Electron EDM Measurement using a Paramagnetic Crystal - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Electron EDM Measurement using a Paramagnetic Crystal

Description:

High Z material high high net eEDM. E field aligns eEDM. eEDM // eSpin. Induces bulk ... Cold press the powder into pellets, and sinter at 1650 C for 10 h. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:66
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 23
Provided by: cheny3
Learn more at: https://p25ext.lanl.gov
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Electron EDM Measurement using a Paramagnetic Crystal


1
Electron EDM Measurement using a Paramagnetic
Crystal
6/2/03
  • Chen-Yu Liu and S. Lamoreaux (P-23)
  • M. Espy and A. Matlachov (P-21)

2
Shapiros proposal
Usp. Fiz. Nauk., 95 145(1968)
  • High Z material high? high net eEDM.
  • E field aligns eEDM
  • eEDM // eSpin.
  • Induces bulk magnetization, which produces B
    flux.
  • Reverse the E field, and the magnetization signal
    is modulated.

3
Figure of Merit
  • Induced flux
  • Paramagnetic susceptibility
  • Large density of paramagnetic sites.
  • Low temperature.
  • Large unit magnetic moment
  • Enhancement factor
  • Large A (for ?AB).
  • Effective field
  • Large K.
  • EEext/3

4
Whats required?
  • High E field
  • Sample with
  • A small conductivity.
  • A high dielectric strength.
  • A large dielectric constant to reduce D
    cancellation.
  • Large magnetic response.
  • ? An insulating paramagnet.
  • Sensitive magnetometer
  • SQUID.
  • Optical method?
  • Non-linear Faraday effect in atomic vapors.

5
Current Status of eEDM
6
Features of solid state eEDM exp.
  • No effect.
  • High number density of bare electrons.
  • Solid state
  • High dielectric strength.
  • Large magnetic response.
  • Concerns
  • Parasitic, hysteresis effects.

7
First solid state eEDM exp.
  • B.V. Vasilev and E.V. Kolycheva, Sov. Phys.
    JETP, 47 2 243 (1978)
  • Sample Nickel Zinc ferrite
  • dielectric strength 2kV/cm.
  • Fe3 ?b 4 ?B . (uncompensated moment)
  • Atomic enhancement factor 0.52.
  • Magnetic permeability 11 (at 4.2K). (??m0.8)
  • Electric permittivity ?2.2?0.2. (??0K)
  • Cubic lattice.
  • No magnetoelectric effect.
  • Sample size 1cm in dia., 1mm in height. (0.08
    c.c.)
  • E Field 1Kv/cm, 30Hz reversal rate
  • Temperature 4.2K
  • rfSQUID with a field sensitivity of 10-16 T.
  • dFe3 (4.2?6.0) ?10-23 e-cm ? de(8.1
    ?11.6)?10-23 e-cm

8
New Version
  • Gd3 in GGG
  • 4f75d06s0 ( 7 unpaired electrons).
  • Atomic enhancement factor -2.2?0.5.
  • Langevin paramagnet.
  • Dielectric constant 12.
  • Low electrical conductivity and high dielectric
    strength
  • Volume resistivity 1016?-cm.
  • Dielectric strength 10 MV/cm for amorphous
    sample. (Crystalline sample tend to have lower K)
  • Cubic lattice.
  • Larger sample 100 c.c. (4cm in dia. 2 cm in
    height ?2 pieces)
  • Higher E field 5-10kV/cm.
  • Lower temperature 50mK (with a DR).
  • Better SQUID design.

V.A. Dzuba et al., xxx.lanl.govphysics/020647
(June 2002)
9
Solid State Properties of GGG
  • Gadolinium Gallium Garnet
  • Gd3Ga5O12
  • Garnet Structure A3B2(C3)O12
  • A dodecahedron M3?
  • Ca, Mn, Fe, R (La,..Gd,..Lu)
  • B octahedron,C (tetrahedron)
  • Fe, Ga,
  • Ceramic of good electrical properties.

10
Bake GGG Polycrystal
K. McClellan in MST-8
  • Solid State Reaction of the Oxides
  • E.E. Hellstrom et al., J. Am. Ceram. Soc., 72
    1376 (1989)
  • Weigh powders of 3 (Gd2O3)5 (Ga2O3) mole ratio,
    dried at 1000?C for 9 h in air.
  • Mixed and ball-milled with Zirconia balls and
    acetone in polyethylene jars for 6 h.
  • Dry in air to remove acetone.
  • Isostatically pressed into a pellet, then
    prereact at 1350?C for 6 h in air in high-purity
    alumina crucibles.
  • Crush the prereacted pellet using agate mortar
    and pestle and ball-milled (as before) for 24 h.
  • Cold press the powder into pellets, and sinter at
    1650?C for 10 h.
  • Heating and cooling rates 200?C/h below 1000?C

