Free Will - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 11
About This Presentation
Title:

Free Will

Description:

Certain arguments & theories challenge determinism in physical sciences. ... we have self awareness a sense that we can control & change our behaviour. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:61
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 12
Provided by: joannem4
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Free Will


1
Free Will Determinism
  • To what degree do we have choice?
  • Can we change situations.
  • Implications for legal system.
  • Is it possible to advocate free will and do
    scientific research?
  • Deterministic position our actions are
    determined by external internal forces
    operating on them eg. Behaviour parents,
    Biological hormones.
  • Free will position despite external internal
    forces, we can still choose our own behaviour.
  • Consider
  • Could your behaviour in a given situation have
    been different if you had willed it
  • Free will believers say yes, determinists say
    not.

2
DETERMINISM
  • A determinist argues that everything that
    happens has a cause. Then human behaviour is
    predictable and ? can be considered a science.
  • A freewiller argues that there is no
    definite cause, so human behaviour is not
    predictable.
  • Physics, chemistry etc. can give us accurate
    predictions from a deterministic position.
  • If we cannot do this with ?, either
  • i) It is a very different science.
  • ii) It is not a science.

3
PHYSICAL SCIENCES DETERMINISM
  • Certain arguments theories challenge
    determinism in physical sciences.
  • 1) Heisenbergs Uncertainty Principle
  • You cannot measure position velocity of a
    subatomic particle at the same time.
  • 2) Chaos Theory
  • A flap of a butterflys wings could change the
    whole weather system.
  • These chains of events dont lend themselves to
    prediction.

4
Behaviourist Freudian Approach
  • More approaches in ? are deterministic than free
    will.
  • Skinner - nearly all our behaviour is
    determined by environmental factors.
  • Reward
  • Behaviour Behaviour repeated
  • So we can predict someones response if we know
    current stimulus situation and conditioning
    history.
  • Bandura (neo behaviourist) adopted concept of
  • RECIPROCAL DETERMINISM.
  • Freud - strong believer in determinism. Even
    trivial phenomena, (Freudian slip) have causes
    within a persons motivation system.

5
Soft Determinism
  • William James distinguished between highly
    constrained (appears involuntary) modestly
    constrained (appears voluntary) situations.
  • If a child apologises for swearing
  • Is it because they will be punished (highly
    constrained)
  • OR
  • They are upset at causing offence (modestly
    constrained)
  • So soft determinism suggests that determinism is
    not all or nothing.

6
The Approaches Determinism
  • 1) Biological
  • Behaviour is determined by internal
    biological systems BUT
  • we have self awareness a sense that we can
    control
  • change our behaviour.
  • PHYSIOLOGICAL DETERMINISM
  • 2) Behavioural
  • All behaviour is learned and can be explained in
    terms of
  • environmental factors.
  • Skinner Freedom is an illusion.
  • ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINISM

7
The Approaches Determinism
  • 3) Psychoanalytic
  • Adult behaviour is predetermined by
    childhood events.
  • Not freely chosen. Freud also believed freedom
    is an illusion,
  • because causes of behaviour are unconscious.
  • BUT
  • Psychoanalysis is based on the principle that
    people can change.
  • So some free will is operating many of our
    actions are consciously done.
  • PSYCHIC DETERMINISM
  • 4) Cognitive
  • Proposed that our cognitions are consciously
    controlled
  • can be altered. So we have free will to choose
    alter our
  • thought patterns (not what book says).
  • FREE WILL

8
The Approaches Determinism
  • 5) Evolutionary
  • Characteristics are inherited and non-adaptive
  • ones are selected out.
  • So behaviour is subject to.
  • GENETIC DETERMINISM
  • 6) Humanistic
  • Embraces free will. Rogers humans have an
    innate drive
  • towards growth and self-actualisation.
    Encourages the idea
  • of humans being responsible for their actions.
    If we exercise
  • this free will, we achieve our potential.
  • See Frankill.
  • FREE WILL

9
The Approaches Determinism
  • 7) Testability
  • Problem with free will and determination is that
    we cannot test it but if behaviour is determined,
    then it ought to be predictable (Why?, Explain?).
  • BUT
  • We have limited knowledge of internal and
    external forces acting on
  • behaviour, so we cannot predict behaviour, nor
    know whether we are
  • governed by determination or have free will.
  • FREE WILL
  • Most of us have a sense of choice and
    responsibility.
  • Rogers created client-centred therapy on the
    basis that a client
  • has freewill. Not at mercy of outside forces.

10
The Approaches Determinism
  • 8) Causality
  • We need to know how free will causes behaviour.
    Determination is clear about the causes.
    Possibly
  • behaviour in the animal world is determined
    because they
  • do not think in the complex ways that humans
    do.

11
Conclusion
  • This is a philosophical rather than a
    scientifical question therefore not
    scientifically testable.
  • 2. There is more common ground between free will
    and determination than we realise. Scientists
    accept
  • Heredity
  • Past Experience
  • Present Environment
  • affect behaviour. Some are internal, some
    external and can be traced to causal reasons in
    the past.
  • Maybe free will and determination are not
    incompatible. Determinists argue
  • An individuals actions are caused by a physical
    sequence of events in the brain. Free will
    (conscious consideration) is part of that
    sequence. So human responsibility can also hold
    a place in determinism.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com