Title: PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE
1PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE
- Dr Arthur McInnis
- Handout F
2Professional Practice
- Competence and Quality of Care
- real context
- part of control process that begins with
admission - control is reactive not proactive
- minimal monitoring overall
- standards vary widely across firms
- strongest case today in favour of it is the
business case
3Competence and Quality of Care
- Standards or sources of obligations imposed by
- the law generally - common law and legal
regulation - the Guide and Code - professional discipline
- standards differ - express reference to this in
6.01(3).
4Competence and Quality of Care
- Competence to act
- 5.03 - A solicitor must not act or continue to
act in circumstances where he cannot represent
the client with competence or diligence. - part of the retainer (Ch 5)
- does this alone mean a solicitor must be
competent? - no - the explanation
5Competence and Quality of Care
- Can a solicitor overcome incompetence? Yes.
- 1. by instructing counsel
- 2. in any other way imaginable.
- Are there limitations? Yes. For 1.
- must be able to exercise sufficient care and
control Sorry it is 5.03(3) - other responsibilities remain
6Competence and Quality of Care
- Are there limitations for 2? Yes.
- cannot involve undue delay, (undue) risk or
(undue) expense for client 6.01(3)
7Competence and Quality of Care
- Diligence, care and skill
- 5.12
- duties owed during the retainer
- bound to carry out instructions (and)(must be
carried out) with diligence - Ask - does this impose an obligation or is it a
statement of intent? - must exercise reasonable care and skill
8Competence and Quality of Care
- Other duties
- efficiency - 5.12(1)
9Competence and Quality of Care
- Other limitations
- the jurisdiction box - 5.12(2), and (6)
- cannot exclude or limit liability in negligence -
6.01(8) and s 59(2) LPO - cannot exclude his liability for professional
misconduct 6.01(10) - cannot seek clients agreement to refrain from
making professional misconduct complaint
6.01(10)
10Competence and Quality of Care
- It could be asked - for fun
- just how far a solicitor could go under 6.01(9)?
- whether 6.01(10) is meaningful given different
standards which apply?
11Competence and Quality of Care
- Care
- tell client timeously in simple language
- the issues raised
- how to be dealt with 5.12(3)
- the steps to be taken
- costs
- explain to client
- the effect of any important and relevant document
12Competence and Quality of Care
- Care
- inform client
- of progress
- significant developments
- reason for any serious delay
13Competence and Quality of Care
- Is there an imperative or mandatory writing
requirement with respect to this? - Not under 5.12
- See 5.12(3), and (7)
14Competence and Quality of Care
- Can competence be given any substance?
- knowledge
- skill 6.01(1)
- ability
- understanding of legal principles
- (knowledge) of practice and procedure 6.01(4)
- seeking 3rd party advice - 6.01(5)
15Competence and Quality of Care
- What is the standard?
- adequacy - 6.01(2), and (4), 12.01
- any 3rd parties chosen should themselves be
competent
16Competence and Quality of Care
- And in the case of barristers alone
- competence is
- relative
- extends to and includes experience
17Competence and Quality of Care
- Is a solicitor responsible for errors in the
barristers advice? - not per se but only obvious errors - 12.03(1)
18Competence and Quality of Care
- And what of solicitors responsibilities
generally when barrister instructed? - cannot amount to their abrogation
19Competence and Quality of Care
- Other responsibilities for the solicitor?
- Use of best endeavours to ensure
- instructions carried out within a reasonable time
- that claim does not become statute barred
- that claim not liable to be struck out for want
of prosecution - 12.03(2)
20Competence and Quality of Care
- Action solicitor must then take
- ask for return or papers to instruct another
barrister - 12.03(2) - correlative obligation upon barrister under para
63(b) Code - 12.03(3)
21Competence and Quality of Care
- Additional risks for the solicitor
- costs penalties
- in (causing or contributing) to avoidable delays
in litigation or - when an action struck for want of prosecution
- and in which case actions for damages may follow
- 6.01(7)
22Competence and Quality of Care
- Dealing with claims - 6.02 and 6,03
- gives rise to a duty to inform client to seek
independent advice - when?
- client makes a claim or
- notifies of intention to do so or
- solicitors act or omission reasonably justifying
claim - BUT does not preclude acting - 6.02 Commentary,
6.03(3)
23Competence and Quality of Care
- Informing of the client must be in writing in
cases where the act or omission was discovered by
the solicitor. - No further communications with client or former
client without approval of manager or Fund.
24Competence and Quality of Care
- Dealing with claims
- must notify insurers as soon as practicable
- through manager
- and co-operate subsequently
- covers client, former client and 3rd party claims
- assumes claim falls within those for which
indemnity provided under Solicitors (Professional
Indemnity) Rules
25Competence and Quality of Care
- Dealing with claims
- no admissions of liability
- no settlement
- nor incurring of costs
- without prior consent of manager or Fund
- a breach of 6.03 or SPIRs and prejudice may give
rise to reimbursal obligation
26Competence and Quality of Care
- 6.04 - prompt response to inquiries
- covers only correspondence
- limited to that from clients and former clients
- extends to 3rd parties on their behalves
- may be broader when from Law Society
- failure potentially disciplinable
27Competence and Quality of Care
- Look out for 6.04(2) as makes failure
- to answer a letter
- to explain conduct when required to do so
- by or from Law Society or Solicitors Disciplinary
Tribunal simpliciter - professional misconduct
28Competence and Quality of Care
- Bar Code 6(d)
- practising and employed covered
- must be competent
- in all professional activities
29Competence and Quality of Care
- Standards for discipline for barristers
- read with Handout H
- professional misconduct - for serious failures to
comply with para 6, or - breach of proper professional standards - for
just failures to comply - therefore to distinguish look at the failure -
ask whether serious or not. - problem as meaning of serious is ambiguous
30Competence and Quality of Care
- Of note - Arthur JS Hall v Simons 2000 3 ALL ER
(HL) 2000 overruled advocates immunity.
31Competence and Quality of Care
- Nowadays by reason of the sophisticated level of
professional education of solicitors which
includes instruction in ethics, advocacy and
court procedure footnote PCLL together with the
clear guidelines in the Solicitors Guide, it is
reasonable to expect a higher standard of
responsibility of instructing solicitors with
regard to the plea than Somasundaram apparently
demands. - S W, 340
32Competence and Quality of Care
- Will you practise law on the edge?