Title: Towards a Sustainable FTAA: Does Latin America Meet the Necessary Financial Preconditions
1Towards a Sustainable FTAA Does Latin America
Meet the Necessary Financial Preconditions?
- Liliana Rojas-Suarez
- November, 2002
2Recent Developments Are Providing Renewed
Interest in LAC towards a Trade Agreements Model
- NAFTA has proved successful and has produced
significant benefits to Mexico - Forecasts for capital flows to the region are
discouraging. The model of growth financed solely
by private inflows no longer seems viable for LAC - The approval of TPA was seen as a signal of US
commitment towards free trade. However, recent
protectionist measures have clouded this
achievement and these concerns were reflected in
the Quito meetings. - The agreement in Doha is supportive of new trade
arrangements
3What Does Current Research Conclude about the
Preparedness of LAC Countries to Join a Free
Trade Area?
4What Does Current Research Conclude about the
Preparedness of LAC Countries to Join a Free
Trade Area?
- There is a coincidence in the Schott and WEF
studies regarding the best performers in terms
of readiness to compete internationally Chile,
Costa Rica, Mexico, TT and Uruguay - There is also agreement that Nicaragua and
Ecuador are the worst performers i.e., the least
ready to join FTAA - However, there are significant discrepancies in
the ranking of some major countries in the
region, such as Brazil and Venezuela, as well as
several of the smaller countries - As of 2001, none of these studies classified
Argentina as a bad performer
5Further Financial Conditions Necessary to Ensure
the Sustainability of a Free Trade Area
- While the macro, micro, and political variables
identified by recent research are necessary to
assess a countrys capacity to join a free trade
area, I argue that those variables are not
sufficient to ensure the sustainability of the
integration effort. - Two additional financial policy requirements are
needed - Sustainable public debts as determined by the
achievement of sustainable structural fiscal
balances - Compatible exchange rate systems across trading
partners - Both requirements aim at containing incentives to
break the rules of a free trade area in the
presence of an adverse shock.
6Sustainable Public Debts Ensure Sustainable Free
Trade Agreements
- If a country faces severe difficulties in
servicing its debt, pressures for obtaining
additional resources through tariff increases and
relaxation of trade agreements will develop. The
impasse in MERCOSUR during 2000-2001 exemplifies
this point - Ratios such as Debt to Exports or Debt to GDP do
not appropriately indicate whether a country is
on a sustainable debt path - Public Debt sustainability has two components
- Capacity to pay A country has a sustainable
public debt if it is able to generate permanent
primary fiscal balances that stabilizes the ratio
of debt to GDP - Willingness to pay This relates to market
perceptions about a governments commitment to
service external debt
7Compatible Exchange Rate Regimes Across Trading
Partners Are Essential for a Sustainable Free
Trade Area
- Compatible exchange rate systems between trading
partners do not necessarily mean equal regimes or
a common currency - Exchange rate systems between trading partners
are not compatible if an adverse shock in one
partner severely affects the other because of the
exchange rate arrangement - Incompatible exchange rate regimes create
incentives to abandon a free trade agreement
between the member states
8Are Public Debts Sustainable in Latin America?
What About Capacity to Pay?
- Based on assumptions about long term rates of
growth and interest rates, at the end of 2001,
Brazil, Mexico, and Peru were on sustainable
paths. - While the Colombian and the Peruvian cases were
unclear, the cases of Ecuador and Venezuela were
worrisome. - For Brazil, the projected primary surpluses of
3.5 of GDP from 2001 onwards appeared to be
sufficient to maintain the fiscal stand in order.
9Are Public Debts Sustainable in Latin America?
- Based on markets expectations about fiscal
surpluses during 2002, the sharp increase in
spreads cannot be blamed on the fiscal stance.
Indeed, the changes in the forecast signaled an
improvement of the fiscal stance during the
Cardoso government - Instead, the high spreads for Brazil since
mid-2002 were driven by fears about a change of
course by the potential (and now confirmed)
government of Mr. da Silva. With sources of
finance curtailed, the necessary fiscal
adjustment was increased. - Thus, analyses of debt sustainability cannot be
based solely on a countrys capacity to pay.
Perceptions about a countrys willingness to pay
might determine whether a country has a debt
problem.
10Are Exchange Rate Arrangements in LAC Compatible
with Free Trade Areas?
- Given the importance of trade between Brazil and
Argentina, the convertibility law in Argentina
and the flexible exchange rate system in Brazil
were not compatible. The recent change in regime
in Argentina is a step in the right direction for
a sustainable Mercosur
11Are Exchange Rate Arrangements in LAC Compatible
with Free Trade Areas?
- In the Andean Community (AC), dollarization in
Ecuador does not create problems for the
sustainability of the AC because - Share of commodities in exports is extremely high
(90 in Ecuador). Thus, a depreciated currency of
a partner country within the AC will not have a
significant effect on Ecuadors revenues from
exports. - Trade between partners in AC is very small. Small
trade links reduce the contagion effect from
one country to another
12Are Exchange Rate Arrangements in LAC Compatible
with Free Trade Areas?
- In CACM and Caricom, very diversified exchange
rate arrangements (including dollarization) can
be compatible with a stable trade area. This is
due to the small size of these economies and the
small intra-regional trade in both trade areas.
None of the countries in those groups can gain
much by raising tariffs on imports from trade
area partners. - NAFTA teaches an important lesson As the share
of Mexicos trade with the US is very large, the
flexibility of the Mexican exchange rate system
allows Mexico to deal with an adverse shock
arising from the US. Allowing the exchange rate
to adjust is a more efficient and more effective
tool to improve Mexicos trade balance with the
US than increasing tariffs since Mexicos motor
of growth trade integration does not need to
be disturbed by temporary fluctuations in the US
business cycle.