RegStrat Six Countries Programme workshop - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 8
About This Presentation
Title:

RegStrat Six Countries Programme workshop

Description:

1. Overview of the pilot action - What is the function of the ... neighbour's regions: Hradec Kralove, Liberec (Czech Republic), Saxony (Germany). Who else? ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:39
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 9
Provided by: valerie70
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: RegStrat Six Countries Programme workshop


1
RegStrat Six Countries Programme workshop
  • BENCHMARKING EXERCISE
  • Jan Skonieczny Wroclaw University of Technology
  • Marta Zalewska Lower Silesia Centre for
    Regional Studies
  • Dublin 19-20 April 2007

2
1. Overview of the pilot action - What is the
function of the pilot exercise for The Lower
Silesia Voivodship?
  • Which SPI tool will you use?
  • Benchmarking
  • What do you want to accomplish with the SPI tool?
  • Gain knowledge about benchmarking
  • Develop the skills of using benchmarking
  • Position calibrate the Lower Silesia Region
  • Identification of gaps between the Lower Silesia
    region and benchmarked regions
  • Why do you carry out this pilot?
  • Increase awareness about benchmarking (SPI tools)
    among regional stakeholders
  • Develop a common understanding collaboration
    for SPI tools among regional stakeholders
  • Improve knowledge of RIS and formulate ideas for
    its revalidation in the context of benchmarking
    exercise that was carried out
  • Preparation for future Regional Development
    expenditures - fomulated conclusions in the
    context of benchmarking exercise that was carried
    out
  • What should you achieve with this pilot?
  • Benchmarking (SPI tools) awareness capability
  • Awareness of the RIS and its possible
    modifications
  • Integration of regional stakeholders around the
    RIS
  • Creation of the discussion platform about RIS in
    the Lower Silesia region among regional
    stakeholders

3
6.1. Problems
  • 1. Generating, creating and building of index
    for RTDI activities
  • in order to compare with other regions
    (How?)
  • 2. Choose of indicators, which can be ingredients
    of the index in question
  • a. first proposal of IRER
  • - General economic background (land,
    population, GDP, employment, labour,
    productivity),
  • - Human capital base (enrolment,
    employment),
  • - Economic structure (firms for size and
    sector, gross fixed capital formation),
  • Innovation potential (GERD, its financial
    sources and performers),
  • - RD personnel (total, researcheres,
    university professors),
  • - Innovation activity (innovating firm),
  • - Patents and publication (total,
    pro-capita and pro-researcher)
  • b. Which else?

4
6.2. Problems
  • 3. Choose of regions, with which we can compare.
    (It refers polish and european regions) - first
    proposal similarity
  • polish regions second growth poles
    Dolnoslaskie, Malopolskie, Wielkopolskie,
    Slaskie),
  • neighbours regions Hradec Kralove, Liberec
    (Czech Republic), Saxony (Germany).
  • Who else?

5
7. Outcomes which should be achieved
  • Carrying out of regional photography in RTDI
    field
  • Definition of position of region in relation to
    other European regions
  • Definition of regional development gaps regarding
    indicators in the RTDI field
  • Gathering information which can help to rationale
    management of own and european financial
    resources in investments in RTDI field
  • Creating of base for formulation and
    implementation of RTDI policies in the Region.

6
8. Envisaged impact on Lower Silesia
  • 1. Short-term
  • a. set up of regional regionalnego think-tank
    e.g.(Lower Silesia Centre for the Regional
    Studies) using SPI Tools and gained experiences
  • 2. Medium-term
  • a. support regional authorities in evaluation
    and modification of RIS in terms of expenditures
    of European funds (next programming period
    2007-2013, Regional Operation Programme).
  • 3. Long-term
  • a. the base to the next step in the SPI Policy
    circle, e.g. preparing for foresight exercise
    (regional, technical and scientifical)

7
9. Critical/ relevant issues
  • What are the best indicators to describe RTDI
    fields?
  • Choose of benchmark (On which base do we choose
    a region (or regions), with which we
    will make a comparison?)
  • Finding of ways to implement outcomes of the
    benchmark exercise to practice (How to incite
    policy makers for applying outcomes benchmark
    exercise as the base of their decisions?)
  • How to use SPI tools in creation of the regional
    policy, especially in the field of innovation?
  • In what should Lower Silesia invest ca 1,2 Mld
    Euro to realize acceptance strategic
    targets (Development Strategy of Lower Silesia
    Voivodship, Lower Silesia Innovation Strategy
    quality of life the inhabitants in the Region)?

8
  • Thank you for your atention
  • jan.skonieczny_at_pwr.wroc.pl
  • marta.zalewska_at_pwr.wroc.pl
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com