiations
29- Potential parameters of
- New Russian-Western deal
- Slowly and in stages destroy
- reserves of
- decommissioned strategic
- warheads
30- Potential parameters of
- New Russian-Western deal
- No nukes
- deployed outside national
- territory
- (Remove about 250 US residual nukes
- from Europe, Russia in response
- may move all tactical nukes
- behind Ural to Asia)
31- Potential parameters of
- New Russian-Western deal
- Achieve Zero in production
- of new fissile materials
- (negotiate and conclude
- Fissile Materials Cut-Off Treaty)
32- Potential parameters of
- New Russian-Western deal
- Destroy all
- nuclear weapon-grade quality
- fissile materials
- outside military complex
33Potential parameters of New Russian-Western deal
Keep Zero of short and medium range Nuclear
missiles (dont break INF!) Proposal to make it
Global Zero of INF, as USA and Russia jointly
proposed, doesnt suit Israel
34Potential parameters of New Russian-Western deal
No nuclear tests (US Congress may ratify
CTBT at last)
35Nuclear tests before 1996 up to 170 per year
in certain years
36- Potential parameters of
- New Russian-Western deal
- Keep proliferation at Zero
- Make sure that
- no new countries
- develop military nuclear programs
- and enter Nuclear Club.
37Problems with New Russian-Western deal
Political pre-conditions From Russia USA
should stop BMD plans for Europe From USA
Russia should cooperate more on Iranian issue
38Problems with New Russian-Western deal Methods
of counting carriers and warheads Russia
MIRVed missile counted as 3-10 USA MIRVed
missile counted as 1
39Problems with New Russian-Western deal Methods
of counting Nuclear and non-nuclear
missiles Russia Any nuclear-capable missile
must be counted as nuclear USA Missile which
has conventional warhead right now is not
counted as nuclear
40Problems with New Russian-Western deal Until
BMD in Europe is not canceled, Russia is afraid
of deeper cuts, as far as USA can destroy quite
many Russian missiles in first strike and block
by BMD retaliatory strike
41Hot Issue A B M
42A B M in Europe as an obctacle to US-Rus deal
43Obering IRAN will not get ICBMs before
2015 2007 14 interceptors in Alaska2 in
California 2009 21 in Alaska 2011 40 in Alaska
10 interceptors in Europe between 2011-2013
44Chief of Russian General Staff BALUEVSKY Genuine
hidden reason for ABM in Europe interception
not of Iranian, but of Russian and Chinese
missiles
45Russian "Nuclear Triad" estimated for the end of
the 2000-2010 decade
All-in-all not more than 400 strategic carriers
All-in-all up to 1600 strategic warheads
46Bulgaria, Greece, east of Romania and Turkey are
out of the coverage by American ABM shield NATO
Sec Gen NATO may cover these four
countries with additional NATO ABM system (?!!)
47- President MEDVEDEV
- (In Address to Federal Assembly)
- Well stop planned
- decommissioning
- of three regiments
- of SS-18 strategic missiles
48President MEDVEDEV 2. Well place ISKANDER type
operational-tactical complexes in Kaliningrad and
target them onto Western missiles in Poland (200
km from targets)
49President MEDVEDEV 3.Well start
from Kaliningrad area electronic jamming of Czech
radar and other ABM components
50Lt General Khvorov (Chief Commander of Russian
Strategic Air Force) Russian pilots are able
to jam electronically, or physically
destroy American radars
51Lt General Deinekin (former Chief Commander of
Russian Strategic Air Force) ISKANDERs even not
much needed we may use high-precision Air-based
cruise missiles (X-55) with conventional
warheads for destroying components in Poland
52Lt General Deinekin X-55 is a Soviet analogy to
the US Tomahawk missiles are not seeable by
radars during all trajectory. (Altitude 20-100
meters)
53Lt General Deinekin X-55 Could be launched
from over mainland Russian territory - Range is
4,5 thousand km (reach any site in Europe Or in
the Middle East, Kaliningad basing not important)
54Lt General Deinekin (former Chief Commander of
Russian Strategic Air Force) X-55 precision
allows us, if required, to target and hit even a
mobile phone
55GRYZLOV (Chairman of the Parliament) Russia
will not deploy missiles in Kaliningrad until US
will start deploy their missiles in Poland
56OBAMA USA will not deploy BMD in Europe until
successful tests will prove its effectiveness
57Deputy MFA of Russia Grushko Earlier Moscow
suggested Joint Russia-NATO Theater ABM
system, which was supposed to be able to cover
joint Russian-NATO Peace-keeping force in course
of any potential joint Peace support operation
58S-300, S-400 missile defense
59Problems with New Russian-Western deal Russia
is not yet sure what is the US new policy
towards Iran, India, Pakistan and Middle East
60Russian and US positions on Iran and North
Korea become closer. In spite of
Akhmadinejads recent visit to Russia Moscows
role as a mediator may melt
61Nuclear-Free Middle East is a clear Russian
preference but breaking lower than a 1000
warheads ceiling is not yet a guarantee
of involvement of other nuclear states (including
India, Pakistan and Israel) into nuclear
disarmament talks.
62New beginning in US-Russian nuclear
disarmament does not yet bring solutions to the
Middle East.
63But RESET of the US-Russian arms control
removes many old obstacles and sets up new
background for such solutions for the Middle East
64(No Transcript)
65(No Transcript)
66(No Transcript)
67Technical Impediments to Nuclear Non-Proliferation
Long life cycle of FM
Huge size and variety of arsenals
Abundance of weapon-grade nuclear materials and
ability to recover them to weapon-usable status
after most ways of disposition
Difficulties with inspections and reliable
verification methods
68Legal problems
- Legality of NW and FM
- / Impasse of NW Convention
- Weakness of international legal regimes
- (NPT, NWFZs, MTCR, etc.)
- Weak sanctions. No sanctions btw P5
- Limited (bilateral) nature
- of most disarmament treaties
- with their verification practices
69Political obstacles
Weakness of World Community as a
political regulator
Divergence of interests of nuclear
powers, absence of joint strategy on
non-proliferation
Absence of positive international stimuli for
nuclear disarmament
Difference in priorities btw superpowers regarding
problems with nuclear weapons
70Current Russian Perceptions of Foreign Threats
War between Russia and the West
2007 26.
2008 31.
71Perception of Foreign Threats
NATO enlargement, Georgia and Ukraine joining NATO
46
Conflict on Caucasus
39
Terrorism.
35
World War
33
USA strengthening
29