Title: Searching for Solar Shocks
1Searching for Solar Shocks
- Including a brief history of
- X-ray astronomy
- H. Hudson, SPRC/UCSD/ISAS
2Beautiful Chandra shock
(E0102-72)
3How X-ray astronomy began
- September 21, 1859 (Carrington)
- Kew Gardens - magnetic effects
- The proper conservatism of L. Kelvin of Largs
4(No Transcript)
5(No Transcript)
6Latent discoveries
- X-rays (Roentgen, 1895)
- The ionosphere (Heaviside, 1902)
- Collisionless shock waves - ?
- Space weather - ??
7Oliver Heaviside
- Maxwells equations
- Laplace transforms
- The Heaviside function
- Telegraph equation - Pupin Laboratory
- Heavy opposition to quaternions
- T.S. Eliot, Cats, Journey to the Heaviside
Layer - Not the father of X-ray astronomy (due credit to
B. Rossi, of course) - Why should I refuse a good dinner simply because
I don't understand the digestive processes
involved.
8Were in a golden era of coronal observation
9(No Transcript)
10The dynamic corona
11(No Transcript)
12The boundary between Photosphere and corona
- Density plummets precipitously
- Collisionality diminishes
- Radiation decouples
- Plasma beta drops drastically
13T.R.
T
B
0
Height in corona
14(No Transcript)
15Solar shock Type II burst
16A Type II burst is the same thing as a slow
drift burst - perhaps discovered by early
military radars explained by J. P. Wild and Y.
Uchida
(recall l-2 ne)
III
Wavelength
II
Time
17Meter-waves and soft X-rays
- Megahertz vs Exahertz
- Radiative transfer vs direct view
- Magnetic effects vs Bremsstrahlung
- Inherent fuzziness vs sharp resolution
- But - by 1998, wed seen Types I, III, IV and
others
18But not the simplest and most obvious Type II!
19X-ray observation of a global wave
- Wave propagation tells us about coronal structure
- The innermost (earliest) motions tell us about
the flare process itself
20Moreton-Ramsey wave and EIT wave
21Why didnt SXT discover SXT waves?
- SXT views the whole corona
- Fast-mode MHD waves must involve compressional
heating - SXT response increases monotonically with
temperature - So why did it take 8 years and the competitive
example of EIT?
22Factors abetting wave detectionin soft X-rays
- The wave neednt be shocked
- The SXT response strongly favors detection of a
temperature increase (adiabatic law)
23Sensitivity estimation
2
R
(n,T
)
const
n
S
(T
),
i
e
i
e
e
_at_
(
l
n
(
R
))
d
(
l
n
(
S
))
i
i
(
T
)
3
,
i
e
_at_
(
l
n
(
T
))
d
(
l
n
(
T
))
e
e
24(No Transcript)
25SXT and TRACE responses
Courtesy N. V. Nitta
26Factors reducing sensitivity
- Poor CCD dynamic range (AEC)
- Limited SXT telemetry(Velocity filter)
- Photon counting statistics
- Scattering from grazing-incidence mirror
- Flare mode
27(No Transcript)
28(No Transcript)
29May 6, 1998
FOV 10 arc min
30FOV 5 arc min
31(No Transcript)
32(No Transcript)
33Gas pressure in flare loops
34(No Transcript)
35SOHO/ EIT
36Uchidas 1968 model
37A.R.
Uchida
S.W.
38OK, so what caused the wave?
- In principle we can see it all in soft X-rays
- The earliest manifestation of the wave is within
20,000 km of the flare core - But it is significantly displaced from the soft
X-ray core of the flare
39(No Transcript)
40Mysteries of low b plasma
- Everything seems to expand (cf. Aly)
- The Virial Theorem looks goofy too
41Implosion conjecture
- At low b, the coronal energy is purely B2/8p
- During a flare, theres no time for energy
transport through the photosphere - Therefore, some field lines must shorten
42Open field lines
Closed field lines
Isomagnetobars
How low-b implosions must work
43MHD Virial Theorem
44The end, thanks
45The end, thanks
46(No Transcript)