Unified State Examination: Lessons and Perspectives - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 21
About This Presentation
Title:

Unified State Examination: Lessons and Perspectives

Description:

SAMARA REGION. Management by the outcomes. USE 2004. Results of the education. system functioning ... USE 2004 in SAMARA region. 1. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:34
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 22
Provided by: kirillv
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Unified State Examination: Lessons and Perspectives


1
Unified State Examination Lessons and
Perspectives
  • Victor Bolotov
  • Head of Federal Service for Supervision in the
    Field of Education and Science,
  • Ministry of Education and Science,
  • Galina Kovalyova
  • Deputy Director of Federal Institute for
    Educational Measurement
  • Russian Federation

2
Political aspects
  • Effective educational management at the country
    level requires the objective and reliable
    information about the educational outcomes at
    different level (international, federal,
    regional).
  • Countries will need Bologna Declaration for the
    general education similar as for Higher
    education.

3
Starting point
  • Subjective nature of the knowledge based
    assessment of general school graduates (long
    history of oral examinations)
  • Universities do not trust school assessment -gt
    double examination
  • Growing inequity in access to higher education
  • rural vs. urban students
  • rich vs. poor families

4
Proposed Solution 2001
  • Unified graduation examination equal
    requirements and comparable results
  • Graduation examinations accepted as University
    entrance examinations

5
Proposed Solution 2001
  • Introduction of the objective independent form of
    assessment which provides the basis to
  • evaluate the quality of education
  • improve the school assessment
  • increase the access to professional education for
    the school leavers with different backgrounds
  • make University entrance examinations more
    transparent to public, etc.

6
Implementation Story
  • 2001
  • 4 regions out of 89,
  • 16 Universities (1,6),
  • 30 000 students (2)
  • 2004
  • 64 regions out of 89,
  • 950 Universities (75),
  • 900000 students (75)

7
Outputs up to date
  • Main results examination materials and the
    technology give more objective and reliable
    results in comparison with the traditional
    examinations
  • USE results started to be used as a quality
    evaluation tool for education managers and
    policymakers at different levels
  • Number of newly enrolled students from rural
    areas increased up to 10

8
Outputs up to date
  • Analytic results of USE started to be used as the
    basis for new textbook development and the basis
    for upgrading teacher training programs
  • Main social result increase of the attention of
    the society to school, to the content of education

9
Regional Experience
  • SAMARA REGION

10
Management by the outcomes
USE 2004
11
USE as an information and instrumental base
USE 2004
  • Quality monitoring of the educational system
    functioning
  • Means of priorities regulation
  • Means of forming actual unified educational space
  • Means of education quality management
  • Means of the education system effectiveness
    evaluation as reflection of correlation between
    the attained outcomes and the spent resources
  • Means of commensuration with the state and
    international standards for the educational
    system outcomes

12
USE Results - Mathematics
USE 2003
13
Admission of students from rural schools to
institutions of higher education of the Samara
region on the basis of the USE results
14
Public participation in the USE
  • Public observers are selected from
  • Members of parents committees of the regional
    educational institutions
  • Members of trustees boards of the regional
    educational institutions
  • Members of the regional public organizations and
    associations
  • Representatives of educational institutions from
    other regions of Russia

15
USE 2004 in SAMARA region
  • 1. All institutions of higher education in the
    region took part in the USE.
  • 2. All faculties admitted students to
    institutions of higher education on the basis of
    the USE results.
  • 3. All colleges of the region took part in the
    USE.
  • 4. Number of participants 31623.
  • 5. Number of examinations/persons 91781.
  •  

16
Comparison of school year marks and USE marks
17
Those who were accepted with the satisfactory
marks and had the satisfactory marks in the first
semester 63
Results of different categories of students in
Universities (first semester)
Those who were accepted with the excellent marks
and had the excellent marks in the first semester
36
Those who were accepted with the good marks and
had the good marks in the first semester 58
18
Issues To Be Solved Test Development
  • Balance between subject and competency oriented
    tests
  • Balance between
  • Skills to solve standard tasks
  • Higher order intellectual skills
  • Practical problem solving
  • Underestimation or ignoring of experimental tasks
  • Increase of practical orientation of the tests
  • Increase of predictive validity of tests
  • Use of ICT in USE

19
Issues To Be Solved Quality Assurance System
  • 1. Role of the USE in developing Russia wide
    system of evaluating the quality of education
  • 2. Role of the USE in evaluating the
    effectiveness of schools and teachers work

20
www.ege.edu.ru
21
  • Thank you and questions please!
  • Victor Bolotov
  • Head of Federal Service for Supervision in the
    Field of Education and Science,
  • Ministry of Education and Science,
  • Galina Kovalyova
  • Deputy Director of Federal Institute for
    Educational Measurement
  • Russian Federation
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com