Common Sense Concepts About Motion - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Common Sense Concepts About Motion

Description:

Common Sense Concepts About Motion – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:52
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 32
Provided by: physi98
Learn more at: http://physics.bu.edu
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Common Sense Concepts About Motion


1
Common Sense Concepts About Motion
  • By Ibrahim Abou Halloun and David Hestenes
  • Presented by
  • Jonathan McLaughlin and Keith Magni

2
Overview
  • Common Sense Beliefs
  • Categories of Alternative Conceptions
  • Aristotelian
  • Impetus
  • Common Sense Concepts of College Students
  • Taxonomy of Common Sense Concepts about Motion

3
Common Sense Beliefs
  • every one of the misconceptions about motion
    common among students today was seriously
    advocated by leading intellectuals in
    pre-Newtonian times.

4
Common Sense Beliefs
  • common sense beliefs should be treated with
    genuine respect by instructors. They should be
    regarded as serous alternative hypotheses to be
    evaluated by scientific procedures.

5
Aristotelian Physics
  • The speed of an object is proportional to its
    weight.
  • vW/R
  • Quantitative physics was impossible.
  • Only living things can apply a force. Non-living
    things can only stop or guide motion.

6
Aristotelian Physics
  • Forces only move an object when they overcome an
    objects resistance (related to inertia/weight).
  • VF/R
  • Without a force, an object comes to rest
    immediately.
  • Free-falling objects increase their weight as
    they get closer to their natural place on earth.
  • Mediums can both resist motion and propel an
    object.

7
Impetus Physics
  • the active agent imparts to the
  • object a certain immaterial motive power
    which sustains the bodys motion until it has
    been
  • dissipated due to resistance.

8
Impetus Physics
  • Allows for the explanation of
  • circular impetus persistent
  • motion of the planets and
  • the grinders wheel.
  • Allows for motion in a vacuum

9
Impetus Physics
  • The Historical Precursor of momentum and Kinetic
    Energy.

10
Impetus Physics
  • Albert of Saxony uses Impetus
  • to explain projectile motion.

11
Impetus Physics
  • A of S on Projectile Motion
  • Compromise between
  • Impetus
  • Gravity
  • Air resistance

12
Impetus Physics
  • A of S on Projectile Motion
  • Three Stage Trajectory
  • Initial Stage impetus suppresses the effect of
    gravity.
  • Intermediate Stage shows compromise between
    impetus and gravity.
  • Final Stage the projectile falls vertically in
    natural Motion.

13
Impetus Physics
  • Kinematical Ideas also developed in the14th
    century along w/ Impetus theory.
  • Distinctions made between uniform velocity
    uniform acceleration, and non-uniform
    acceleration.
  • Resulting in birth of concepts of instantaneous
    velocity and acceleration.

14
Impetus Physics
  • Kinematical Ideas developed in 14th Century
  • Oresme develops graphical method of representing
    variable quantities.
  • Used to derive Mertonian Mean Speed Rule.

15
Impetus Physics
  • Kinematical Ideas developed in the 14th century
  • in a given time interval, the distance
    traveled w/ uniform acceleration is equal to the
    distance traveled w/ uniform speed equal to the
    instantaneous speed in the accelerated motion at
    the middle instant of the time interval.

16
Impetus Physics
  • Kinematical Ideas developed in the 14th century
  • These developments were essential prerequisites
    for Galileos kinematical analysis of projectile
  • motion.

17
Common Sense Concepts of College Students
  • 478 Students given a multiple choice diagnostic
    pre/post-test used to assess common sense
    concepts.
  • Alternative answers on test correspond with
    Aristotelian and Impetus theories.
  • 22 students were further interviewed to gain
    further insight into conceptions.

18
Pre/Post-Test Results
  • 18 of students answers were predominantly
    Aristotelian.
  • 65 of students answers were predominantly
    Impetus type.
  • 17 of students answers were predominantly
    Newtonian.

19
Pre/Post-Test Highlights
  • Students demonstrated a belief that
  • an object slows down if no net force is applied
    (47/20).
  • an object under constant force moves at constant
    speed (66 /54).
  • an impetus is required to keep an object moving
    (65/44).

20
Student Interviews
  • Students were asked questions about their
    conceptions of
  • General concepts of motion
  • Free particle motion
  • One-dimensional motion under a constant force
  • Two-dimensional motion under a constant force

21
General Concepts of Motion
  • Students had difficulty distinguishing between
    kinematical concepts.
  • Students believed that inanimate objects may stop
    or redirect objects but cannot generate force.

22
General Concepts of Motion
  • Students believed that gravity is an impetus
    force.
  • Students accepted the existence of a vacuum, but
    insisted that motion could not occur outside of a
    material medium.

23
Free-Particle Motion
  • Students with Aristotelian beliefs had bizarre
    arguments.
  • Ex) A block sliding on a surface would come to
    rest because you need wheels to keep it going.
  • Students with impetus beliefs varied in their
    explanations. Some believed that objects begin
    losing impetus immediately, while other believed
    that objects lose impetus when they encounter
    resistance.

24
One-Dimensional Motion Under A Constant Force
  • Some students believed that objects under
    constant force would speed up but eventually a
    speed limit would be reached.

25
Two-Dimensional Motion Under A Constant Force
  • Students had a concept of projectile motion and
    that the path of a projectile was parabolic, but
    had trouble identifying that projectile motion
    was the result of a constant force.

26
Consistency of Ideas
  • Students were inconsistent in their responses,
    however, students with quasi-Newtonian beliefs
    were much more consistent in their beliefs.
  • Students who showed common-sense ideas used a mix
    of Aristotelian and Impetus type explanations for
    physical events.

27
Consistency of Ideas
  • much of the incoherence in the student CS
    common sense systems is the result of vague and
    undifferentiated concepts.

28
Persistence of Alternative Concepts
  • As a rule, students held firm to mistaken
    beliefs even when confronted with phenomena that
    contradicted those beliefs.
  • Students tended not to contradict their own
    beliefs but to attribute the contradiction to
    some other principle.

29
Persistence of Alternative Concepts
  • We doubt that a demonstration can be effective
    unless it is performed in a context that elicits
    and helps to resolve conflicts between common
    sense and specific scientific concepts.

30
Persistence of Alternative Concepts
  • students who showed obstinate beliefs were able
    to come to adequate justifications, mostly not
    because they have seen something in conflict
    with their beliefs, but because they came to
    realize the inconsistency of their thinking when
    asked to reflect on their own arguments.

31
Taxonomy of Common Sense Concepts About Motion
  • Principles of Motion
  • Correspond to Newtons Laws
  • Influences on Motion
  • Correspond to Force influences
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com