Quantifying Oral Health Related Quality of Life Hans Gjrup Aarhus University Hospital - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 42
About This Presentation
Title:

Quantifying Oral Health Related Quality of Life Hans Gjrup Aarhus University Hospital

Description:

OHIP, Oral Health Impact Profile, Slade and Spencer 1994 ... Jokovic, Slade et al 2002. Child Health Questionnaire. Landgraf et al 1996 ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:870
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 43
Provided by: hansg9
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Quantifying Oral Health Related Quality of Life Hans Gjrup Aarhus University Hospital


1
Quantifying Oral Health Related Quality of
LifeHans GjørupAarhus University Hospital
The 4th Nordic Conference on Orofacial Therapy
2
Aarhus University HospitalÅrhus Sygehus
3
Oral health and quality of life- any relation?
4
Quality of life (QoL)
  • QoL is related to health
  • Health and ability to function
  • Vital functions in the orofacial area
  • Oral Health Related Quality of life

5
WHO definition of health
  • WHO Constitution 1946
  • Health is a state of complete physical, mental
    and social wellbeing and not merely the absence
    of disease or infirmity

6
WHO definition of health
  • WHO 1998
  • Health is a ressource for everyday life, not the
    object of living. It is a positive concept
    emphasizing social and personal ressources as
    well as physical capabilities.

7
Theoretical referenceHolistic theories
  • Disease or sickness
  • Physical changes of organs in the body
  • Lack of an organ or part of the body
  • Malfunction of organs
  • Lack of function

8
Theoretical referenceHolistic theories
  • Health is the ability of the individual to
    achieve vital aims in daily life
  • Acceptabel health
  • An individual definition

9
Disease versus illness
  • Diseased or sound
  • Objective
  • Biomedical items
  • Functional limitations
  • Impairment
  • Disease
  • Death
  • Illness or wellbeing
  • Subjective
  • Sociomedical items
  • Discomfort
  • Incompetence
  • Handicap

10
Lockers model for Oral HealthREFLocker D.
Measuring oral health a conceptual framework.
Community Dent Health 1988 53-18
Functional limitation
  • Disability
  • Physical
  • Psychological
  • Social

Disease
Impairment
Handicap
Discomfort pain
11
Quantifying oral health
  • Biomedical items
  • DMFS/T
  • Gingival index, Löe and Silness 1963
  • PAR index, Richmond 1992
  • Research diagnostic criteria, Dvorkin and LeReche
    1992

12
Quantifying oral health
  • Sociomedical items
  • Research diagnostic criteria, Dvorkin and LeReche
    1992
  • OHQoL indices
  • Oral Health related Quality of Life

13
www.qolid.org/proqolid
14
OHQoL for adults
  • GOHAI. General Oral Health Assessment Index,
    Atchinson and Dolan, 1990
  • Dental Impact Profile, Strauss and Hunt 1993
  • OHIP, Oral Health Impact Profile, Slade and
    Spencer 1994
  • DIDL Dental Impact on Daily Living, Leao and
    Sheiham 1996
  • OIDP, Oral Impacts on Daily Performances,
    Adulyanon and Sheiham 1997

15
OHQoL for children
  • Child Health Questionnaire
  • Landgraf et al 1996
  • Childhood Asthma Questionnaires
  • French and Christies 1996
  • Child-OIDP, Child Oral Impact on Daily
    Performances
  • Gherunpong, Tsakos, Sheiham 2004
  • COHQoL, Child Oral Health related Quality of Life
  • Jokovic, Slade et al 2002

16
Pub MED searchAdults/adolescents Quality of
Life - and
  • DIDL 3 hits
  • GOHAI 19 hits
  • OIDP 23 hits
  • OHIP 101 hits

17
OHIP translated into
  • English / American
  • Hungarian
  • Brazil
  • German
  • Portugese
  • Swedish
  • Hebrew
  • Spanish
  • Malaysian
  • Sri Lanka
  • Chinese
  • Japanese
  • Danish

18
Translation procedures
Translation english to danish
Backtranslation danish to english
Comparing the 2 english versions
Adjustment of the danish version
19
Pub MED searchChildren Quality of Life and
  • Child - OIDP 8 hits (2004-2007)
  • CPQ 12 hits (2002-2007)

20
Quantifying the impact of oral health on quality
of life
  • OHIP (Slade 1994)
  • Oral Health Impact Profile
  • COHQoL (Jokovic 2002)
  • Child Oral Health Quality of Life
  • Standardized questionnaires
  • Frequency of symptoms or experiences
  • Score 0 4
  • 0 never
  • 4 daily / always
  • Validation studies performed

21
OHIP(Slade Spencer 1994)
  • 49 questions
  • 7 domaines
  • Functional limitations
  • Physical pain
  • Psychological discomfort
  • Physical disability
  • Psychological disability
  • Social disability
  • Handicap

22
Questions
  • Functional limitations
  • Have you felt that your sense of taste was
    worsened because of problems with your teeth,
    mouth or denture?
  • Physical pain
  • Have you had toothache?
  • Psychological impact
  • Have you felt uncomfortable about the appearance
    of your teeth, mouth or denture?

