ROBOTIC THERAPY FOR FORCE TRAINING OF THE UPPER EXTREMITY IN CHRONIC HEMIPARETIC STROKE - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 13
About This Presentation
Title:

ROBOTIC THERAPY FOR FORCE TRAINING OF THE UPPER EXTREMITY IN CHRONIC HEMIPARETIC STROKE

Description:

ROBOTIC THERAPY FOR FORCE TRAINING OF THE UPPER EXTREMITY IN CHRONIC ... scapular/shoulder alignment. passive & active assisted ROM. task-oriented re-education ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:509
Avg rating:5.0/5.0
Slides: 14
Provided by: armgui
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: ROBOTIC THERAPY FOR FORCE TRAINING OF THE UPPER EXTREMITY IN CHRONIC HEMIPARETIC STROKE


1
ROBOTIC THERAPY FOR FORCE TRAINING OF THE UPPER
EXTREMITY IN CHRONIC HEMIPARETIC STROKE
  • Leonard Kahn, M.S.
  • W. Zev Rymer, M.D., Ph.D.
  • David Reinkensmeyer, Ph.D.

2
Visual distortion
Proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation
Bobath technique
Task-specific reeducation
Bilateral imitation
Resistive
WHICH ONE(S)??
Destabilizing
Active assist
Peg-in-groove
Passive constrained
Isometric
Stabilizing
Passive
3
Background - Rehabilitators for UE
  • MIT MANUS planar assistance in acute stroke
  • MIME bimanual and 3-D assistance in chronic
    stroke
  • ARM Guide linear assistance throughout workspace
    in chronic stroke

MIT - MANUS
MIME
ARM Guide
4
Rationale
ARM Guide results
Reaching along Guide
Performance of ADLs
5
Free Reaching Results
Data adapted from Lum et al., Arch. PMR, 2002
6
Aims Hypotheses
  • Aims
  • to implement force guided training using the ARM
    Guide
  • to compare force guided training with traditional
    therapy and free reaching therapy for restoring
    UE function
  • Hypotheses Guided force training
  • accounts for the difference between the MIME and
    ARM Guide free reaching outcomes
  • will be more effective than free reaching
    exercises and conventional therapy in promoting
    arm movement recovery

7
Subject Population
Chedoke-McMaster Scale
Normal unimpaired movement
7 6 5 4 3 2 1
  • Chronic hemiparesis (gt 6 months post injury)
  • Absence of impairment or injury to ipsilesional
    arm
  • Absence of visual neglect or visuo-perceptual
    disturbance

60
Complete hemi-paralysis
8
Therapy group 1 conventional therapy
  • scapular/shoulder alignment
  • passive active assisted ROM
  • task-oriented re-education
  • 1 hr/day, 3 days/wk, 8wks

9
Therapy group 2 free reaching therapy
10
Therapy group 3 Guided Force Training
S
F
A
M
adaptive assistance
11
Expected Results
  • Improved free reach extent from first ARM Guide
    study
  • Better results for robot therapy group than free
    reaching and NDT group
  • Ultimately, greater functional gains in guided
    force training group

12
Early results adaptive assistance
early trial
late trial
13
Early results supported reaching
Reach distance cm
Free reaching
Guided force
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com