Universal Design of Assessments - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Universal Design of Assessments

Description:

Define 'universally designed' assessments within the current context of large ... 'Simplex Sigillum Veri' 'The simple is the seal of the true' ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:56
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 21
Provided by: sandyth
Learn more at: https://nceo.umn.edu
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Universal Design of Assessments


1
Universal Design of Assessments
Christopher Johnstone, National Center on
Educational Outcomes
2
Goals
  • Define universally designed assessments within
    the current context of large-scale assessments
    and accountability
  • Identify elements of universally designed
    assessments
  • Identify relevant research

3
Universal Design Research?
  • Pieced together from
  • Specific accommodations research
  • Policy statements
  • Other fields (vision, ergonomics, graphic design,
    Universal Design of architecture research)

4
Universally designed assessments
  • are designed from the beginning to be accessible
    and valid for the widest range of students
  • provide optimal standard assessment conditions

5
Who Benefits?
  • Universal design does not apply exclusively to
    people with disabilities or limited English
    proficiency
  • It applies to all individuals, with wide ranging
    characteristics

6
Think about universal design in architecture and
tool design
  • Curb cuts and ramps
  • Elevators that talk to you
  • Door handles rather than knobs
  • Special pen shapes that are easier to hold

7

Remember this? OFFICIAL BALLOT, PALM BEACH
COUNTY, FLORIDA
8
Elements of UD Assessments
  • Inclusive assessment population
  • Precisely defined constructs
  • Accessible, non-biased items
  • Amenable to accommodations

9
Elements of UD Assessments (continued)
  • Simple, clear, and intuitive instructions and
    procedures
  • Maximum readability and comprehensibility
  • Maximum legibility

10
Preliminary Research in Universal Design
  • Sample of 230 students taken from four schools in
    US Southwest.
  • Two schools were town schools (pop. 20,000) and
    two were rural schools.
  • Students chosen from sixth grade teams that had
    populations of students with disabilities.

11
Research Design
  • Two tests were created, one from sample statewide
    test items, the other re-designed using UD
    principles.
  • Each student took both tests.
  • Students randomly assigned to take a particular
    test first to prevent practice effect.
  • Constructs held constant for each item.

12
Community Involvement
  • Advisory Board trained in principles of Universal
    Design and asked to comment / suggest
    improvements based on their perspectives.
  • Team consisted of three parents of children in
    special education program (one Navajo, one
    Latina, one Anglo) and one community member with
    dyslexia.

13
Sample Item
  • Ramón is building a doghouse. He wants the roof
    of the doghouse to be at an angle that is more
    than 90 but less than 110. Which angle below
    could he use for the roof?
  • A. B.
  • C. D.

14
Revised Item
  • Which angle is more than 90 and less than 110?
  • A. B.
  • C. D.

15
What changed??
  • Design element 2 construct more precisely
    defined.
  • Design element 3 bias eliminated (dog house,
    Ramón)
  • Design element 4 built in accommodations
    un-timed, students circled answer on paper, did
    not bubble
  • Design element 5 simple instructions and
    procedures
  • Design element 6 more comprehensible language,
    underlined key words
  • Design element 7 larger font

16
Results
  • Means of two tests were compared and t-tests
    performed.
  • A difference of 8.16 (1.67 sig.) was found
    between means, a statistically significant
    finding.
  • Effect size calculated using Cohens d. Effect
    of design .61 (or 6/10 Standard Deviation
    difference) a moderate effect

17
Why??
  • Students with largest difference between two
    tests were interviewed to determine difference
    for them.
  • Students noted that more direct language made it
    easier for them to understand items and
    unlimited time helped them to think better
    about items. Students also said they
    remembered content better on UD test.

18
What have we learned?
  • Design matters!! How a test is designed may
    effect how a student scores on that test.
  • Items that are better designed appear to aid
    students that are English Language Learners and
    with disabilities show what they know better.
  • This leads to more valid assessment of
    traditionally under-performing students.

19
Simplex Sigillum VeriThe simple is the seal
of the true
  • Tests that remain true to constructs, are easy to
    understand, and contain language that is
    accessible to all will give the truest readings
    of what students do and do not know. Universal
    Design does not mean dumbing down a test.

20
More information?
NCEO Resources
  • Visit http//education.umn.edu/nceo or Search
    for NCEO
  • Web site includes
  • Topic introduction
  • Frequently Asked Questions
  • Online and Other Resources including synthesis
    report and policy directions for Universally
    Designed assessments.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com