  • 100?C/h above 1000?C

11
Alumina Crucible
Parallel plate capacitor
Single crystal GGG
Polycrystal GGG
12
X-ray diffraction of GGG
J. Valdez and K. Sickafus in MST-8
5/30/03
Polycrystal crushed powder
Polycrystal bulk surface
Single crystal crushed powder
2?
13
Magnetic Properties of GGG
  • Gd3 half filled 4f orbital
  • 7 e- (spin aligned)
  • L0, S7/2
  • A3B2(C3)O12
  • Spin ? ? (?)
  • JABlt0, JACgt0, JBClt0
  • JAA, JAB ltlt JAC
  • In A sublattice
  • JAAlt0 (AF coupling)
  • JNN S(S1) 1.5K
  • Geometrically frustrated AF magnet
  • ? Spin glass transition at 0.4K. (Limit of
    temperature)

14
Susceptibility ?m Measurement I
Sample magnetization M?mH ?m(HextHm)
?m(B0/?0-fM)
?
15
Susceptibility ?m Measurement II
  • Sample disk ?toroid, inductance
  • Resonant frequency
  • Width of the resonant peak

B(1C/T)
1.31K
4K
70K
4 change
16
Electrical Properties of Poly-GGG
V0
  • Dielectric constant
  • K 10-20
  • Leakage current

Vm
17
Instrumentation
  • Macor/graphite coated
  • electrodes. (reduce Johnson noise)
  • Sample/electrode plates sandwiched by G10 clamps.
  • G10 can wrapped by superconducting Pb foils (two
    layers).
  • Rectangular magnetic field formed by high ?
    Metglas alloy ribbons.
  • Additional layers of cryoperm 10 sheets.
  • A magnetic shielding factor gt 109.
  • The whole assembly is immersed in L-He bath,
    cooled by a high cooling power dilution
    refrigerator. (10?W at 10mK, 100?W at 100mK)

?
18
Magnetic flux pick-up coil (planar gradiometer)
  • Common rejection of residual external
  • uniform B field and fluctuations.
  • Enhancement of sample flux pick-up.


R12cm R22.2cm R3?(R12R22)3.42cm LG700nH for
10?m dia. wire 500nH for 100?m dia.
Wire (Nb superconducting wire)
0
_
2.5
5
19
SQUID
M. Espy and A. Matlachov
  • DC SQUID two Josephson junctions on a
    superconducting ring.
  • Flux to voltage transformer.
  • Energy sensitivity 5 at 50 mK.
  • Flux noise 0.2 ??0/vHz.
  • Field sensitivity in principle can be infinite
    by using large pick-up coil with thin wire,
    typically fT/vHz.
  • Pick-up coil connects to a spiral SQUID input
    coil, which is inductively coupled to SQUID.
  • Coupling constant (geometrical factor)?

20
How well can we do?
  • Lsq 0.2 nH (intrinsic)
  • Lp0.7 ?H (gradiometer)
  • Li0.5 ?H
  • Coupling eff. ?sq/?p v(LsqLi)/(LpLi)
    8?10-3.
  • de ??sq/?sq(0.2??0/vt)/(8?10-3 ? ?p)
  • with 10kV/cm, T10mK, A100 cm2 around GGG
  • ?p 17??0 per 10-27e-cm
  • de 1.47?10-27 /vt e-cm
  • In 10 days of averaging, de 10-30 e-cm.

21
Expected systematic effects
  • Random noise
  • High voltage fluctuation.
  • SQUID 1/f noise.
  • Sample 1/f noise, due to paramagnetic
    dissipation. ???
  • External B field fluctuation. (gradiometer)
  • Displacement current at field reversal.
  • Generate large field. (position of the pick-up
    coil)
  • Too big a field change for SQUID to follow. ???
  • Leakage current. (lt10-14A, should be feasible at
    low temp.)
  • Linear magneto-electric effect.
  • Deviation from cubic symmetry. ???
  • Vibrations relative to the superconducting Pb can
    (trapped flux ? field fluctuations). ???
  • Magnetic impurities. (no problem, as long as they
    dont move.)
  • Spin-lattice relaxation ???
  • Energy dissipation lt 10?W at 10mK.

22
Tentative Schedule
  • (v ) Sample preparation and characterization.
    (fall 2002)
  • (v ) Design and build experiment. (spring 2003)
  • ( _ ) Couple to dilution refrigerator. (fall
    2003)
  • ( _ ) First measurement using SQUID. (winter
    2003)
  • ( _ ) Preliminary results. (spring 2004)
  • ( _ ) Improved version using optical method.
    (summer 2004)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com