Chasing Shadows - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 44
About This Presentation
Title:

Chasing Shadows

Description:

Functional Integrals, Markov Chains, and HMC. Symplectic Integrators and Shadow ... step sizes for different contributions to the action (Sexton Weingarten) ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:87
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 45
Provided by: ADK3
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Chasing Shadows


1
Chasing Shadows
  • A D Kennedy
  • University of Edinburgh

2
Outline
  • Functional Integrals, Markov Chains, and HMC
  • Symplectic Integrators and Shadow Hamiltonians
  • Symplectic 2-form and Hamiltonian vector fields
  • Poisson brackets
  • BCH formula
  • Shadow Hamiltonians
  • Shadows for gauge theories
  • Improved integrators
  • Hessian (force-gradient) integrators
  • Instabilities
  • Free field theory
  • Pseudofermions
  • Multiple pseudofermions
  • Hasenbusch, RHMC, DD-HMC
  • Multiple shifts and multiple sources

3
Functional Integrals
  • Integral is over all field configurations
  • (At least) one integral for each lattice site
  • This become an infinite dimensional integral in
    the continuum limit

4
Fermions
  • Fermion fields are Grassmann-valued
  • Grassmann integration of quadratic form gives a
    determinant
  • We replace these by bosonic integrals over
    pseudofermion fields with inverse kernel

5
Fermionic Operators
  • Operators involving Fermion fields can be
    expressed as non-local bosonic operators

Add Fermion sources
Complete the square
Shift Fermion fields
Evaluate Grassmann integral
  • Evaluating the inverses of the Fermion kernel is
    usually the expensive part of measuring operators
    on dynamical gauge configurations

6
Markov Chains
  • Evaluate functional integrals by Monte Carlo
  • Generate configurations from Markov chain
  • Iterating ergodic Markov step(s) converges to
    fixed point distribution
  • Detailed balance ? fixed point
  • Metropolis accept/reject ? detailed balance

7
Hybrid Monte Carlo (HMC)
  • Solution of Hamiltons equations would then
    generate a new phase space configuration which
    satisfies detailed balance
  • Reversible (after a momentum flip)
  • Measure preserving (Liouvilles theorem)
  • Equiprobable (energy conservation)
  • Momentum pseudofermion heatbath ? ergodicity?

8
HMC and Symplectic Integrators
  • Symmetric symplectic integrators provide discrete
    approximations to the solution of Hamiltons
    equations
  • Symmetric ? reversible
  • Symplectic ? area preserving

9
Hamiltonian Dynamics
10
Hamiltonian Dynamics
11
Hamiltonian Dynamics
12
Proofs I
13
Proofs II
14
Proofs III
  • This means that 0-forms on a symplectic manifold
    form a Lie algebra with a Lie bracket that is not
    a commutator

15
Symplectic Integrators
  • The basic idea of a symplectic integrator is to
    write the time evolution operator as

16
PQP Integrator
17
Baker-Campbell-Hausdorff formula
  • Such commutators are in the Free Lie algebra
  • The Bn are Bernoulli numbers

18
BCH formula
  • We only include commutators that are not related
    by antisymmetry or the Jacobi relation
  • These are chosen from a Hall basis

19
Symmetric Symplectic Integrators
  • In order to construct reversible integrators we
    use symmetric symplectic integrators

20
Shadow Hamiltonian I
21
Shadow Hamiltonian II
22
Scalar Theory
  • Note that HPQP cannot be written as the sum of a
    p-dependent kinetic term and a q-dependent
    potential term
  • So, sadly, it is not possible to construct an
    integrator that conserves the Hamiltonian we
    started with

23
How to Tune Integrators
24
Classical Mechanicson Group Manifolds
  • We first formulate classical mechanics on a Lie
    group manifold, and then rewrite it in terms of
    the usual constrained variables (U and P
    matrices)

25
Fundamental 2-form
26
Hamiltonian Vector Field
  • We may now follow the usual procedure to find the
    equations of motion
  • Introduce a Hamiltonian function (0-form) H on
    the cotangent bundle (phase space) over the group
    manifold

27
Poisson Brackets
28
More Poisson Brackets
29
Even More Poisson Brackets
30
Integrators
31
Hessian Integrators
  • The force for this integrator involves second
    derivatives of the action
  • Using this type of step we can construct
    efficient Hessian (Force-Gradient) integrators

32
Higher-Order Integrators
  • We can eliminate all the leading order Poisson
    brackets in the shadow Hamiltonian leaving errors
    of
  • The coefficients of the higher-order Poisson
    brackets are much smaller than those from the
    Campostrini integrator

33
Campostrini Integrator
34
Hessian Integrators
35
Multiple Timescale Integrators
  • Use different integration step sizes for
    different contributions to the action
    (SextonWeingarten)
  • Evaluate cheap forces that give a large
    contribution to the shadow Hamiltonian more
    frequently
  • Original application failed because largest
    contribution to shadow Hamiltonian was also the
    most expensive

36
Instabilities in Free Field Theory
37
Integrator Instabilities
  • When the step size exceeds some critical value
    the BCH expansion for the shadow Hamiltonian
    diverges
  • No real conserved shadow Hamiltonian
  • Symplectic integrators become exponentially
    unstable in trajectory length

38
Symptoms
39
Higher Order Integrator Instabilities
  • The values of at which instabilities
    occur depends on the choice of integrator
  • Mike Clark
  • Omelyan, Mryglod, Folk Computer Physics
    Communcations 151 (2003) 272-314
  • Joo et al Phys Rev D62 (2000) 114501
    (hep-lat/0005023)

40
Pseudofermions
  • The pseudofermion contribution to the shadow
    Hamiltonian has one more power of the inverse
    fermion kernel than the intrinsic fermion
    contribution
  • The pseudofermions are fixed during a trajectory,
    so probably do not suppress this extra inverse
    power

41
Multiple Pseudofermions
42
Multiple Pseudofermion Techniques
43
Multi-Everything Solvers
  • For RHMC we evaluate fractional powers of the
    fermion kernel using optimal (Chebyshev) partial
    fraction rational approximations
  • We thus need to find solutions for this kernel
    (the Dirac operator or its square) for
  • Multiple shifts shifts are poles of rational
    approximation
  • Multiple right hand sides for multiple
    pseudofermions
  • We already use a multishift solver, but
  • How to do so for multiple right hand sides?
  • Can we use an initial guess extrapolated from the
    past?
  • Can we restart the solver to avoid stagnation?

44
RHMC with Multiple Timescales
  • Semiempirical observation The largest force from
    a single pseudofermion does not come from the
    smallest shift
  • Use a coarser timescale for expensive smaller
    shifts
  • Invert small shifts less accurately
  • Cannot use chronological inverter with multishift
    solver anyhow

45
Outlook
  • Large-scale computations with light dynamical
    fermions require
  • Avoiding integrator instabilities as far as
    possible
  • Use multiple pseudofermion fields
  • Reducing volume contributions to HShadow
  • Tune integrators by measuring Poisson brackets
  • Use good higher order integrators, such as
    Hessian/Force Gradient
  • Using longer trajectories
  • Reduces autocorrelations as physical correlation
    lengths grow
  • Amortizes cost of pseudofermion heatbath and
    Metropolis energy calculation
  • Improving solver technology
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com