Treatment Process Modeling by QSAR Approach Biodegradation - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 21
About This Presentation
Title:

Treatment Process Modeling by QSAR Approach Biodegradation

Description:

The extent of an effect varies in a systematic way with variations in molecular ... of factors by Kaise criterion, scree plot and Montecarlo parallel analysis ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:117
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 22
Provided by: UNE89
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Treatment Process Modeling by QSAR Approach Biodegradation


1
Treatment Process Modeling by QSAR Approach -
Biodegradation
  • Sung Kyu (Andrew) Maeng

2
Contents
  • QSAR Introduction
  • QSBR Introduction
  • Results and discussion
  • Current QSAR project in UNESCO-IHE

3
Introduction to the (Q)SAR concept
  • Chemicals with similar molecular structures have
    similar effects in physical and biological
    systems
  • ? qualitative model (SAR)
  • The extent of an effect varies in a systematic
    way with variations in molecular structure
  • ? quantitative model (QSAR)

Biodegradation index 4.066-0.007MW-0.314H/C r
0.866, r2 0.750, Sig. lt 0.005, n 156
Activity depends on chemical structure
4
SAR vs QSAR
  • SAR is based on the similarity principle
  • The principle is assumed, but in the reality it
    is not always true
  • - Similarity of structures
  • - Similarity of descriptors
  • The authenticity depends on the type of the
    relationship between descriptors (numerical
    representation of chemicals) and activity
  • The type of the relationship should be known (or
    derived)

5
SAR vs. QSARhow could we say there is a
difference ?
  • Three common things to this point
  • Both methods use numerical representation of
    chemical compounds
  • Both methods need to decide which representation
    to use
  • Both methods need to derive the relationship
    between numerical representation (descriptors,
    etc.) and activity.

6
QSAR in water treatment processes
  • Results obtained from valid qualitative or
    quantitative structure-activity relationship
    models can provide the removal of PhACs in
    drinking water and the process selection for
    target compounds. Results of QSAR may be used
    instead of testing if results are derived from a
    QSAR model whose scientific validity has been
    established

7
QSAR in water treatment processes
  • In principle, QSARs can be used to
  • - provide information for use in priority
    setting treatments for target compounds
  • - guide the experimental design of a test or
    testing strategy
  • - improve the evaluation of existing test data
  • - provide mechanistic information (e.g. to
    support the grouping of chemicals into
    categories)
  • - fill a data gap needed for classification

8
OECD Principles for QSAR Validation
  • QSAR should be associated with the following
    information
  • - a defined endpoint
  • - an unambiguous algorithm
  • - appropriate measures of goodness-of-fit,
    robustness and predictivity
  • - a mechanistic interpretation, if possible

9
QSBR
  • Development of Quantitative Structure-Biodegradati
    on Relationships (QSBRs)
  • - QSBRs has been developed to predict the
    biodegradability of chemicals released to natural
    systems using their structure-activity
    relationships (SAR)
  • - The development of QSBRs has been relatively
    slow compared with proliferation of QSARs because
    of the nature of the biodegradability endpoint
  • - QSBR is very complex because
  • 1. Chemical structure
  • 2. Environmental conditions
  • 3. Bioavailability of the chemical

10
QSBR
  • - Limitations often associated in developing
    QSBR
  • 1. Only within cogeneric series of chemicals
  • 2. The absence of standardised and uniform
    biodegradation databases
  • - Recent years, a very intensive development of
    new and better qualitative and quantitative
    biodegradability models was observed
  • - How many QSBR have been developed ?
  • A literature search on QSBR was performed
    including literature published showed more than
    84 models
  • - However, only a few models provided an
    acceptable level of agreement between estimated
    and experimental data

11
QSBR
  • - All QSBR models until 1994 were reviewed by
    several researchers for their applicability
  • 1. Group contribution method (OECD, PLS,
    BIOWIN, MultiCASE)
  • 2. Chemometric methods (CART)
  • 3. Expert system (BESS, CATABOL, TOPKAT)
  • - According to the previous studies, the group
    contribution method seems to be the most applied
    and successful way of modeling biodegradation

12
Group Contribution Method
  • OECD hierarchical model approach
  • Multivariable Partial Least Approach (PLS) model
  • BIOWIN
  • MultiCASE anaerobic program

13
What Does the BIOWIN Model Do?
  • Provide estimates of biodegradability useful in
    chemical screening under aerobic condition
    (1,2,5,6)
  • Provide approximate time required to biodegrade
    in a stream (3,4)
  • Recently, BIOWIN was updated and now it can
    estimate anaerobic biodegradation potential (7)

BIOWIN has 7 models (U.S. EPA, 2007)
14
Materials and method
  • Finding Molecular Descriptors
  • Sofrware Delft Chemtech, Dragon, Chem3D etc
  • Selection of Molecular Descriptors
  • 1. PCA (SPSS)
  • 2. Genetic Algorithm-Variable Subset Selection
    (Mobydigs)

15
Principal Component Analysis
16
Principal Component Analysis (PCA)
  • Variables MW, MV, log Kow, dipole, length,
    width, depth, equiv width, HL surface, polar
    surface are
  • Assessment of the suitability of the data for PCA
  • - KMO gt 0.6 (KMO 0.6), Barletts Test of
    Sphericity lt 0.05 (lt0.005)
  • Determination of the number of factors by Kaise
    criterion, scree plot and Montecarlo parallel
    analysis

17
Classification PhACs - PCA
HL-neu
HL-ion
HP-neu
HP-ion
The two-component solution explained a total of
67 of the variance with Component 1 contributing
46 and Component2 contributing 21 Component 1
SIZE and component 2 Hydrophobic/Hydrophilicity
18
Biodegradation (Aerobic)
  • HP and HP-ionic compounds were not feasible to
    come up with equation because of collinearity
    problem in variables
  • (Violation in MLR assumptions)

19
Innovative system for removal of micropollutants
RBF and NF membrane
days
RBF
days - weeks
weeks
weeks - months
months
Membrane
longer
20
QSAR Models Decision Support Framework
Organic micropollutants
QSAR
BIOWIN
Biological treatment
Physical/Chemical Treatment
Kow
KO3
ARR
RBF /DUNE
Membrane
GAC
AOP
MW
NF
RO
Cl2
O3
Process selection and comparative performance
assessment
21
Current QSAR project
2008
GIST
Analysis of PhACs LC-MS / AUTO SPE
QSAR Tools
Selection of Target compounds
Selection of Target compounds
Physical-chemical characteristics Vs. Water
treatments
2009
Selection of Water Treatments
Selection of Water Treatments
Selected water Treatments
PhACs removal using selected water treatments by
UNESCO-IHE
PhACs removal using selected water treatments by
GIST
Classification, Database, Model development
A decision support tool for PhACS removal for
water utility
2010
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com