Topic: Strategy Formulation - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 45
About This Presentation
Title:

Topic: Strategy Formulation

Description:

Retrenchment. Stability. Growth. Strategy Formulation: SBU ... Back to the three dimensions of your basic strategic posture. Growth/stability/retrenchment ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:145
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 46
Provided by: Marshall63
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Topic: Strategy Formulation


1
Topic Strategy Formulation
2
Here is where we were
Differentiation
Low Cost
Broad
Retrenchment
Focus
Stability
Growth
3
Strategy Formulation SBU
  • Three dimensions of your basic strategic posture
  • Growth/stability/retrenchment
  • Price/quality
  • Focus/broad

4
Strategy Formulation SBU
  • Back to the three dimensions of your basic
    strategic posture
  • Growth/stability/retrenchment
  • Price/quality
  • Focus/broad

5
Recall basic strategic posture
Differentiation
Low Cost
Broad
Focus
6
SBU Focus
  • This is competitive scope, and its more than
    just product line breadth
  • Segment scope Variety of products produced,
    buyers served
  • Vertical scope Extent to which activities are
    in-house or contracted
  • Geographic scope Range within which a firm
    competes with a particular coordinated strategy
  • Industry scope Range within which a firm
    competes with a particular coordinated strategy

7
Topic Portfolios
8
How do we integrate these individual strategies?
  • One method is to consider portfolios of
    businesses
  • Bud v. Light v. Michelob
  • Cars v. trucks v. financing v. insurance
  • US v. Mexico v. EU v. Japan v. China
  • Two models
  • BCG Model
  • GE Model
  • Same, only different

9
BCG Portfolio model
  • Assesses our portfolio of industry activity
  • (Although this can be broadened to include
    products within an industry, regions within an
    industry, etc.)
  • Stern Stalk (1998), Perspectives on Strategy
    from the Boston Consulting Group. New York Wiley

10
Strategy Formulation
BCG Portfolio Model
HIGH
Industry Growth
LOW
LOW
HIGH
Market Share
11
Strategy Formulation
BCG Portfolio Model
HIGH
Industry Growth
LOW
LOW
HIGH
Market Share
12
Strategy Formulation
BCG Portfolio Model
HIGH
Industry Growth
LOW
LOW
HIGH
Market Share
13
Strategy Formulation
BCG Portfolio Model
HIGH
Could be 1 to 4 Could be 6 to 55 Anchor the
ends, and plot where each business line (or
market, or product) lies
Industry Growth
LOW
LOW
HIGH
Market Share
14
Strategy Formulation
BCG Portfolio Model
HIGH
Could be -4 to 4 Could be 5 to 95 Anchor the
ends, and plot where each business line (or
market, or product) lies
Industry Growth
LOW
LOW
HIGH
Market Share
15
Might look like this
BCG Portfolio Model
HIGH
Industry Growth
LOW
LOW
HIGH
Market Share
16
Strategy Formulation
BCG Portfolio Model
HIGH
?
Stars
Industry Growth
Cash Cows
Dogs
LOW
LOW
HIGH
Market Share
17
Strategy Formulation
BCG Portfolio Model
HIGH
?
Stars
Industry Growth
Cash Cows
Dogs
LOW
LOW
HIGH
Market Share
18
Strategy Formulation
BCG Portfolio Model
HIGH
?
Stars
Industry Growth
Cash Cows
Dogs
LOW
LOW
HIGH
Market Share
19
Strategy Formulation
GE Business Screen Portfolio Model
HIGH
(5)
?
Winners
Industry Attractiveness
Profit Producers
Losers
LOW
(1)
WEAK
STRONG
Competitive Position
(1)
(5)
20
Strategy Formulation
GE Business Screen Portfolio Model
HIGH
(5)
?
Winners
Industry Attractiveness
Profit Producers
Losers
LOW
(1)
WEAK
STRONG
Competitive Position
(1)
(5)
21
Strategy Formulation
GE Business Screen Portfolio Model
HIGH
(5)
?
Winners
Lots more going on here than just growth and
market share
Industry Attractiveness
Profit Producers
Losers
LOW
(1)
WEAK
STRONG
Competitive Position
(1)
(5)
22
Strategy Formulation
GE Business Screen Portfolio Model
HIGH
(5)
?
Winners
Industry Attractiveness
Like what?
Profit Producers
Losers
LOW
(1)
WEAK
STRONG
Competitive Position
(1)
(5)
23
Strategy Formulation
GE Business Screen Portfolio Model
HIGH
(5)
An example Recall Halls model and how we
evaluated various competitors What factors
matter, and how much?
?
Winners
Industry Attractiveness
Profit Producers
Losers
LOW
(1)
WEAK
STRONG
Competitive Position
(1)
(5)
24
(No Transcript)
25
(No Transcript)
26
(No Transcript)
27
Strategy Formulation
GE Business Screen Portfolio Model
HIGH
(5)
?
Winners
Similar process on this axis
Industry Attractiveness
Profit Producers
Losers
LOW
(1)
WEAK
STRONG
Competitive Position
(1)
(5)
28
(No Transcript)
29
Strategy Formulation
GE Business Screen Portfolio Model
(4.5)
IA
(1.5)
(1.5)
(4.5)
CP
30
Strategy Formulation
GE Business Screen Portfolio Model
(4.5)

