Title: Treatment Process Modeling by QSAR Approach Biodegradation
1Treatment Process Modeling by QSAR Approach -
Biodegradation
2Contents
- QSAR Introduction
- QSBR Introduction
- Results and discussion
- Current QSAR project in UNESCO-IHE
3Introduction to the (Q)SAR concept
- Chemicals with similar molecular structures have
similar effects in physical and biological
systems - ? qualitative model (SAR)
- The extent of an effect varies in a systematic
way with variations in molecular structure - ? quantitative model (QSAR)
Biodegradation index 4.066-0.007MW-0.314H/C r
0.866, r2 0.750, Sig. lt 0.005, n 156
Activity depends on chemical structure
4SAR vs QSAR
- SAR is based on the similarity principle
- The principle is assumed, but in the reality it
is not always true - - Similarity of structures
- - Similarity of descriptors
- The authenticity depends on the type of the
relationship between descriptors (numerical
representation of chemicals) and activity - The type of the relationship should be known (or
derived)
5SAR vs. QSARhow could we say there is a
difference ?
- Three common things to this point
- Both methods use numerical representation of
chemical compounds - Both methods need to decide which representation
to use - Both methods need to derive the relationship
between numerical representation (descriptors,
etc.) and activity.
6QSAR in water treatment processes
- Results obtained from valid qualitative or
quantitative structure-activity relationship
models can provide the removal of PhACs in
drinking water and the process selection for
target compounds. Results of QSAR may be used
instead of testing if results are derived from a
QSAR model whose scientific validity has been
established
7QSAR in water treatment processes
- In principle, QSARs can be used to
- - provide information for use in priority
setting treatments for target compounds - - guide the experimental design of a test or
testing strategy - - improve the evaluation of existing test data
- - provide mechanistic information (e.g. to
support the grouping of chemicals into
categories) - - fill a data gap needed for classification
-
8OECD Principles for QSAR Validation
- QSAR should be associated with the following
information - - a defined endpoint
- - an unambiguous algorithm
- - appropriate measures of goodness-of-fit,
robustness and predictivity - - a mechanistic interpretation, if possible
9QSBR
- Development of Quantitative Structure-Biodegradati
on Relationships (QSBRs) - - QSBRs has been developed to predict the
biodegradability of chemicals released to natural
systems using their structure-activity
relationships (SAR) - - The development of QSBRs has been relatively
slow compared with proliferation of QSARs because
of the nature of the biodegradability endpoint - - QSBR is very complex because
- 1. Chemical structure
- 2. Environmental conditions
- 3. Bioavailability of the chemical
10QSBR
- - Limitations often associated in developing
QSBR - 1. Only within cogeneric series of chemicals
- 2. The absence of standardised and uniform
biodegradation databases - - Recent years, a very intensive development of
new and better qualitative and quantitative
biodegradability models was observed - - How many QSBR have been developed ?
- A literature search on QSBR was performed
including literature published showed more than
84 models - - However, only a few models provided an
acceptable level of agreement between estimated
and experimental data
11QSBR
- - All QSBR models until 1994 were reviewed by
several researchers for their applicability - 1. Group contribution method (OECD, PLS,
BIOWIN, MultiCASE) - 2. Chemometric methods (CART)
- 3. Expert system (BESS, CATABOL, TOPKAT)
- - According to the previous studies, the group
contribution method seems to be the most applied
and successful way of modeling biodegradation
12Group Contribution Method
- OECD hierarchical model approach
- Multivariable Partial Least Approach (PLS) model
- BIOWIN
- MultiCASE anaerobic program
13What Does the BIOWIN Model Do?
- Provide estimates of biodegradability useful in
chemical screening under aerobic condition
(1,2,5,6) - Provide approximate time required to biodegrade
in a stream (3,4) - Recently, BIOWIN was updated and now it can
estimate anaerobic biodegradation potential (7)
BIOWIN has 7 models (U.S. EPA, 2007)
14Materials and method
- Finding Molecular Descriptors
- Sofrware Delft Chemtech, Dragon, Chem3D etc
- Selection of Molecular Descriptors
- 1. PCA (SPSS)
- 2. Genetic Algorithm-Variable Subset Selection
(Mobydigs)
15Principal Component Analysis
16Principal Component Analysis (PCA)
- Variables MW, MV, log Kow, dipole, length,
width, depth, equiv width, HL surface, polar
surface are - Assessment of the suitability of the data for PCA
- - KMO gt 0.6 (KMO 0.6), Barletts Test of
Sphericity lt 0.05 (lt0.005) - Determination of the number of factors by Kaise
criterion, scree plot and Montecarlo parallel
analysis
17Classification PhACs - PCA
HL-neu
HL-ion
HP-neu
HP-ion
The two-component solution explained a total of
67 of the variance with Component 1 contributing
46 and Component2 contributing 21 Component 1
SIZE and component 2 Hydrophobic/Hydrophilicity
18Biodegradation (Aerobic)
- HP and HP-ionic compounds were not feasible to
come up with equation because of collinearity
problem in variables - (Violation in MLR assumptions)
19Innovative system for removal of micropollutants
RBF and NF membrane
days
RBF
days - weeks
weeks
weeks - months
months
Membrane
longer
20QSAR Models Decision Support Framework
Organic micropollutants
QSAR
BIOWIN
Biological treatment
Physical/Chemical Treatment
Kow
KO3
ARR
RBF /DUNE
Membrane
GAC
AOP
MW
NF
RO
Cl2
O3
Process selection and comparative performance
assessment
21Current QSAR project
2008
GIST
Analysis of PhACs LC-MS / AUTO SPE
QSAR Tools
Selection of Target compounds
Selection of Target compounds
Physical-chemical characteristics Vs. Water
treatments
2009
Selection of Water Treatments
Selection of Water Treatments
Selected water Treatments
PhACs removal using selected water treatments by
UNESCO-IHE
PhACs removal using selected water treatments by
GIST
Classification, Database, Model development
A decision support tool for PhACS removal for
water utility
2010