EROSION - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 35
About This Presentation
Title:

EROSION

Description:

Massive data base assembled (1950s 1970) Standard plots established throughout the US ... Incorporation into watershed models of hydrology and sedimentology ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:441
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 36
Provided by: defau632
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: EROSION


1
EROSION SEDIMENT CONTROL
  • Historical Perspective
  • Erosion and Sediment Modeling

2
GEOLOGIC EROSION vs ACCELERATED EROSION
3
EARLY WORK
4
What is SCS?
  • Soil Erosion Service
  • Soil Conservation Service
  • Natural Resource Conservation Service

5
The Universal Soil Loss EquationARKLSCP
  • Massive data base assembled (1950s 1970)
  • Standard plots established throughout the US
  • 72.6 ft long
  • 13.3 ft wide
  • 9 slope
  • Fallow for two years
  • Up and downhill tillage

(Wischmeier and Smith, 1965 and 1978)
6
The Coshocton Wheel Samplerand H-flume
7
PREDICTING EROSION USLE/RUSLE
A statistically-based model
  • A R K LS C P

Some things we can control Some things we cannot
control
8
Rainfall Energy
R-factor
  • We cannot control R factor
  • Mobile, AL R 650
  • Oklahoma R 80 300
  • OKC R 200

9
Soil Erodibility K-factor
  • We have little control of K factor
  • Silt loam soil K .32
  • Loamy fine sand K .17
  • Affected by soil amendments

10
Length-Slope
LS-factor
  • We have limited control on LS factor
  • 9 slope, 72.6 ft LS 1.0
  • 10 slope, 200 ft LS 2.41
  • 15 slope, 200 ft LS 4.3
  • 20 slope, 200 ft LS 11.31

Terraces, diversions, grade control
11
Cover Factor - C
0.5 tons/ac straw C0.3 2.0 tons/ac
straw C0.09 4.0 tons/ac woodchips C0.42
We can have a big impact on C-factor
12
Cover Factor
Geotextiles C ???
13
Cover Management
  • Location of cover relative to receiving stream is
    important

14
EXAMPLE 1
  • Typical R 200
  • Darnell K 0.32
  • Slope Length 300 ft
  • Slope 5
  • Mature Forest C 0.001
  • Practice Factor P 1


gt LS 1.0
A 0.064 tons/ac-yr
15
EXAMPLE 2
  • Typical R 200
  • Darnell K 0.32
  • Slope Length 300 ft
  • Slope 5
  • Bare Soil (bulldozed) C 1
  • Practice Factor P 1


gt LS 1.0
A 64 tons/ac-yr
16
Ratio of Sediment ProductionChanged Land
Use/Undisturbed Forest
17
EROSION vs. SEDIMENT YIELD
GULLY
CHANNEL
18
Event-based erosion estimationModified
USLE(MUSLE)
  • Q Storm runoff
  • qp Peak discharge
  • KLSCP USLE parameters

WILLIAMS (1975)
19
Statistically Based Erosion Models
  • Not process based
  • Strong interactions between parameters,
    particularly with steep slopes characteristic of
    many urban sites
  • Requires a lot of data to project from one
    situation to another without massive data base

20
RECENT WORK
  • Extensive use of rainfall simulators and
    instrumented plots
  • Process based models
  • Incorporation into watershed models of hydrology
    and sedimentology
  • Include the impact of BMPs and channel erosion

21
RAINFALL SIMULATORS
  • Earliest version of rainfall simulator
  • Simulation became a powerful tool in erosion
    research

22
MODERN SIMULATORS
23
MODERN EROSION PLOTS
24
Characteristics of Recent Models 1990s
  • Process based
  • Divided into rill and inter-rill erosion
  • Consider concentrated flow erosion separate from
    rill and inter-rill
  • Deposition and detachment based on transport
    capacity and detachment potential.

25
Rill Interrill Erosion
  • Interrill erosion due to rainfall impact
  • Rill erosion due to shearing forces of
    runoff

26
RILL EROSION POTENTIALWEPP Model
  • Drc Rill detachment potential
  • Kr Rill erodibility
  • Channel shear gRS
  • tc Critical tractive force
  • Fa Correction factor for soil
  • type, cover, and freeze thaw

27
ACTUAL RILL EROSIONWEPP Model
  • Drc Rill detachment potential
  • Dr Actual detachment
  • qs Sediment load
  • Tc Transport capacity

28
(No Transcript)
29
TYPES OF EROSION Concentrated Flow or Ephemeral
Gully
  • Location is due to macrorelief
  • Shearing forces of runoff causes erosion

30
Concentrated Flow Erosion Foster-Lane Model
31
Concentrated Flow Erosion Foster-Lane
ModelAssumes Constant Flow Rate
Included in CREAMS and WEPP Models
32
Concentrated Flow Erosion KY DYRT Model
  • Allows varying flow rates
  • Allows layers of varying density
  • Allows deposition
  • Included in SEDIMOT III

33
DETACHMENT LIMITED AND TRANSPORT LIMITED FLOW
34
SEDIMENT SIZE DISTRIBUTION
  • Eroded size distribution needed to predict
    transport and BMP effectiveness
  • Methods available
  • CREAMS based model
  • Empirical study

35
OTHER WATERSHED MODELSWith Erosion Components
  • CREAMS
  • SEDIMOT II
  • SEDCAD
  • SEDIMOT III
  • AGNPS
  • SWAT
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com