23
Questions
  • Physical disability
  • Have you been unable to brush your teeth
    properly due to problems with your teeth, mouth
    or denture?
  • Psychological disability
  • Have you felt depressed because of problems with
    your teeth, mouth or dentures?
  • Social disability
  • Have you had difficulty doing your usual jobs
    because of problems with your teeth, mouth or
    dentures?.

24
Reliability and validity of a Sweedish version of
Oral Health Impact Profile Larson P, List T, et
al 2004Acta Odontol Scand 62 148-152
  • OHIP-S
  • 5 groups
  • TMD (n30)
  • Sjøgren Syndrom (n30)
  • Oral mucosal pain (n28)
  • Skeletal malocclusion (n27)
  • Healthy controls (n30)
  • Mean OHIP total-score
  • 61,0
  • 42,4
  • 45,6
  • 41,3
  • 9,3

25
Larson P 2004Acta Odontol Scand 62 148-152
  • Conclusions
  • The reliability of the OHIP-S appears to be good
  • The validity of the OHIP-S is acceptable
  • OHIP-S can differentiate between groups of
    patients with different kinds of functional
    limitations and healthy individuals
  • The use of OHIP-S in future studies is recommended

26
COHQoL(Jokovic Locker 2002)
  • 4 types
  • CPQ 6 7 (child perception questionnarie)
  • CPQ 8 10 (child perception questionnarie)
  • CPQ 11 14 (child perception questionnarie)
  • PPQ (parental perception
    questionnarie)
  • 29 49 questions
  • 4 domaines
  • Oral symptoms
  • Functional limitations
  • Psychological well-being
  • Social well.being

27
Validity and reliability of a questionnaire for
measuring Child Oral-helath-related Quality of
Life Jokovic A et al. 2002 J Dent Res,
81(7)459-463
  • CPQ 11-14
  • 3 groups
  • Pedodontic (n32)
  • Orthodontic (n52)
  • Orofacial (n39)
  • Mean CPQ total-scores
  • 23,3 (SD 18,4)
  • 24,3 (SD 14,5)
  • 31,4 (SD 17,1)

28
Jokovic A et al. 2002J Dent Res, 81(7)459-463
  • Conclusions
  • CPQ 11-14 is valid
  • CPQ 11-14 has excellent reliability
  • Orofacial conditions have substantial impact on
    functional and psychosocial well-being
  • Psychometrically acceptabel accounts of the
    impact can be achieved
  • CPQ 11-14 performs well as a discriminant measure

29
Boy, 14 year, AIImpact upon QoL ?
30
AI-boy, 14 yearCPQ 11-14
31
CPQ profile, AI-boy
32
CPQ_5 boys with HEDPedo and ortho group_Jokovic
2002
33
Male, 20 year, AMCImpact upon QoL ?
34
OHIP, male, 20 years, AMCSweedish control
groupLarsson P, List T, Lundström I, Marcusson
A, Ohrbach R. Reliability and validity of a
Sweedish version of the Oral Health Impact
Profile (OHIP-S). Acta Odontol Scand 2004
62147-152.
35
OHIP, male, 20 year, AMCSweedish control
groupLarsson P, List T, Lundström I, Marcusson
A, Ohrbach R. Reliability and validity of a
Sweedish version of the Oral Health Impact
Profile (OHIP-S). Acta Odontol Scand 2004
62147-152.
36
Female, 59 years, Ehlers Danloss syndrome
37
Oral Health Impact ProfilesEDS-pt vs TMD group
(30)
38
Impact of oligodontia on OoL?
  • Patients referred to the Centre for Oral Health
    in Rare Diseases
  • Agenesis of 13 teeth or more
  • 9 patients answered the OHIP questionnaire in
    2006-2007
  • 16 37 years of age
  • 3 females
  • 6 males

39
OHIP 9 individuals with agenesis
40
Agenesis group (N9) vs.3 groups in the OHIP-S
study
41
OHQoL indices- conclusions
  • A diagnostic tool in treatment planning
  • Complement to objective needs assessment
  • Evaluate outcome of treatment
  • The ultimate parameter in evaluation of quality
    of treatment
  • Part of population studies
  • An issue in national population surveys and
    public health care planning

42
Thank you for your attention
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com