IA
(1.5)
(1.5)
(4.5)
CP
31
Strategy Formulation
GE Business Screen Portfolio Model
(4.5)




IA


(1.5)
(1.5)
(4.5)
CP
32
Strategy Formulation
Can apply by market or product, too
(4.5)
What makes each market attractive or not? What
makes for a competitive position?
Market Attractiveness
(1.5)
(1.5)
(4.5)
Comp. Pos.
33
Strategy Formulation
Can apply by market or product, too
(4.5)
Do this for your current markets
Market Attractiveness
(1.5)
(1.5)
(4.5)
Comp. Pos.
34
Other ways to evaluate competitive position
35
Plot your own businesses (or products or mkts
(rather than you vs. competitors)
G of E
HIGH
Power Alley
Zone of Competitive Battle
Relative Differentiation
Power Alley
Danger Zone
Death Valley
LOW
LOW
HIGH
Relative Cost
36
Strategy formulation Other issues
  • Game theory (if time)
  • Functional strategies
  • Pitfalls

37
Strategy Formulation
Game Theory
Maintain
B
A
Incumbent Options
D
C
Cut
Maintain
Cut
Attacker Options
38
Strategy Formulation
Game Theory
Maintain
100
70
B
A
60
70
Jones Options
120
80
D
C
20
30
Cut
Maintain
Cut
Smith Options
39
Strategy Formulation
Game Theory
Maintain
100
70
B
A
60
70
Jones Options
120
80
D
C
20
30
Cut
Maintain
Cut
Smith Options
40
Strategy Formulation
Game Theory
Maintain
100
70
B
A
60
70
Jones Options
120
80
C
110!
20
30
Cut
Maintain
Cut
Smith Options
41
RecallLevels of Strategy Formulation
  • Corporate
  • Business Unit (SBU)
  • Functional (Value Chain)

42
Strategy Formulation Functional
  • Traditionally, functional areas of the business
  • Recall the Value Chain
  • S W for each link
  • Strategies for each link
  • Thats better than strict functional area
    strategies

43
Evaluating Strategies
  • 1. Is it profitable?
  • 2. Does it conform to our mission?
  • 3. Does it involve a LTSCA?
  • 4. Is it feasible?
  • 5. Is it an acceptable risk?
  • 6. Is it responsive to our external environment?
  • 7. Does it provide adequate flexibility?
  • 8. Is the time frame appropriate?
  • 9. Is it profitable?

44
Evaluating Strategies
  • 1. Is it profitable?
  • 2. Does it conform to our mission?
  • 3. Does it involve a LTSCA?
  • 4. Is it feasible?
  • 5. Is it an acceptable risk?
  • 6. Is it responsive to our external environment?
  • 7. Does it provide adequate flexibility?
  • 8. Is the time frame appropriate?
  • 9. Is it profitable?

45
Another macro-level summary
  • Mission Basic strategic posture (cost/diff,
    growth/stabil, broad/focus)
  • SW Value chain
  • OT 5 forces dimensions of those barriers to
    entry strategic inflection points
  • LTSCA Criteria, Halls model
  • Issues problems Potentially all
  • Strategies Corp (growth intensive, integrative,
    diverse) SBU (cost/diff, competitive scope,
    portfolios, Hall, game theory) functional (value
    chain) evaluation
  • Fallout Potentially all
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com